Skip to main content

tv   The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell  MSNBC  February 15, 2016 7:00pm-8:01pm PST

7:00 pm
senator amy klobuchar of minnesota. centrist democratic senator who does not have an enemy in the world, has a squeaky clean reputation, and is a former prosecutor. that is why you are seeing amy klobuchar's name on the list -- on the short list in terms of a potential successor to justice antonin scalia. and amy klobuchar will be here on this show live tomorrow night. until she cancels at the last minute because she's being vetted for the supreme court. that does it for us tonight. we'll see you again tomorrow. now it's time for "the last word" with lawrence o'donnell. good evening, lawrence. >> rachel, if she cancels, you have breaking news tomorrow. >> it's like do i want to wait by the phone, hoping and also not hoping that she calls? >> that is a perfect setup. >> thank you. >> that's perfect. thank you, rachel. >> appreciate it. >> thank you. well, the united states senate used to confirm supreme court justices within days, or sometimes at most a couple of weeks of the president actually nominating them. and they used to be confirmed
7:01 pm
without being asked a single question by a single senator. what changed all that? what we're doing right now. television. >> i plan to fulfill my constitutional responsibilities to nominate a successor. >> we should not allow a lame duck president to essentially capture the supreme court -- >> do not obstruct. obey the constitution! >> it's called delay, delay, delay. >> barack obama is president of the united states until january 20th, 2017. >> if donald trump is president, he will appoint liberals. >> he's a lying guy. a really lying guy. i think he's a basket case. >> there seems to be a lot of name calling going on. >> the world trade center came down during the, you know, reign of george bush. right? i mean, it came down. >> and he sounds like a liberal democrat to me. >> if the president went to the beach, we would have been better off. >> we did in fact keep the
7:02 pm
nation safe for 7 1/2 years. >> what does that mean he kept the country safe after 9/11? what about during 9/11? >> i'm a half glass full man. 227 years ago president george washington appointed john jay, who by the way did not go to law school, appointed john jay to be the first chief justice of the united states supreme court. the senate confirmed washington's choice for chief justice unanimously without a confirmation hearing, and within a few days of that the senate confirmed four more members of the supreme court without confirmation hearings. that's how easy the founding fathers thought the confirmation process should be for the president's choice for supreme court justices. for the next 127 years, that's generally the way it worked. a few nominees were rejected here and there. but the rest of the time the
7:03 pm
president nominated and the senate routinely confirmed within a matter of days or weeks without ever having a senate confirmation hearing. that process of no background checks and no hearings gave us the likes of chief justice john marshall and oliver wendell holmes. the system worked. the first senate confirmation hearing, public senate confirmation hearing for a supreme court nominee was not coincidentally, it was in fact for the first jewish nominee. and that was no coincidence that the first jewish nominee got the first confirmation hearing. louis brandeis, president wilson's nominee, was as the first jewish nominee, was a bit of a shock to the system, a shock that a senate confirmation hearing confirmed. justice brandeis then went on to become one of the great figures in the history of american jurisprudence. there were only two more confirmation hearings for the
7:04 pm
supreme court justices in 1925 and 1938, and those were to address some rumors of scandal, and each of those nominees was then confirmed. the longest serving justice in the history of the court, william o. douglas, who was also possibly the most controversial justice in the history of the court, was confirmed in 1939 by a vote of 62-4, and he was confirmed without a senate confirmation hearing. senate legend has it that william o. douglas sat outside the judiciary committee's meeting room one day when his nomination was pending and douglas passed a handwritten note to the chairman saying do you have any questions for me? a clerk brought that very same note back to justice douglas with the chairman's handwritten one-word reply on it. that reply was "no." then about 15 years later the
7:05 pm
most destructive force that has ever hit the united states senate arrived in washington. television. the most destructive senator of that time, republican joe mccarthy, discovered television could make him famous when he held witch hunt hearings searching for communists. >> have you no sense of decency, sir? at long last. have you left no sense of decency? >> after the mccarthy hearings confirmation hearings for supreme court justices became routine, and preening by senators on camera during those hearings became routine. and in order to pretend the hearings were actually about something the judiciary committee obtained fbi background checks on the nominees. committee staff then studied the nominees' tax returns, and they studied every word the nominees
7:06 pm
had ever written, studying the stacks of material that the judiciary committee obtained for those confirmation hearings took longer and longer as the stacks of paper got bigger and bigger. and this process has not produced better justices than oliver wendell holmes and john marshall and benjamin cardozo, who got confirmed before the judiciary committee had any staff, who got confirmed before tax returns existed. well, cardozo didn't. they got confirmed before the fbi existed. the modern confirmation process is a completely corrupted process that bears no semblance to what the framers of the constitution had in mind. senate confirmation hearings of supreme court justices have become political tv shows in which senators from each party perform for their section of the audience. they perform for their share of
7:07 pm
the campaign contributors who watch those hearings. on both sides. they vote for and against nominees now based not on the nominees' qualifications but based on the nominees' suspected political inclinations. president obama will soon nominate a supreme court justice to replace antonin scalia. the senate could reasonably and faithfully discharge its duties regarding that nomination in a matter of days, as the senate has done many, many times before. could certainly do it within a week or two. in the election year of 1912 republican president william taft nominated marlon pitney on march 13th. a republican-controlled senate confirmed justice pitney five days later by a vote of 50-26. five days. that's all it took in an
7:08 pm
election year. if the president nominated attorney general loretta lynch or anyone else who the senate knows well and who was recently confirmed by the senate, every senator could easily decide how to vote in five days without a confirmation hearing. but that won't happen. not because of any senate rule. no senate rule prevents it. not because of historical precedent. historical precedent does not lean against this. the only thing preventing the united states senate from taking quick action on the president's next supreme court nomination is america's toxic mix of politics and television. joining us now, david frum, senior editor for "the atlantic" "the atlantic." jonathan allen, head of community and content for sidewire, and a columnist for roll call. and tom goldstein, publisher of scotus blog and a supreme court expert. david frum, the senate majority
7:09 pm
leader in an unprecedented move announced shortly after justice scalia was pronounced dead that he absolutely will not bring any nominee by the president to a vote in the senate. we have turned a corner in the modern contentious history of supreme court nominations. >> well, lawrence, i'm going to speak to your sense of political realism. it's no surprise that leader mcconnell would do that. of course he would do that. of course he would run out a clock on a nominee by the opposing party. what is astonishing is that he said it and that he felt it necessary to say it. and one of the things that is -- i don't know whether it's liberating or horrifying is the disappearance of the hypocrisy with which we used to surround what were political decisions. >> well, jonathan allen, i saw a tweet saturday night that urged from a republican commentator, that urged mcconnell to do this
7:10 pm
immediately, specifically so that the process would not be about who the president nominates, that you then -- voters then would not hold it against them that they were stopping any individual, they were just stopping whoever he nominated. >> yes, surely, this is done on principle. the principle that the president only has three years in his term, lawrence. i say that sarcastically. there's only one qualification to be supreme court justice, and that's that the president appoint you and the senate confirms you. it's the most egalitarian process there is. that said, i agree with david. there's a situation mitch mcconnell's in in which his base would have his head if he didn't come out and try to prevent barack obama from appointing a justice. it's a sad state of affairs our democracy is in. and it's not one party. i can certainly imagine this happening if you had a republican president in the middle of a presidential campaign going on trying to appoint a conservative justice
7:11 pm
to the court to replace a liberal. it says a lot about our dismissal of the civility and of the norms that have long guided our nation and that keep our republic's fabric together. >> tom goldstein, do we have a sense about how justice scalia himself would privately react to this situation? >> well, i have to say that the justice probably really recognized that the whole system was completely broken, that he treasured democracy, he loved the notion of executive power, that the president would have the authority to control nominations not only within the white house and the executive branch but also the judiciary, and i think he would just shake his head at the whole process. he wouldn't say the supreme court's job was to fix it. he'd say that was somebody else's problem. but he would think this was shameful. >> and david frum, david axelrod revealed over the weekend a conversation that he had had with justice scalia when there was a vacancy on the court in the obama administration and
7:12 pm
justice scalia said, you know, send us someone like elena kagan, very specifically send us elena kagan. and so what we cleaned from that certainly if that's the only evidence we have, private evidence of justice scalia's thinking, is he would want the president to act in this situation and choose who the president wanted. >> well, i don't -- no. i think in that situation justice scalia thought, well, there's going to be a liberal, let's get the best possible liberal and let's also get a liberal i find he personally congenial. and they became good friends. it is a club. but notice what mitch mcconnell's blanket statement did. and it was dumb politics. because it changed the incentives for the president. if the republicans had been cageyer. if they had played their cards closer to their vest about what they're going to do, the incentive to president obama would be to try to find someone he liked but that was also acceptable to the republicans. a kind of democratic david souter. to get -- slip somebody by the republicans and hope that maybe it would work.
7:13 pm
the republicans would know it was doomed. they're going to run out the clock. but the president might not know that. now look at the incentives facing the president. knowing that he does not have to worry about what kind of justice this person will be. that he can treat this nomination as a pure gimme, a chance to rally his base. he should from his point of view nominate loretta lynch because what an image of the republicans refusing to have a vote on a black woman with all of her qualifications. that would be very powerful for a democratic party that is worried about voter turnout and voter mobilization. and the result is we're going to have a much more ugly and contentious fight than we would have if the republicans had been a little more discreet about what they were planning to do. >> tom goldstein, any indicators about who the president might choose if the president is really going for confirmation here in i mean, there's two ways to go. one is to just make a point and nominate someone who the president knows probably wouldn't get confirmed under any circumstances. or the other choice, which is much trickier, someone who can actually get confirmed.
7:14 pm
>> well, i think the white house will conclude that nobody can get confirmed, so it's kind of a wild hypothetical. i do think republicans may decide they have to give the person a vote and then they'll all vote against them because it's been suggested the conservative base will never allow any republican senator to vote for the nominee. but in the hypothetical world where they were trying to get somebody through they probably would pick someone like judge sri srinivasan of the d.c. circuit who actually his biggest obstacle to being confirmed previously was from the left, not from the right. and so he's a relatively centrist candidate. but anybody that president obama gets put up, the one thing republicans know is they have to defeat that nominee. >> and tom, just to stay on that, what would the republican speeches in opposition to him be given that he was virtually unanimously confirmed by the senate? >> he was in fact unanimously confirmed. the administration has two recent nominees like that. they would say something along the following lines. first is this is a nomination
7:15 pm
that's going to change the direction of the supreme court. so it requires extraordinary scrutiny. we have to take a lot more time than has been provided to us. we voted for him before but that was a different court, and we find in his records indications he would be ideologically much more liberal and out of touch with the country. you just make things up. as soon as the republicans are willing to just offer a vote, then it becomes kind of too complicated for kind of ordinary americans who are concerned about jobs and terrorism to focus on. it's only if the republicans, as david was saying, refuse to have a vote at all that this really works politically very well for the administration. so in the end i bet they do give the nominee a vote and then just vote the person down. >> squloejt, given what tom just said, which i think makes a lot of sense, doesn't that argue for a more prominent nominee, someone like loretta lynch, who the public already has a certain familiarity with, so they understand who this is, who's being rejected if that's what's going to happen? >> well, i think there are a couple of benefits to loretta
7:16 pm
lynch, one of which and perhaps maybe will be the guiding principle here, is she's the person whose life would be least disrupted by this. if she gets nominated to be a supreme court justice, she doesn't have to leave being attorney general to do that. she's already been through a confirmation process recently. she knows the senators. she's had time to be up close and personal with them. if she were to get approved, it's somebody the president would like to have on the bench, and if she were to be held up it's somebody who would probably face the least possible disruption. there's a human cost to all of this when somebody gets no. ed and they know they're being thrown into a fight that's unlikely to be won. perhaps there would be some humanity in the choice, finding somebody who both would be a good justice and somebody who if they were caught in the maw of the senate would not see a huge disruption. >> quick break here. tom goldstein, thank you very much for joining us tonight. really appreciate it. >> thanks so much. up next, donald trump versus
7:17 pm
the brothers bush. [ music ] defiance is in our bones. citracal pearls. delicious berries and cream. soft, chewable, calcium plus vitamin d. only from citracal. they say that in life, we shouldn't sweat the small stuff. but when you're building a mercedes-benz, there really is no small stuff. every decision... every component... is an integral part of what makes the 2016 c-class one of our most sophisticated cars ever. because when you're setting a new benchmark for refinement, it is the small stuff... that makes the biggest impression. the 2016 c-class. lease the c300 for $399 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer. i'm here to get the lady of the house back on her feet. and give her the strength
7:18 pm
and energy to stay healthy. who's with me?! yay! the complete balanced nutrition of great tasting ensure. with 9 grams of protein and 26 vitamins and minerals. ensure. take life in! man 1: he just got fired. man 2: why? man 1: network breach. man 2: since when do they fire ceos for computer problems? man 1: they got in through a vendor. man 1: do you know how many vendors have access to our systems? man 2: no. man 1: hundreds, if you don't count the freelancers. man 2: should i be worried? man 1: you are the ceo. it's not just security. it's defense. bae systems.
7:19 pm
remember that democratic debate where bernie sanders called hillary clinton a liar and then hillary clinton called bernie sanders a liar and then he called her a liar and -- no, i know. because it never happened. imagine if bernie or hillary just used that word liar, liar against the other one even once in a democratic debate. that would be the nuclear bomb of the democratic campaign. did you lose count saturday night of how many times republicans called each other liars on that debate stage? we kept count. we're going to show it to you coming up. medicare part d prescriptions, walgreens says, carpe med diem.
7:20 pm
seize the day to get more out of life and medicare part d. just switch to walgreens for savings that'll be the highlight of your day. now preview the cost of your copay before you fill. you can even get one-dollar copays on select plans. (man) hmm. ♪hat do you think? (stranger) good mornin'! ♪ (store p.a.) attention shoppers, there's a lost couple in the men's department. (vo) there's a great big un-khaki world out there. explore it in a subaru crosstrek. love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru.
7:21 pm
in a move that we weren't sure we would ever see, president george w. bush came out of political retirement tonight to campaign for his brother. the essence of his pitch for jeb was who do you want in the presidency if the united states is attacked again? >> when americans woke up on september the 11th, we did not know that the world would forever change that day. i was sitting in a classroom in florida listening to a child read. my chief of staff, south carolina graduate andy card, whispered in my ear "a second
7:22 pm
plane has hit the second tower. america is under attack." my first reaction is i was hot. we're going to deal with these people. my second reaction when i was staring at this young child, is my job became crystal clear. and that is to protect her, her community, and her country. [ cheers and applause ] on the way to air force one from that school condi called me and said a plane has hit the pentagon. i felt the first one was an accident, the second was an attack, and the third one was a declaration of war. i became something that no president should ever want to be, a wartime president. and i made a lot of tough calls. every one of them with that child's image in my mind. to protect her and the country
7:23 pm
she's fortunate enough to call home. [ cheers and applause ] i've seen jeb in action. he'll be a strong and steady hand when confronted with the unexpected. >> joining us now, robert costa, national political reporter for the "washington post" and nbc political analyst david frum is back with us. what is the calculation by the bush campaign here? was this a long-planned unveiling of george w. bush in south carolina or have events forced this? >> it's more of the latter, lawrence. you talk to the bush campaign and you get a sense that for months the former florida governor has been trying to run his own campaign, he hasn't even used his family's surname in his campaign ads or on his signs, but right now is a moment where he has to win. this is a state that helped revive his brother's campaign in 2000, that supported president
7:24 pm
george w. bush throughout his administration, and if jeb bush cannot win here in south carolina on saturday it's very hard to see a path forward. so now they're embracing the bush legacy, thinking that hawkish impulse that still resides, especially in the south carolina electorate, could help the governor. >> let's listen to how george w. bush went directly after donald trump without mentioning trump's name. >> strength is not empty rhetoric. it is not bluster. it is not theatrics. real strength, strength of purpose, comes from integrity and character. and in my experience the strongest person usually isn't the loudest one in the room. [ cheers and applause ] >> david frum, no question whoa was talking about there. >> right. well, look, the bush family has a special feeling about south carolina. it saved the elder bush's nomination in 1988. it saved the younger bush's nomination in 2000.
7:25 pm
but it's a different state today. south carolina's the second largest net in migration state of any of the states of voters from other places. so a huge proportion of the electorate
7:26 pm
[ cheers and applause ] we need someone who can fix the problems that cause our anger and frustration, and that's jeb bush. [ cheers and applause ] >> robert costa, the estimates i heard were about 3,000 people for this. that is maybe jeb bush's biggest crowd of the campaign. it used to be what we thought was a big crowd in presidential campaigning before bernie sanders, donald trump, and for that matter barack obama eight years ago. but tonight according to that audience, this is about as good as it's going to get for jeb bush in south carolina. >> tonight's event for governor bush, it felt like a homecoming for him and his associates. they were excited about seeing the former president. they thought this is someone
7:27 pm
returning to the stage-l help remind republican voters to come back into the fold, to come back toward the bush family. but lawrence, this is a very different party than the party george w. bush left in 2009. this is a party that has endured a tea party wave, that has become less ideological, more populist, more frustrated with the institutions, including the institution of the republican party. there's an open question of just how many voters are really willing and excited about coming back to the bush family. when you look at the popularity of the iraq war, even within republican ranks, there are questions about whether it was the right enterprise at the right time. respect for the president, respect for george w. bush, you see his popularity still high but not entirely for the decisions he made. >> and david frum, this is a former president who the front-runner for the republican nomination has said should have been impeached. it's a former president who the front-runner said in the debate saturday night lied and lied about -- sent america to war
7:28 pm
over a lie. >> it's astonishing, isn't it? no democrat, not even howard dean, not general wesley clark, who was so hot in 2004, no democrat has talked about george bush as harshly as donald trump has done. and how much of that is calculated? how much of that is a ploy by donald trump? because donald trump cannot win a two-person race. if it's donald trump against marco rubio or against ted cruz, donald trump loses. but if he can goad jeb bush into staying, he keeps the race as a three, four, five-person race and that's where he racks up delegates. 11 -- bob will know better than me. about 1100 delegates will be chosen before we ever get to florida and that is donald trump's moment. >> david frum, thank you very much for joining us tonight. really appreciate it. >> thank you. >> up next, the most uncontrollable liar in the history of presidential campaigning thinks the other guys are lying more than he is. that's next. pet moments are beautiful, unless you have allergies.
7:29 pm
then your eyes may see it differently. only flonase is approved to relieve both your itchy, watery eyes and congestion. no other nasal allergy spray can say that. complete allergy relief or incomplete. let your eyes decide. flonase changes everything. companies must adapt.changing environment, but one thing should remain constant - a financial relationship with someone that understands and cares about your business. pnc corporate and institutional banking offers strategies tailored to your company's needs.
7:30 pm
know that our dedicated teams of local experts offer insight to help you achieve your business objectives. see how working with pnc can help your company grow at ♪ frodoers don't stop. wake up, every day is a chance to do something great. and for the ones they love, they'd do anything. sears optical has glasses made for doing. right now, buy one pair and get another free. quality eyewear for doers. sears optical. so i asked about adding once-daily namenda xr to her current treatment for moderate to severe alzheimer's. it works differently. when added to another alzheimer's treatment, it may improve overall function and cognition. and may slow the worsening of symptoms for a while. (announcer) namenda xr doesn't change how the disease progresses. it shouldn't be taken by anyone allergic to memantine, or who's had a bad reaction to namenda xr or its ingredients.
7:31 pm
before starting treatment, tell their doctor if they have, or ever had a seizure disorder, difficulty passing urine, liver, kidney, or bladder problems, and about medications they're taking. certain medications, changes in diet, or medical conditions may affect the amount of namenda xr in the body and may increase side effects. the most common side effects are headache, diarrhea, and dizziness. all my life, he's protected me. ask their doctor about once-daily namenda xr and learn about a free trial offer at they say you shouldn't spoil your kids. but your grandkids? how about front row seats to the best show in town? and that is why you invest. the best returns aren't just measured in dollars. td ameritrade®. hey how's it going, hotcakes? hotcakes.
7:32 pm
this place has hotcakes. so why aren't they selling like hotcakes? with comcast business internet and wifi pro, they could be. just add a customized message to your wifi pro splash page and you'll reach your customers where their eyes are already - on their devices. order up. it's more than just wifi, it can help grow your business. you don't see that every day. introducing wifi pro, wifi that helps grow your business. comcast business. built for business. i have never, ever met a person that lies more than ted cruz. i have never, ever seen anything like it. as i said, he's the single worst liar i've ever seen. >> that was donald trump on his liar liar campaign in charleston, south carolina today. four years ago the republican candidates actually got through a bunch of debates without ever calling each other liars.
7:33 pm
but saturday night they couldn't stop using that word. first donald trump went after george w. bush, who he considers virtually indistinguishable from his opponent jeb bush. >> i want to tell you, they lied. they said there were weapons of mass destruction. there were none. and they knew there were none. there were no weapons of mass destruction. >> and then marco rubio hit ted cruz. >> look, this is a disturbing pattern now. because for a number of weeks ted cruz has just been telling lies. he lied about ben carson in iowa. he lies about planned parenthood. he lies about marriage. he's lying about all sorts of things. >> and for his part ted cruz kept it remarkably classy, by refusing to say that marco rubio lied. he just said that what marco rubio said was absolutely false. ted cruz never used the word "lie" in any form. but that didn't stop donald
7:34 pm
trump from calling him a liar. >> you are the single biggest liar -- you probably are worse than jeb bush. you are the single biggest liar. >> you notice trump threw jeb bush in there while he was hitting ted cruz. donald trump showed us what he would be like as a debate moderator. he would have only one question for ted cruz. >> i did not nominate john roberts. i would not have nominated -- >> you pushed him. you pushed him. you worked with him and you pushed him. why do you lie? >> donald -- >> why do you lie? >> adults learn not to interrupt people. >> and the wildest liar in the video recorded history of presidential campaigning went after jeb bush once again when jeb bush talked about donald trump's multiple business bankruptcies. >> because he could use the legal system. >> let me respond. that's another lie. i never went bankrupt. it's another lie. no, but it's a lie. this guy, he doesn't know what he's talking about. >> we need someone with a proven
7:35 pm
record -- >> now, notice that there are no arrows to or from john kasich or ben carson down at the other end there. those guys stayed out of the liar line of fire. the liar liar campaign continued today. >> i like both donald and marco. but it is a very odd reaction when somebody points to their record, points to the words that came out of their own mouth, for them simply to respond by yelling and screaming liar liar liar. truth matters. and we're not in grade school where you just get to say liar liar pants on fire and not respond to the substance. >> it's saying things that aren't true. and something that isn't true you that keep saying, there's no other word for it but lie. he's lied about my position on marriage, lied about my position on planned parenthood, lied about his own record on immigration. and you can't just make things up. >> joining us now, mirella
7:36 pm
teresa kumar, president of vote latino. and robert costa is still with us. maria teresa, that ted cruz going on about liar liar pants on fire and all that reduces the entire campaign -- he may think that that works as a way of mocking donald trump. but it makes the entire campaign of all of them look ridiculous. >> well, i think a lot of folks are not going to remember the campaign of 2006 when the congress lost -- the republicans lost the house back to the democrats. in exit polls the number one reason that people actually basically ousted the republicans was because they didn't trust them. they actually said that they thought they were -- the american people thought that they were lying to them. so this word, this idea of trust, this idea that you are lying to me, it weighs very heavily on the electorate. so i think that the republican party has a bigger problem because i think right now if you were to poll the majority of americans and say do you think any of these candidates are telling you the truth the
7:37 pm
majority of them are going to say i don't. >> i want to show an example of how having multiple players on the stage helps donald trump so much because no matter what he says, no one lies like donald trump. he breathes lies. and they are unnecessary lies. they just -- >> you're joining in on the debate now, lawrence. >> no, they come constantly. listen to him talking about losing, as he put it, losing hundreds of friends on 9/11. let's listen to this. >> george w. bush enforced what the international community refused to do, and again, he kept us safe, and i am forever grate tofl what he did for -- >> how did he keep us safe when the world trade center came down? [ cheers and boos ] the world -- excuse me. i lost hundreds of friends. the world trade center came down during the reign of george bush. he kept us safe? that's not safe. >> now, in a one-on-one debate you could isolate that comment about losing hundreds of friends and ask him about that. but in the space of time they have there that really couldn't
7:38 pm
happen. and robert, i tweeted immediately that he was lying about that, that he did not lose hundreds of friends on 9/11. and the next morning he switched it. he moved it back to many, many friends. we don't have any evidence right now about what friends, if any, donald trump lost on 9/11. but that's the kind of stuff that he does constantly without anybody trying to check him. >> it's striking how donald trump has used 9/11 in his campaign, how he has spoken about 9/11. in the last debate of course he's really taking himself away from the republican mainstream and the republican establishment more specifically in how they interpret the iraq war, saying 9/11 was really partly a republican responsibility, that there was not enough people on watch. and that's really more in the rand paul libertarian wing of the party. that view is now creeping into the more mainstream because the
7:39 pm
front-runner is espousing it. but you could also say 9/11 trump at the previous debate when he talked about new york values and interacted with senator cruz that was one of his better moments. so it's just -- it's interesting to see how this is playing such a central role in his campaign in both defining where he is on foreign policy and understanding who he is as a person. but you're right, on the fact check, lawrence, i have not spoken to donald trump about who specifically he knew who was lost that day. >> maria teresa, i saw a lot of cheering for donald trump from liberals saturday night live-tweeting that debate when he went after the bush administration on 9/11 saying what others have said but no republican's ever said before. how can you say the bush administration kept us safe if 9/11 happened on their watch? >> well, i think part of it is because the american memory unfortunately is very short and you have a lot of folks, a lot of republicans who seem to forget it did happen under a
7:40 pm
republican administration and they want to actually shoulder the burden of the war and the cost of war fully on the shoulders of president obama and that's just not the case. but i think the republican party has a problem. trump looks likes he's going to win south carolina. they're going to have to go behind closed doors and try to figure out who of those left on stage yesterday are basically going to be in a position to coalesce under one candidate? because if they keep having the same candidates right now, jeb, marco, cruz, and kasich and carson, if they keep splitting themselves that way trump actually has a chance of being the nominee. and i don't think that's what they want. the establishment basically has to coalesce and broker a deal and get themselves behind one candidate. >> robert costa, quickly, is it too late to make that move? even assume for a moment all the egos could be buried in one room and they could emerge with one person to go out there and carry the challenge against trump the rest of the way. would it be too late for that move to be made now? >> it's not too late because
7:41 pm
this could be an extended fight, lawrence, over the delegates and trump still needs to get over 1200 to get that nomination. so there's talk in public that used to be private about a brokered convention. but if he storms through south carolina and goes into the deep south, it has to be a two-person race or close to it by mid march or it's going to be very difficult to see how trump would be stopped. >> robert costa, thank you very much for joining us tonight. really appreciate it. >> thank you. >> just five days away from the nevada caucus, and the democratic polls there are showing what we showed, what we saw happen before iowa, a real tightening of the race there. it's coming up. before i had the shooting, burning, pins-and-needles of diabetic nerve pain,
7:42 pm
these feet served my country, carried the weight of a family, and walked a daughter down the aisle. but i couldn't bear my diabetic nerve pain any longer. so i talked to my doctor and he prescribed lyrica. nerve damage from diabetes causes diabetic nerve pain. lyrica is fda approved to treat this pain. from moderate to even severe diabetic nerve pain. lyrica may cause serious allergic reactions or suicidal thoughts or actions. tell your doctor right away if you have these, new or worsening depression, or unusual changes in mood or behavior. or swelling, trouble breathing, rash, hives, blisters, muscle pain with fever, tired feeling or blurry vision. common side effects are dizziness, sleepiness, weight gain and swelling of hands, legs, and feet. don't drink alcohol while taking lyrica. don't drive or use machinery until you know how lyrica affects you. those who have had a drug or alcohol problem may be more likely to misuse lyrica. now i have less diabetic nerve pain. and my biggest reason to walk calls me grandpa. ask your doctor about lyrica. now there's simply ageless liquid makeup
7:43 pm
it helps you look younger in three ways. so in the future when you're older you look younger. simply ageless from olay... and easy, breezy... ... beautiful covergirl then your eyes may see it, differently.ave allergies. only flonase is approved to relieve both your itchy, watery eyes and congestion. no other nasal allergy spray can say that. complete allergy relief or incomplete. let your eyes decide. flonase changes everything. they say that in life, we shouldn't sweat the small stuff. but when you're building a mercedes-benz, there really is no small stuff. every decision... every component... is an integral part of what makes the 2016 c-class one of our most sophisticated cars ever. because when you're setting a new benchmark for refinement, it is the small stuff... that makes the biggest impression. the 2016 c-class. lease the c300 for $399 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer.
7:44 pm
seems like you're nervous about nav nav right now. should they snb. >> it's a caucus. anytime you've got a caucus it's more unpredictable. >> translation, the clinton campaign is nervous. with just five days until the nevada democratic caucus bill clinton stepped in for hillary clinton at a florida rally while she decided to stay in nevada in hopes of swaying more voters in her direction. in the latest poll hillary clinton and bernie sanders are
7:45 pm
he tied at 35% in nevada, 9% undecided and according to the latest forecast by nate silver's five thirty eight blog hillary clinton and bernie sanders both have a 50% chance of winning saturday's nevada caucus. back with us, jonathan allen and maria teresa kumar. maria teresa, that five thirty eight number saying 50% chance for each one of them is pretty striking. >> it's shocking since hillary's had such a machine there since 2008. i have to share with you, i was in nevada on thursday and i was talking to two young latino business owners and i asked them if they were going to caucus. one said yes because of the work that vote latino is doing. one said no. my follow-up question was has anybody reached out to you from the campaigns? they said no one had reached out to them. so i think they're going after individuals that are usual suspects to caucus but they're not actually trying to identify new people to bring in. and that is going to be the strategy i think that bernieie sanders does much better than hillary. >> jonathan allen, if this
7:46 pm
outcome is roughly a 50-50 outcome for nevada what is the importance of that in this story? >> it means bernie sanders still has momentum and it means he's got another caucus state that he's done well in. and it will take away some of that mystique of hillary clinton being expected to do so much better among latino voters and in states with significant minority populations and it may start to have a cascading effect. look, i have talked to sources in clinton world of late about nevada and none of them are trying to talk about nevada. they're worried about it. they would much rather talk about south carolina, where they believe a big african-american turnout is going to help hillary clinton win big there. but they know even though they're not talking about it that nevada comes first. >> jonathan allen and maria teresa kumar, thank you both for joining us tonight. appreciate it. >> take care. >> appreciate it. coming up, donald trump is at it again. threatening to sue ted cruz.
7:47 pm
listen up! i'm here to get the lady of the house back on her feet. and give her the strength and energy to stay healthy. who's with me?! yay! the complete balanced nutrition of great tasting ensure. with 9 grams of protein and 26 vitamins and minerals. ensure. take life in! at safelite,oh nonow how busy your life can be. this mom didn't have time to worry about a cracked windshield. so she scheduled at and with safelite's exclusive "on my way text" she knew exactly when i'd be there. hi, steve with safelite. thanks for your text! i replaced her windshield... and she didn't miss a single shot
7:48 pm
giving you more time for what matters most. how'd ya do? we won! nice! that' another safelite advantage. thank you so much! (team sing) ♪safelite repair, safelite replace.♪ if youthen you'll know howouth, uncomfortable it can be. but did you know that the lack of saliva can also lead to tooth decay and bad breath? well, there is biotene, specially formulated with moisturizers and lubricants. biotene can provide soothing relief and it helps keep your mouth healthy too. biotene, for people who suffer from a dry mouth. isn't it time to let the real you shine through? e to severe plaque psoriasis... introducing otezla, apremilast. otezla is not an injection, or a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. some people who took otezla saw 75% clearer skin after 4 months.
7:49 pm
and otezla's prescribing information has no requirement for routine lab monitoring. don't take otezla if you are allergic to any of its ingredients. otezla may increase the risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts, or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. side effects may include diarrhea, nausea, upper respiratory tract infection, and headache. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take, and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ask your dermatologist about otezla today. when your allergy symptoms start... i've been claritin clear for 14 days. ...doctors recommend taking one claritin every day of your allergy season... ...for continuous relief. with powerful, 24 hour... ...non-drowsy claritin, live claritin clear. every day.
7:50 pm
america's opening to cuba is now just big enough to drive a very small tractor through it. an alabama-based tractor company was notified by the u.s. treasury department last week that they will be able to open and operate a factory in cuba. this is the first significant u.s. business investment in the country since fidel castro took power more than 50 years ago. the small company hopes to begin operation in 2017. they intend to assemble approximately 1,000 small tractors per year to sell to cuban farmers. coming up, donald trump's latest threat to ted cruz. you do all this research on a perfect car,
7:51 pm
then smash it into a tree. your insurance company raises your rates... maybe you should've done more research on them. for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. liberty mutual insurance. try cool mint zantac. hey, need fast heartburn relief? it releases a cooling sensation in your mouth and throat. zantac works in as little as 30 minutes. nexium can take 24 hours. try cool mint zantac. no pill relieves heartburn faster.
7:52 pm
hey how's it going, hotcakes? hotcakes. this place has hotcakes. so why aren't they selling like hotcakes? with comcast business internet and wifi pro, they could be. just add a customized message to your wifi pro splash page and you'll reach your customers where their eyes are already - on their devices. order up. it's more than just wifi, it can help grow your business. you don't see that every day. introducing wifi pro, wifi that helps grow your business. comcast business. built for business. we've got something hot off the campaign wire for you. minutes ago at michigan state
7:53 pm
university this happened. >> okay. yes, sir. yes. yes, sir. the jack black of michigan state. [ applause ] >> hi. i'm dr. robert lo duca, associate dean of the lyman briggs college of science and chemistry. >> nice to see you all. see you the next time. thank you. >> okay. first of all, jack black played a teacher in "school of rock." and surely he could play an associate dean scientist guy at michigan state. okay. a mad scientist. we'll be right back. ns of proto. hundreds of crash simulations. thousands of hours of painstaking craftsmanship. and an infinite reserve of patience... create a vehicle that looks, drives and thinks like nothing else on the road.
7:54 pm
the all-new glc. the suv the world has been waiting for. starting at $38,950. this just got interesting. so why pause to take a pill? and why stop to find a bathroom? with cialis for daily use, you don't have to plan around either. it's the only daily tablet approved to treat erectile dysfunction so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. plus cialis treats the frustrating urinary symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently, day or night. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, or adempas for pulmonary hypertension, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or any symptoms of an allergic reaction,
7:55 pm
stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. why pause the moment? ask your doctor about cialis for daily use. and for a $200 savings card, go to i'm going to bring a lawsuit because in my opinion based on what i've learned over the last two, three days from very top lawyers, he doesn't even have the right to serve as president or even run as president. he was born in canada. >> now that donald trump is campaigning far from the canadian border he's once again going after 2ed cruz's eligibility to serve as president of the united states. while he was campaigning to win the new hampshire primary, trump barely mentioned ted cruz's canadian roots since there are so many families in new hampshire with histories on both sides of the canadian border. joining us now, rick hassan, professor of law and political science at the university of
7:56 pm
california at irvine. professor hassan, there's donald trump threatening to sue again. he does this all the time. most of the time he doesn't sue when he threatens to sue. but in this instance is he an injured party who would therefore have standing to bring a lawsuit questioning ted cruz's citizenship eligibility to be president of the united states? >> he may well have standing. in order to get into federal court you've got to show that you have an injury. and there are cases including in the 9th circuit if he wants to sue out here in the west that say that if you're going to have to spend more money to compete against someone who is running against you, that gives you enough of a stake to be able to bring your lawsuit, trying to get somebody kicked off the ballot. >> now, can he forum shop? it hadn't occurred to me before that he might be able to choose which federal district he wants to bring this case in. >> well, i think what he'd probably do is bring a suit against either a secretary of state or a local election
7:57 pm
official who's decided to put ted cruz's name on the ballot, ted cruz has qualified to appear on the ballot and he's going to say that decision is wrong, you're not allowed to do that, and i think he could -- he could sue in state court too and in state court the standing rules are even looser in some states. i think he can go just about anywhere in the country where cruz is going to run for election and where the election hasn't already taken place. >> now, let's talk about the speed of this kind of litigation since what's at issue is so important, so crucially important for the future of the country. how fast could this move through the appeals process to the united states supreme court? >> well, to begin with, he may be too late in suing in some places. like nevada we're having a caucus coming right up. it's too late to sue there. he's got to time it just right. it's got to be in enough time to change the ballots. but courts often put election litigation on a fast track. and when they put it on the fast track, it could get from a district court to an appeals court and even to the supreme court in a matter of weeks.
7:58 pm
it's possible. of course at the supreme court we don't know what would happen these days. >> well, i mean, let's speculate on this. this is a completely different conversation than you and i would have had last week about this. this would now go to a 4-4, possibly 4-4 opinion in the supreme court. what happens in this new scenario in the eight-person supreme court? >> well, i don't know that this is an issue that the court would divide 4-4, but if they did divide 4-4, then whatever the last court, the lower court, could be the 9th circuit or it could be a state supreme court or another circuit, whatever they decide would be final. when the court can't -- when the court divides evenly, it's the lower court ruling that stands. >> so if trump were forum shopping, which circuit in the country do you think would be most favorable to him in this situation? >> well, you know, there have been some arguments saying that if you take an originalist view of the constitution, the kind that justice scalia took, that you might say that cruz is not
7:59 pm
eligible. so you might look in more conservative circuits. you might look in the 5th circuit where texas is, where there are a number of conservative judges. that might be where i would look if i had to pick a federal court to go after. but there may be a state court that may be more hospitable to such a claim. >> and is the state court -- but is the state court route a slower route to the supreme court? >> well, again, all of these things there are procedures for emergency kind of hearing election appeals. so i think -- remember, bush versus gore came from a state court, it went up in a matter of days. so it could happen. >> yeah. rick hasen, this one is all the more fascinating this week than it was last week now that we have that eight-person supreme court to ponder as this thing could be head there'd. professor rich hasen, thank you very much for joining us. really appreciate it. >> thank you. >> chris hayes is up next.
8:00 pm
tonight on "all in". >> if the democrats want to replace this nominee, they need to win this election. >> obama justice should not be appointed in an election year. >> what president obama plans to do and how republicans are plotting to stop him. thenning back to the future. >> i've been misunderestimated most of my life. >> the return of w greeted with


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on