tv Meet the Press MSNBC February 15, 2021 1:00am-2:00am PST
so far this year is continuing that trend. noah says that last month was the seventh warmest january on record for the planet. it was also the 433rd month in a row, 433, that had that had temperatures above the 20th century av rajs. this sunday, acquitted. >> donald john trump former president of the united states is not guilty as charged in the article of impeachment. >> a divided senate votes 57-43 to convict former president trump. ten votes fewer than needed. >> the failure to convict donald trump will live as a vote in infamy. >> mitch mcconnell votes to acquit. but -- >> former president trump's actions preceding the riot were a disgraceful, disgraceful dereliction of duty. >> the most bipartisan impeachment vote in u.s. history. >> he incited that mob. he lit the match. come on.
get real. we know that this is what happened. >> this impeachment is completely divorced from the facts, the evidence, and the interest of the american people. >> but the former president's party stands by their man. >> i think most republicans found the presentation by the house managers offensive and absurd. >> how closely has the gop now tied itself to mr. trump and his behavior. my guests this morning, the top democratic impeachment manager, jamie raskin, republican governor larry hogan of maryland, and democratic whip, senator dick durbin of illinois. plus, the cdc announces new guidelines on opening schools and the biden administration secures 200 million more vaccine doses. i'll talk to the new director of the cdc, rochelle walensky. joining me for insight and analysis are nbc news capitol hill correspondent kasie hunt, former democratic senator of missouri, claire mccaskill, former republican congressman of
florida, carlos curbelo, and audie cornish, host of npr's "all things considered." welcome to sunday. it's "meet the press." >> announcer: from nbc news in washington, the longest running show in television history. this is "meet the press" with chuck todd. >> and a good sunday morning. during the 2016 presidential campaign, donald trump made what may be the most accurate public statement he's ever made. >> i could stand in the middle of fifth avenue and shoot somebody and i wouldn't lose any voters, okay? it's like incredible. >> yesterday, senate republicans largely proved him right. 43 of 50 republican senators voted to absolve mr. trump of responsibility for the deadly january 6th riot at the capitol. the final tally was 57-43 to convict, ten votes shy of the 67 needed.
this was after democrats read into the record congresswoman jaime herrera beutler's statement that president trump sided with the mob in a call to kevin mccarthy as the riot was under way. it was after democrats made the but-for case, that but for president trump, there would have been january 6th, no mob storming the capitol, no threats to the lives of vice president mike pence, speaker nancy pelosi, or any members of congress the rioters could find. the former president released a statement last night saying in part, this has been yet another phase of the greatest witch hunt in the history of our country. no president has ever gone through anything like it. whether donald trump proves to be an anchor or albatross for his party is up for debate. what is not up for debate is that the republican party now runs the risk of being defined by those terrible images of january 6th.
there's no doubt many republicans sincerely believe the trial was unconstitutional or just another partisan attack. but herrera beutler's story gave the party's intuitionalists, yet another of the many exit ramps we've been offered from the former president. but instead, they voted to stick with him again wherever that leads. >> the ayes are 57, the nays are 43. >> in a crystallization of four years of repeated decisions to condone mr. trump's conduct, on saturday, senate republicans overwhelmingly voted to acquit him of the charge he incited the violence that left five people dead. even republicans who criticized the president's conduct voted in his favor. >> president trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office. he didn't get away with anything yet, yet. >> with just seven republicans voting to convict -- >> his actions, they interfere with the peaceful transition of power, the hallmark of our constitution and our american democracy were an abuse of power. >> i voted to convict president trump because he is guilty.
>> the vote followed the plot twist on saturday. >> we would like the opportunity to subpoena congresswoman herrera beutler. >> congresswoman jaime herrera beutler said in a statement as the attack unfolded, mr. trump sided with the rioters in a contentious call when republican leader kevin mccarthy saying, well, kevin, i guess these people are more upset about the election than you are. it was a week of emotional testimony and video evidence linking the former president to the insurrection. >> donald trump, yes! dude, dude. let's tell trump what's up. >> trump would be very upset right now. >> he would be like -- just say we love them. we love you, bro. he'll be happy. what do you mean? >> newly released evidence of the assault on law enforcement just after vice president pence was evacuated from the senate chamber, his life in danger, mr. trump attacked pence on twitter. >> he still sent out a tweet attacking him, further inciting the very mob.
>> the president's lawyers attacked the idea that mr. trump's use of the word "fight" incited the crowd, playing an edited montage of democrats saying the word. >> we're in the fight of our lives. >> we fight like hell. >> and charged democrats for hypocrisy for not condemning the sometimes violent protests last summer. from the start, the outcome of the trial appeared one-sided with republican senators adopting the same language they used to defend mr. trump the same time. >> they rushed into the process. >> they rushed into an impeachment. think about it. there was no due process. >> seen a whole lot of table banging. >> i think you're going to see a lot of partisan table pounding. >> most of the evidence is hearsay. >> this is not evidence. this is a liberal democratic novel being presented as evidence. >> joining me now is the lead democratic impeachment manager, congressman jamie raskin of maryland. congressman raskin, welcome to "meet the press."
>> good morning. thanks for having me. >> so this feels like one of those -- the glass -- the water glass metaphor, is it half empty or half full? you got seven republicans to convict. mitch mcconnell felt like he used your closing argument to make his repudiation even though he voted to acquit. so do you feel like this was a success, or do you feel like because you failed to convict, that you can't look at it any other way than a failure? >> well, i think it was a dramatic success in historical terms. it was the largest impeachment conviction vote in u.s. history. it was by far the most bipartisan majority that's ever assembled in the senate to convict a president, which has traditionally been a kind of partisan thing in american history. we got seven republicans, and if you look at the ten republicans in the house who joined us, it was by far the most bipartisan decision and a complete
repudiation of the president's conduct. now, unfortunately, it didn't reach the two-thirds majority in the senate. we're explaining this to foreign journalists who can't understand why he wasn't convicted with a 57-43 vote. well, you need two-thirds. i think we successfully prosecuted him and convicted him in the court of public opinion and in the court of history. he's obviously a major political problem for the republican party. and as long as he's out there attempting to wage war on american constitutional democracy, he's a problem for all of us. >> he's showing no remorse with this acquittal. and by -- what have we done? have we now given a permission slip to political violence in our everyday politics? >> well, certainly those 43 republicans in the senate shamefully did that. a number of them, including senator mcconnell, are aggressively trying to disentangle themselves from the
vote. mcconnell went right to the floor to say he was convinced that donald trump was morally and physically responsible for this attack. i would have liked to have had him on the impeachment manager's team based on the way he presented that, except then he went back to the completely counterfeit argument that the senate couldn't conduct a trial of trump's impeachment, although, he was impeached during his presidency for acts committed during his presidency. i think we showed the dissatisfaction of the country, that that was done when the country first started. it was done in the belknap decision after the civil war and there's no problem with it. yet, they decided to hang their hat on that very dubious hook in order to basically cater to trump and the forces within the party that are still loyal to him in a really cultish and dangerous way. >> i want to get to three specific what-ifs, okay, or back
seat driving people might be doing. maybe you're doing it to yourself. what if number one is this: when it was clear that the trial wasn't going to start until after joe biden was inaugurated, was there any thought of taking an extra week, an extra two weeks before starting the trial for you to do more investigating? >> well, actually we did take an extra two weeks. it was supposed to start before that. nobody said to us -- nobody on any side -- that we didn't make our case. it was absolutely overwhelming and meticulous and comprehensive. i don't think anybody can watch that without coming away saying donald trump incited that violent insurrection. he named the date of the rally, the time of the rally. it was timed with the counting of electoral college votes. he said stop the steal and he basically fired the cannon of the rally goers right at the capitol. look, when you listen to what mcconnell said or what senator capito of west virginia said, they said the facts are there. they would have found some
way -- you can always slice the baloney real fine to come up with some way to acquit somebody if that's what you want to do. in fact, that was the whole strategy of our opposition counsel. they were saying, you can pick due process, first amendment, just pick one reason to let him go. 43 republicans did. >> okay. on witnesses, it seems as if this was a last-minute decision to go ahead and try to call jaime herrera beutler. should you have had a witness planned much sooner that might have included mike pence, kevin mccarthy, jaime herrera beutler, people like that? >> let's start with jaime herrera beutler. she issued her statement the day before.
we tried mightily to get in touch with her. she could have come and done an interview. we couldn't get through to her. so we did seek permission to do it -- >> i don't mean to interrupt you. can i interrupt you real quick? >> please. >> her story was known for weeks. why did you not try to contact her until the last couple days? >> she issued her statement the day before, and we brought up the resolution right at the time that the resolutions for witnesses for called for according to the senate resolution. there's no other time we could have done it. that was the moment to do it. we won that vote. we were going to proceed to do it. hen the republicans stipulated to allow the evidence to come into the record. you asked about some other people who might have gotten up there and lied. we don't know what kevin mccarthy would have said. that was her record of what he was telling people. what he had told people was that he called trump to say, you've got to get us out of this hell, they're here. trump said it's antifa. mccarthy said, no, it's your people, you've got to get us out of here. trump said something like, well, maybe they just care more about
the election than you do. i.e., trump knew exactly what they were doing, knew that mob was there occupying people's offices and threatening congress. so it was there for everybody to see. >> right. >> so we could have had a thousand witnesses, but that could not have overcome the kinds of silly arguments that people like mcconnell and capito were hanging their hats on. >> one more of those what-ifs. insurrection versus dereliction of duty. i know you made a pretty compelling argument in your closing argument about how you couldn't disaggregate them. if it had been dereliction of duty, it looks like you might have gotten two or three others. >> you know, remember, these republicans who voted to acquit in the face of this mountain of unrefuted evidence were going to find some reason to do it. so if we had charged dereliction of duty, they would have said, that's not an impeachable offense, i don't view to deal with that in the military system, the president is not bound by the uniform code of military justice and so on.
i mean, you can always come up with a lawyer's argument to get to where you want to go. they did not honestly confront the reality of what happened to america, which was donald trump incited a violent mob to attack the congress of the united states. you know what? we have no regrets at all. we left it totally out there on the floor of the u.s. senate, and every senator knew exactly what happened. just go back and listen to mcconnell's speech. everybody was convinced of the case we put forward. as the defense lawyer said, just pick any one of these phony constitutional defenses and then you can justify it. it can be first amendment, due process. all of them are nonsense. i thought i successfully demolished them at the trial. but, you know, there's no reasoning with people who basically are acting like members of a religious cult and when they leave office should be selling flowers at dulles airport. >> congressman jamie raskin, i hope you know that many of us are grieving and mourning with
you and sarah and your family. it's never going to get easier. with that, i appreciate you coming on and sharing with us this morning. >> thank you for your kindness. i want everybody to hang tough for democracy. we won on a vote of 57-43, although, we didn't make it to two-thirds. there are a lot of patriots out there hanging tough for the constitution. >> all right, thank you very much. joining me now, the number two democratic in the senate, dick durbin. senator durbin, welcome back to "meet the press." let me start with what nancy pelosi said about mitch mcconnell's statement right after he made it yesterday. let me play it for you, sir. >> he was hedging all over the place. i don't know whether it was for donors or what, but whatever it was, it was a very disingenuous speech. i say that regretfully because i always want to be able to work with the leadership of the other party. >> did you find senator mcconnell's remarks disingenuous?
>> well, let me say, chuck, at the outset first to jamie raskin and his team, an extraordinarily good job. importantly in the history of our country, they spoke up at the right moment. let me say another word. we were never going to reach 67 votes in the senate without mitch mcconnell voting guilty. so he went on the floor afterwards. he basically gave the speech that jamie raskin would have given to the senate and then tried to justify his vote for acquittal. it wasn't going to happen. we weren't going to reach 67 without him. >> did you find his remarks disingenuous, or do you take him at his word on his belief about the constitutionality of it? >> i tell you what. i think that that argument that we can't impeach someone who is out of office really begs the question. the house managers made the point early on. so that means there's some period in the presidency when
congress cannot respond quickly enough that a president can get away with anything. i don't believe the framers were that careless in writing those sections. history tells us, as jamie raskin just noted, that we have impeached those who have left office. you can't resign your way out of your responsibility. >> in fact, i was going to say, i do feel like maybe what inadvertently has happened is we now have this gap during the transition that apparently january 7th to january 20th, we are lucky donald trump didn't do anything. what would have happened if he did something? is there suddenly no mechanism to have removed him from office if they weren't going to invoke the 25th amendment? >> that's exactly the conclusion that many of the republicans were hanging their hat on, that there was a grace period for the president, no matter what he chose to do. listen, it gets down to this, when you look at it, chuck. many of the republicans were
voting out of loyalty to donald trump. for those who want to know what donald trump's version of loyalty is, i have two words, mike pence. many of them were voting out of fear, what would happen if they went home. i would just ask them to take a reflection on the future of their party which embraces qanon conspiracy and proud boys and shuns cindy mccain and bill cassidy. what's the future of the republican party in that posture? >> we had to report that chris coons visited the house managers and said, look, this drive for witnesses, it could cost some republican conviction votes. some democrats aren't happy with it. was there enough unease with extending this trial that there was motivation to pull the witness request back? >> i don't know what chris did. i didn't follow him or ask him. i saw the same press accounts. but i think the bottom line is this. the evidence was stipulated as to what congresswoman beutler
said. having been stipulated, we knew exactly what she was going to say if she were called for deposition. so i don't think we lost any ground. the facts were before the senate. i think the physical deposition would not have made a significant difference and it would have delayed the proceeding. >> i'm curious. do you feel as if by accelerating the process yesterday, is there going to be a connection with being able to speed up now and deal with the president's relief package? i mean, was there any coupling of that yesterday or not? >> no. we had this coming week, of course, as a recess week for the senate, so we had time. that wasn't the element here. i do want to make this point. we are working with president biden on the priorities of the american people, dealing with this pandemic, dealing with the economy, providing cash payments to american citizens to help them through this tough period. so what we did with this impeachment trial was not at the expense of president biden's priorities. we'll be returning to them quickly when we come back to washington.
>> do we need a 9/11-style commission still about january 6th? >> i can tell you, one of the things that i was looking forward to was making record for history as to what occurred. we still have people, even at the trial, were making claims that antifa was clearly behind it, not trump's people. that was rejected by kevin mccarthy. it's been rejected by the clear evidence presented to us. i want to make sure that soviet-style revisionists on the republican side who are trying to blame everybody but donald trump had a record in front of the american people that was clear. i think jamie raskin and the house managers made that record with clarity even -- let's be honest with you. even mitch mcconnell acknowledged that last night in his speech. so we have that record, and that's the important historic record to show this generation of doubters and any future generation. >> it sounds like you think we've done a big chunk of this investigating. senator dick durbin, democrat
from illinois, thanks for coming on and sharing your perspective with us. >> thanks chuck. joining me now is republican governor of maryland, larry hogan. governor hogan, welcome back to "meet the press." >> good morning. >> you know, you have a special relationship to congress, being the son of a member of congress who voted as a republican on all those impeachment articles against richard nixon. i'm just curious. what did we -- what did the senate do yesterday in terms of donald trump in your view? >> well, you know, there's what the vote was and what the result of the senate -- the republicans in the senate did yesterday. but then there's the court of public opinion. and, quite frankly, i think, you know, the democrats made it a strong case. even though leader mcconnell didn't vote to impeach, his words were pretty strong, and, you know, i think time will tell how that impacts donald trump
and how it impacts the republican party and the country. i think it's going to go far beyond just that vote yesterday in the senate. there's going to be potentially courts of law and the court of public opinion. we're going to decide how history remembers this day and what people did and said. >> would you have voted to convict if you were a united states senator? >> you know, i think the argument was pretty convincing. you know, i wasn't -- i'm not in the senate, but i think i probably would have voted with some of my colleagues that were on the losing side. so i was very proud of some of the folks that stood up and did the right thing. it's not always easy. in fact, it's sometimes really hard to go against your base and your colleagues, to do what you think is right for the country. that's exactly what my dad did back in the '70s. you know, he paid a price for it immediately, but it's what history remembers him most fontly for. >> you know, it's interesting when you look at the number of republicans that voted to
convict. it's 15% of the republican congress. that feels about what the split is in the republican party, 85-15. and the 85 is sitting there with donald trump. is that how you view it? >> well, it's hard to tell. i think this stuff is fluid. let's face it. the president has only been in office now for a month. so we have a long time -- i think there's going to be a real battle for the soul of the republican party, and the battle is just beginning. and i think some of us are going to stand up and try to fight for, you know, the party that we believe in, that we've been a part of for so long, and, you know, there's going to be folks that will want to continue to head down this road of donald trump, and we're going to figure out whether we're going to be a party that can win elections or not. >> where do you have this battle for the soul of the party? you clearly would like to do it inside the party. i know there's some movement of starting a -- sort of a principled conservative third party.
you have adam kinzinger who seems to be more where you are saying, hey, let's plant a flag inside the party. how long do you give the party to find out if you can move the party toward your direction? >> you know, i sort of feel as if there was -- i've said this before. there was a hostile takeover of the republican party. i'm not, for one, not ready to abandon the party i spent my whole life working for that i believe very strongly in going back to being a youth for reagan chairman. i want to return to that party. you know, after watergate, everybody said it was the death of the republican party in 1974. we came back six years later in 1980 with the biggest landslides in history. i'm hoping we can return to a successful party because i think a competitive two-party system is critical to our democracy. >> yeah, but that happened because the republican party chose to distant itself from richard nixon.
do you think the republican party can be successful without distancing itself from donald trump? >> i don't think they can. i think if they really want to win competitive seats in purple states and if they want to win suburban districts, if we want to somehow get back the house and senate, if we want to win a presidential election, they're going to have to start building coalitions like we've done here in one of the bluest states in the country where you can have a message that appeals to more people. >> what is -- let me ask you this. what should -- you know, there was no platform essentially for the republican party in 2020 other than loyalty to donald trump. what do you hope the platform -- what's the platform going to look like in 2024? what do you hope it looks like in 2024? >> well, you know, i wouldn't say there was no platform, and it wasn't really a terrible year for republicans. we obviously lost the presidential race by a wide more engine. however, you know, we made -- it was still a tough battle in the senate. i think the president cost us the two seats in georgia in the senate races.
in the house we actually gained. many people who are like -- from my wing of the party who are commonsense conservatives who are not really strong donald trump supporters, they all won. people like susan collins won, phil scott up in vermont. we picked up a whole lot of house seats in all the suburban districts. so i think the party has a winning message. we just had a bad messenger. and i think we've got to move on from the cult of donald trump and return to the basic principles that the party has always stood for. >> governor larry hogan, republican from maryland, appreciate you coming on and sharing your perspective. as i said, you've known and lived congress in this world for a long time. thanks for coming on. appreciate it. >> thank you, chuck. when we come back, after the trial, where does the gop go from here? panelists next. here?
the panel is with us. nbc news capitol hill correspondent kasie hunt, former democratic senator of missouri, claire mccaskill, former florida representative carlos curbelo, and audie cornish, host of "all things considered." it's been a while. audie, i'll let you get the first crack after this question. was yesterday a good day or bad day for donald trump? >> i think donald trump, no matter what anybody else says about what's going on in the world, had his own vision and reality of what's happened. i think it's pretty clear that in this moment, especially in that speech from senator mitch mcconnell who effectively bent the knee, it's one thing to go out and say a lot of things about a donald trump and be critical in that way, but at the end of the day, it's about actions, votes, and the record. right now when it comes to actions, votes, and the record, donald trump has firm, firm control of the gop. >> carlos, same question to you. >> chuck, i think it was a bad day for donald trump. this was the most bipartisan
impeachment and conviction process in history. and senator mcconnell really laid it out plainly and simply again yesterday after the vote. and i think what he did is so important. you can debate why or not -- why he decided to vote the way he did. obviously he put forward an argument that other constitutional scholars agree with, but after that vote, he did the most important thing that anyone who wants to combat trumpism can do, which is to express simple truths, to make sure the american people and specifically republicans know who donald trump is, what he did, and how he provoked the worst attack on our democracy in our history. that remains there for the record. that is the beginning, chuck, of the process of decoupling donald trump from the republican party. that's what mitch mcconnell started yesterday. i think it was a bad day in the balance for the former president. >> kasie hunt, speaker pelosi's
decision to go after mitch mcconnell for that -- for what he did, calling it disingenuous, i know there's not a lot of love loss between the two, but that can't help things in that relationship. >> there's not a lot of love lost, chuck, but they also know the difference between what they say in public in front of their respective bases of supporters and what they're going to do in private to try and work to get things done. and i'm interested to see if there's a new era between the two of them in the wake of that speech behind the scenes from mitch mcconnell. it's very clear that he put power ahead of everything else in that decision -- series of decisions he made yesterday. he wanted to retain his power of the senate minority leader, and he wouldn't have been able to do that if he had voted to convict donald trump.
but he also recognizes that republicans -- and governor hogan just said the same thing to you. republicans are not going to be able to win elections if they do not repudiate donald trump. mitch mcconnell knows that, and it's why he said what he said. he repeated it in an interview right after he took this vote. he said i care about electability and that's it. >> you know, claire mccaskill, joe neguse, his entire closing argument was aimed at an audience of one. he clearly had read mitch mcconnell's book, and there's an excerpt about mcconnell's mentor, john sherman cooper. he says, how do you take such a tough stand and square it with the fact that a considerable number of people who elected you have the opposite view. he didn't hesitate a moment. i not only represent kentucky, i represent the nation and there are times you follow and times when you lead. claire mccaskill, you and i were on the air together a couple times yesterday, and you were defending mitch mcconnell here a little bit during the
back-and-forths. where are you on the genuineness of his remarks? >> well, let's be clear one thing that he did do yesterday. he made sure that there is a real war within the republican party because he gave a lock-him-up speech, chuck. he said lock him up. he gave an invitation for criminal prosecution to the nation's prosecutors. and he's the highest ranking republican in the country. >> yep. >> so yesterday was a bad day for donald trump, but it was a worse day for the republican party. so why did he do that? he can't stand donald trump. he thinks donald trump cost him the majority. but, also, he has to worry about donors who write seven-figure checks who are totally put off by donald trump at this point, and, frankly, even if he voted to convict, he knew the majority of his caucus was not going to follow him, and that would
expose a real weak finance terms of his leadership. >> that's interesting there, kasie. does that comport with your reporting, that mcconnell -- that's the debate. would mcconnell have been able to bring over ten votes or not? claire seems to indicate he might not have been able to. >> i think it was a real open question. i think had he made a definitive case and really sold it, it's possible that they could have gotten there, but the reality is that afterward, that group of people was going to be smaller than the group of republicans who were going to vote to acquit donald trump. so there's no scenario where mitch mcconnell can be the minority leader when he sided with the smaller group. so he would have been ceding the power he has. i think he wants to use it to move beyond donald trump. i think senator mccaskill's point is absolutely the right one. we have known all the way along how much mcconnell privately loathed donald trump.
it is not a secret. he was willing to use him, but they are not alike in basically anyway. so i think that this is finally mcconnell's chance to actually say that, but that he did act in his own interest of power. >> audie, big picture, though. did we give a permission slip to our politics to be more violent by not holding anybody accountable for these actions yet? >> i'm not entirely sure who you mean by "we." are you talking about the senate and the republican party? >> yeah, yeah. >> so far essentially the only person who has -- the only people who have sanctioned trump in any way is silicon valley, right? the justice department, of course, is plowing ahead with investigations, opened up some 200 cases of people who were involved in the insurrection. npr's investigation shows a percentage of those people cited trump specifically in their kind of motivations or suggestions about why they were doing what they were doing. this conversation isn't over. but i think -- it sounds like on this panel i'm the person who is a little more pessimistic about
what this means going forward for the republican party. i did not see some opening to the door of a granted revitalization or some change or trump saying goodbye. what i see is a party that is clearly still in his thrall, lawmakers that are still fearful or him, and what that means going forward is quite serious. >> audie, i see the glass as half empty as you do. we'll have more about this conversation when we get all four of you back in a few minutes. but when we directly come back, the cdc releases some new guidelines for how to operate schools during the pandemic. how soon can we take kids from the screens back to the classroom? i'll talk to the new head of the cdc, rochelle walensky next. cdc.
' welcome back. covid vaccinations have ramped up to 2 million a day at the end of last week. and the biden administration is securing 200 more million doses of the pfizer and moderna vaccines. despite that, though, there's still growing frustration over the lack of vaccine supply to meet demand, particularly in this moment. at the same time, parents are desperate to get their kids back in the classroom. cdc issued new guidance for operating schools during the pandemic. joining me now is the new director of the cdc, dr. rochelle walensky. welcome to "meet the press." before i get to the school guidelines, i want to ask about a report out of the uk that indicates this uk variant, not
just potentially more contagious, but potentially more deadly, and this is obviously the variant that officials like yourself fear could be the dominant strain in this country. how concerned are you that we're up against another dark period? >> good morning, chuck. thanks for having me. i think we have to watch this very, very carefully. we've known now that this b117 variant that came from the uk, we have over 1,000 cases here in the united states in over 39 states. we know the early data have demonstrated that it's around 40% to 50% more transmissible. already that means we're likely to have more cases and more deaths from this. now, this early data that have come from a prior set of early data have suggested there might, in fact, be increased morbidity and mortality. all of it is really -- wraps up into we can't let our guard down. we have to continue wearing
masks. we have to continue with our current mitigation measures and we have to continue getting vaccinated as soon as that vaccine is available to us. >> let's talk about the school guidelines. there's some folks that are wondering how much politics may have gotten involved or how much the white house may have gotten involved because last week the white house walked back some comments of yours about teacher vaccinations. you were saying they were not necessary in order to open schools. the white house said you were speaking in your personal capacity. how should we -- are you speaking here as the head of the cdc or in your personal capacity, and should people see a difference? >> i'm speaking as the head of the cdc. i believe that that's why you have me here today. our guidance has now been released. it was released on friday, and it specifically articulates the five key mitigation strategies that we need to keep our schools open, and other layered mitigation strategies including teacher vaccination that are not essential to get our schools open but we do recommend.
>> what are some of the flexibilities in your guidelines? i say this -- you say you want to have six feet. there are some schools that say, look, can we do three feet? everybody will wear masks, can we do three feet, particularly for elementary schools. what would the cdc say? >> you know, our guidance is really dependent on how much disease is in the community. we know that most of the disease that comes into the school comes into the community, and with universal mask wearing, we know that there's very limited transmission within the schools and that that transmission is largely from staff to staff and largely when mask wearing is breached. so we are more flexible with the six feet if there's limited amount of community spread in those low to moderate ranges. when you get to substantial and high ranges of community spread, we really feel like you need six feet. the data suggests, the science suggests you need six feet with universal mask wearing to keep our children and our staffs safe. >> we're getting close to i
think 15 to 20 million americans this week will have gotten their second dose of the vaccine. what is the guidance for a vaccinated -- fully vaccinated american? what is the travel guidance? what is the mask guidance? what is their work guidance? >> really great question. i'm proud to say as of yesterday we hit the 50 million vaccinations into arms mark. so we are scaling up. we don't have a lot of data yet to inform exactly the question that you're asking. we have issued guidance this week that suggests, that wreck mondays, that if you have been vaccinated and you are exposed and you're exposed within three months of your vaccination, that's similar to, if you've been exposed to within three months of disease, that you need not quarantine. as data emerge on many of the questions that you're asking, we will update our guidance in realtime. >> we're seeing a lot of states -- we've just had a dip these last two weeks where it felt like we -- the first week
where we took two stepped forward and one step back, rather than one and two back. a lot of states are getting rid of their mask mandates already. is it too early to be doing that if. >> absolutely. we are still at about 100,000 cases a day. we're still at around 1,500 to 3,500 deaths per day. the cases are more than 2.5-fold times what we saw over the summer. it's encouraging to see these trends coming down, but they're coming down from an extraordinarily high place, and i said earlier, if we want to get our children back to school, and i believe we all do, it all depends on how much community spread is out there. we need to all take responsibility to decrease that spread by taking these precautions including mask wearing so we can get our society back. >> including mask wearing well. i know you gave guidance on that. dr. walensky, we never got the head of the cdc for the last year. it's nice to have the head of
the cdc on "meet the press." thank you very much. >> great to be with you. thank you. >> make sure to check out our interactive state-by-state guide to figure out when and where you can receive your covid vaccine. visit planyourvaccine.com to learn more. when we come back, one very good reason why the senate was so divided on the impeachment vote. stay with us. and the fiery. don't let migraine keep you... ...from saying “i am here.” aim to be there more... ...with aimovig. a preventive treatment... ...for migraine in adults. one dose... ...once a month... ...is proven to reduce monthly migraine days. for some, by half or more. don't take aimovig if you're allergic to it. allergic reactions like rash or swelling can happen hours to days after use. severe constipation can happen. sometimes with serious complications. high blood pressure can happen or worsen with aimovig. common side effects include injection site reactions and constipation. aim to be there more.
welcome back. data download time. the largely partisan impeachment vote on the senate was a function of changes in the senate over recent decades. take a look at how many split party delegations, states with one republican and one democratic, from bill clinton's first term up until this year. you see it. it's quite a dramatic drop. it means most republican senators now come from states won by president trump, giving them very little incentive to politically vote to convict. they don't think they have to win voters across the aisle. at the same time, joe biden won 25 states but only three with split senate delegations. none have two republican senators. going forward, president biden is dealing with a senate with increasingly sharp partisan divisions and little motivation for republican senators to compromise. it's the reverse is true for the democrats as well. when we come back, will donald trump continue to have a big role in the republican party, or could this be the time he finally starts to fade away? stay with us.
e think dealing with copd is a walk in the park. if i have something to help me breathe better, everything will be fun and nice. but i still have bad days flare-ups (coughs), which can permanently damage my lungs. my lungs need protection against flare-ups. so it's time to get real. because in the real world our lungs deserves the real protection of breztri. breztri gives you better breathing symptom improvement, and flare-up protection. it's the first and only copd medicine proven to reduce flare-ups by 52% breztri won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. it is not for asthma. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. don't take breztri more than prescribed. breztri may increase your risk of thrush, pneumonia, and osteoporosis. call your doctor if worsened breathing, chest pain, mouth or tongue swelling, problems urinating, vision changes, or eye pain occur. for real protection ask your doctor about breztri.
(sam) gamers! he who is good for making excuses is seldom good for anything else. take fuzzywuzzy28. blamin' losses on a laggy network. only one or two. verizon 5g ultra wideband is here, the fastest 5g in the world, with ultra... low... lag! stop blaming the network and start becoming the best gamers in the ga-- that escalated quickly. (sam) 5g ultra wideband, now in parts of many cities. this is 5g built right. only from verizon.
welcome back. carlos, i want to build off of what audie said. she's basically -- she didn't see what you and some others on the panel saw. it really is sort of donald trump's future in the party. i guess if he's a stock, would you buy it? and let me introduce you to two facts here. josh mendel, the new front-runner for the ohio senate seat, went full maga in his
announcement to replace rob portman, and the infotainment bullhorns still belong to the trump wing. is this still a bad time to be donald trump? >> chuck, the republican party is still a willing hostage of donald trump today. there's no doubt about that. however, there is a lot of evidence that that power of the trump movement, that influence is waning. we're going to see this play out over the next 18 months, right? mitch mcconnell, a strategic mind, with liz cheney, other establishment republicans against donald trump and his movement. which will win? we'll see. that trump lane is going to be available to a lot of republicans, especially in primaries. how much candidates run in each primary? that's going to be a big impact. this is the battle that will play out over the next 18 months. i think we will have the answer by the time the november 2022 elections are here.
>> kasie, is that the real measuring point we'll find out? are they within his grip or not, 2022, the real measuring stick? >> it's going to be an important turning point, chuck. i also think the big question is what is trump going to do ahead of 2024 because he really could hold some of these would-be presidential candidates who want to inherit his voters hostage to his own intentions. i think the big question is, can former president trump stay focused enough on these goals that he says he has to actually make a real difference and whether any of these republicans like josh mendel can actually credibly carry that banner. and don't forget the point that senator mccaskill made, which is this open invitation to investigate donald trump in the courts, and we sim le don't know how that's going to play out. >> claire, let me flip the script. is donald trump still an effective campaign tool for democrats? >> i think he is. let's for a minute talk about
joe biden. joe biden is enjoying the kind of approval numbers that donald trump only dreamt of. joe biden is pursuing policies that have broad, bipartisan support in the country. forget about congress. in the country. as long as joe biden stays focused on covid relief and infrastructure and some of the things that really resonate with the american people, the democratic party is going to be in great shape in 2022 and 2024. >> you know, i guess, audie, the question is can joe biden govern with this republican party? does he only have 17 republicans to work with, the ten in the house and the seven in the senate? or does he have to try to forge a bigger coalition than that if he even wants to find bipartisanship? >> i think i'm less interested in the seeking of bipartisanship that people talk about and more interested in how he builds any kind of coalition for compromise. he's not a stranger to this process. he's been through it with barack obama and in that white house. so he knows what he's up against. i'm also less interested in what's going on with donald
trump going forward and more interested in what the republicans who say they want to do something different actually do and what that means for the voters they can take along with them because i don't believe that republican voters are hostages. i think they're willing supporters of donald trump. and if there's an alternative, it should present itself. >> well, i think i'll believe that donald trump isn't an influence in the party when you stop having republicans feel like they have to tell one message to the mainstream media and go full maga to the infotainment culture. terrific panel. thank you guys. it's been a long way for kasie, especially. for a lot of us, a long start to the year. i guess now trump might be in the rear view mirror. that's all we have for today. thank you for watching. we'll be back next week. by the way, you've still got time to don't mess up valentines. if it's sunday, it's "meet the press."
the people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president. and having that belief was a foreseeable consequence of the growing crescendo of false statements, conspiracy theories, and reckless hyperbolehyperbole the defeated president could shouting into the largest megaphone on planet earth.