tv BOS Land Use and Transportation Committee SFGTV April 19, 2021 1:30pm-6:01pm PDT
i would like to acknowledge sfgovtv for staffing this meeting. mr. clerk, any announcements? >> thank you. to protect the public and board members and city employees, the board of supervisors legislative chamber and community rooms are closed. members are participating to the same extent as if present in the chamber. public comment is available for each item. sfgovtv.org is displacing the comment call in number across the screen. you have an opportunity to speak during the comment via phone by dialing 415-655-0001. following that enter
id1874819510. then press pound twice to be connected. you will hear the discussions and you will be in listening mode only. when your item calls up dial star 3. the system prompt will indicate you raised your hand. you may begin comments. best practices call from quiet location. speak clearly and slowly. turndown your television or radio or streaming device. account for time delays you may encounter between life coverage and streaming. if you have written comments submit in writing by e-mail to the usual clerk erica major. or you can write to our office in city hall in room 244.
1 carlton b. goodlett place. it is in your agenda. items acted upon today will be in the april 7, 2021 board of supervisors agenda. >> would you please call item 1. >> resolution initiating a landmark designation under article 10 of the planning code for diego rivera's fresco titled the lagory of california painted in 1931 and located at 155 sansome street. >> we also have the planning department on stand by for questions.
>> supervisor preston. >> this is the second time in recent memory i have initiated landmark status of another of the three iconic murals here in san francisco. the one which i am happy to report we initiated is about to be heard by the historic preservation commission and will be coming back for land mark des designation the san francisco art institute and of course there is this one at 155 sam son street on the 11th floor. "the allegory of california." there is a third one in supervisor melgar's district that she is looking to initiate
in what has become known as the diego theater. this one is actually the first of his works. it is in the historic timothy designed stock exchange tower. it is in the historic city club of san francisco. that includes not only this work by diego rivera commissioned by a great american artist in his own right but includes works of english artist harry dixon and other classic works. while it looks huge, if you have been in there and that is a publicly accessible area in the city club, this is a relatively
small mural by rivera's standards. mr. clerk, my staff gave you an image. maybe you can put that up on the screen. i see it now. as you can see from this photo that adorns the staircase inside of the building and like many it wraps on the ceiling, you can see it at the top. at the center is a huge female figure with the spirit of california. the female figure at the center was modeled after the tennis
layer helen moody after whom the playground was named. she was born in the bay area and held the top position in women's tennis for almost a decade. the state of california is supporting its citizens is depicted showing the natural bounty, the fruits and her hands there on the right-hand side of the image. below are men with a blueprint of mathematical tools, lumber yak, model air plant. elderly plan with farming utensils, farm workers and the forefront of if fresco depicts historical figures important to the development and art in the
state of california including the of scaffold and victor barn hoff. he focused on blue-collar workers, which was in line with the socialist, not communist beliefs and was meant to highlight the workers that kept the state afloat and moved it forward. i look forward to your support of this initiation and hopefully in the near future we will have landmarked all three of rivera's treasures for the city and county of san francisco. as i mentioned earlier the one we previously initiated will be
in front of historic preservation commission on may 5th. thank you planning commission staff for their work to develop a report on that one. i am happy to hear from planning department staff. i want to thank my open staff. >> thank you very much for that thorough and fascinating presentation supervisor peskin. mr. carol, let's go to public comment, please. >> thank you, we are joined from the department of technology checking to see if we have callers in the queue. press star 3 to be added to the queue if you wish to speak for this item. if you are on hold please continue to wait until you are prompted to begin. you will hear a prompt informing you your line is unmuted.
for those watching on cable channel 26 or through sfgovtv.org, if you wish to speak call in now by following instructions on the screen. dial 415-655-0001 enter id1874819510. pound twice and star 3 to be entered to speak. could you let us know if we have any callers in the queue? >> there are no callers in the queue. >> thank you. >> seeing that there are no callers, public comment is now closed. motion to move out of committee with positive recommendations. >> so moved. i also had my name in the chat to be added as cosponsor.
>> me as well, please. >> mr. clerk, please call the roll. >> on the motion that this item be recommended offered by vice chair preston. vice chair preston. >> aye. >> peskin. >> aye. >> chair melgar. >> aye. >> madam chair, three ayes. >> the motion passes unanimously. thank you so much. mr. clerk, are there any other items before us today? >> there is no further business. >> thank you so much. we are adjourned. thank you. >> thank you.
123450 you are watching coping with covid-19. today's special guest. >> i am chris matthews. you are watching coaching with covid-19. my guest is the director of the therapy center of san francisco and counselor at the university of san francisco. welcome back to the show. >> thank you. nice to be here. >> it is six months since we last talked. we know a lot more about how the virus works. we are back in the same place. now pandemic fatigue is affecting everybody. could you talk about pandemic fatigue and what it is and provide advice for people so they know how to prepare for the long haul. >> well, pandemic fatigue is a
complex of symptoms. any one you will see most of us are experiencing one of those. physical exhaustion. we feel tired. changes in mood, more worrying leading to increase in anxiety, sense of this is never going to end, hopelessness. it can lead to mild depression, aches, pains, headaches, back pain, decreased motivation, kind of hard to get things done, difficulty concentrating. just can't seem to focus on anything. in the short fuse. we are attending to get more irritable. you can experience one or more of these things. that is generally considered the pandemic fatigue. another level of pandemic
fatigue we are letting our guard down. we are not being as diligent following through on the things we are supposed to be doing. >> it seems like chaos all around this personal lives, across the country, in the local communities. how can we maintain balance when everything feels like it is in disarray. >> good question. we need to get out of denial. this all started in february, march. we thought it was going to be a week or two, maybe a month, maybe a month or two at the most. now it is eight months later. we are in a little worse shape than we were then. things have not improved. the first way to cope is to deal at a more patient level. we need patience. this is not going to end
quickly. even with the vaccine. most offices are not coming back until july. self-control techniques, relaxation or yoga, any of those. breathing exercises. i think combining that with taking good care of ourselves, getting enough sleep, exercising which is critical. it is critical for two reasons. one it keeps you active and makes you feel better. two, for most of us you can get out of the house to do it. the whole notion of social connections has not changed. it is just exacerbated. most of us lost connections to other people in the wayne it used to be. we used to hang out with
friends, go out for beer, go out to lunch, go visit now it is much more constrained. i think that did not eliminate reconnecting with people. i think the social distance visits are a good way to go. visiting people, keeping your distance. no, it is not the same. it is better than no contact at all. video visits, face time, skype, pullout photos if you are alone. online classes are another way to stimulate yourself. online religious services to deal with some of the spiritual issues i think is important. i think you also need to remember you can reach out to mental health workers. most therapy is online now.
there are community programs, private practitioners. i would not rule that out. last, i think is skill. we need to be assertive. people are encroaching on our space. it is difficult for people. i have heard this repeatedly. i was at an outdoor social distance event and people kept trying to come give me a hug. i had trouble saying no. saying no is not easy. practicing learning to say, no, please. keep our distance is helpful. i think another thing to do to cope with this is to stay flexible. particularly, as recommendations from healthcare providers change, which they do. a lot of people criticized this as the reason not to listen to science.
well, first they said that you didn't need a mask. now you need a mask. you could be inside, then outside. this is how science works. science works by accumulation of research. each study changes things slightly. it is not just contact. it is in the air. we do need masks. another is finding a community of friends that reinforces taking care of oneself and being safe. i think that is important. >> i hesitate to talk about the flip side of the pandemic. are there benefits to spend more tame with your family and having a chance for more introspection. >> there are a number of silver linings. one is the family. people are spending more time together. now that can be prob ematic if
you have poor family dynamics. i saw a study that 70% of fathers said they felt closer to their kids because they were home more. not to say that mothers aren't having the same experience. the bonding is different. that is a very positive thing. we have cleaner air and water. you can see the bottom of the canals in venice now. from an aesthetic point of view there are gains. telehealth has exploded both medical kinds of problems and mental health. most therapy is online now. i have not been in my office since march, since the first of march. virtual education is something you can do as a way of coping
with everything. we can bring a lot more learning experiences into our environment that we were not able to do before. that is really taking off. >> finally, can we talk about this upcoming holiday see on how the pandemic will make it more difficult for everybody? how do we avoid feeling guilty if we need to limit the exposure to the virus? >> that is big. the holidays are hugely important time for most of us. it just brings up everything around family. on the one hand that motivates us more to connect. we need to remember the virus is not forgiving. it doesn't care how badly you want to see your family. when you have guilt for not doing things for thanksgiving,
think the flip side is not being guilty for exposing other people in the family to unnecessary health risks. a lot of people justify more social connection with family on the basis of a big holiday. all i can say is the vice president russ doesn't care it is a holiday. >> how are we going to do the holidays? we get more creative. people are talking about virtual meals, when possible. we will all fix a meal at the same time and eat it together online or just some kind of ritual together online. even if it is let's meet for an hour with the family on thanksgiving. i think that is important. another thing if we can't be with family, help people who really can't get out and are as lated.
take a meal to somebody. do you have a friend or neighbor somebody who is alone? it is going to be dramatically different this year. i don't think that means we can't have a nice holiday. i will miss my family reunion. it is what it is. >> assertiveness makes sense. if you are pressured by a family member that says we all get together every home day with all of the kids. if you are not comfortable you need to say no. >> one thing that i would like to say. somebody who teaches assertion all day. it is a critical skill and good coping. it is not easy. i have difficulty sometimes. it is a simple concept that takes work. practicing assertion is helpful.
what you are alone practice. what will you say to people who are too close or come in for a hug. you have to be able to say, i'm sorry, i would love to do that or your own words. >> thank you for coming back on the show. i appreciate the time you have given us today. >> we will be back with more information shortly. you have been watching coping with covid-19. thanks for watching.
>> clerk: president cohen, you have a quorum. also here tonight, we have chief william scott and director paul henderson. >> president cohen: all right. let's go ahead and get started. ladies and gentlemen, please join me by saying the pledge of allegiance. [pledge of allegiance] >> president cohen: thank you. thank you very much. all right. sergeant youngblood, please call the first item. >> clerk: item 1, general public comment. at this time, members of the public are welcome to address the commission regarding items that do not appear on tonight's agenda but that are within the
subject matter jurisdiction of the commission. speakers shall address their remarks to the commission as a whole and not to individual commissioners. members of the public may call in 415-655-000 is and enter meeting i.d. 187-188-8899, then press pound and pound again. press star, three to be entered into the queue and wait until until -- until you are prompted to speak. all right, commissioner, we have a number of callers. good evening, caller. you have two minutes.
>> commissioners, my name is francisco dacosta, and in district 10, there's utter pandemonium. today, i addressed an e-mail to the chief of police. for the last two years, on ingall between [inaudible] and jennings, gambling, loud music, and disregard for human citizens. and those who should protect us, fast asleep in the cockpit. wake up. stop the machinations at the
police commission. i see the questioning on this, that, and the other, and address quality of life issues. we pay our taxes. our seniors are suffering, women, single parents are suffering, children are suffering, business people are suffering while paying their taxes. they cannot enter their offices. miscreants are behaving like -- i will not use the word. i am talking to you now, but in the future, i will stop talking, and i will write about your ethics. thank you very much. >> clerk: good evening, caller.
you have two minutes. >> hi. my name is kate hodge. i'm a core member of wealth and disparities in the black community founded by the wonderful [inaudible] jones. i'm calling to follow up on the comment that chief scott made in the last meeting where he's in the process of holding community meetings about the trial of derek chauvin and the murder of george floyd, and we're wondering when those community meetings will be happening, what the deal is with that because it's a big claim that we haven't seen substantiated in terms of action, so we'd like to hear more details on that asap. thank you. >> clerk: good evening, caller. you have two minutes. >> good evening, chief scott, president cohen, and
commissioners. [inaudible] issues can be handled by unarmed traffic enforcement where safety requires it. across the country, traffic stops have a disproportionate effect on communities of color, and as sfpd and the center for policing equity showed, san francisco is no exception. stopping black and brown drivers 2.5 times as much as white drivers. when new zealand put traffic stops in the nonpolice agency, surveys showed the residents
had greater respect towards the police. the commission can lead on an issue that would be a major sea change in policing. thank you. >> clerk: good evening, caller. you have two minutes. >> good evening, police commissioners, my name is yolanda scott, and i'm the president of the citizens for justice. after witnessing the death of george floyd and -- we see that our training process must continuously revised based upon our police interactions with
civilians. we must reevaluate our usage of physical controls, especially by support officers on the scene. we must continue to develop the reflex and constraint and control and the immediacy of the moment and ensure our best choice is our first choice, ensuring public safety from society as well as officers. those who are called to protect and serve do not -- we have to make sure that those who are called to protect and serve do not create further harm to the community. let's continue to encourage our officers to slow down, focus on less lethal options and focusing on options to deescalate a situation provide resources. training must continue to ensure our officers are not engaging in socio logical
training of continuous fire and excessive force. let's continue to review and evaluate existing policies and procedures. this is an excellent opportunity for us to learn from the mistakes of others and to enhance our future relationships with our civilians and our stakeholders. i thank you very much for your time. >> clerk: good evening, miss brown. you have two minutes. >> can you hear me? >> clerk: yes. >> oh, okay. good evening. i was just here to talk about my son that was murdered august 14, 2006. still, his case isn't solved. his birthday was just april 6, april 6, last week, and i didn't get to get on here because i was busy criming on
my car, putting on the poles, where people still snatching down the signs with my son's picture of the $250,000 reward. it makes me so upset that during this time that young men and people are dieing, and people just don't care. i've been asking for a venue for the last 15 years, you know, concerning my son and other mothers and fathers where i have to come up on a pole and put a balloon and another balloon, saying it's a boy, and flowers and stuff, that i'm still having to do, you know, and with the case still being unsolved as a cold case, what do we do? we need a place, a venue for our children's pictures to stay up so that i won't have to climb up on a pole. i'm too old to be climbing on top of a car to keep my son's
picture up. this little african american boy's face on a pole, they're snatching them down. i pretty much know who is doing it. it's people where i live, and they don't want to see his face up there. i'm sad that i have to keep fighting with neighbors and stuff like that. some of them say it's okay, but i know deep down inside, they don't want it up, and i hate -- i got involved with the traffic crosser named doug because he snatched it down, and bare land almost fired him over that, and i know he did it again today. >> clerk: thank you, miss brown. for members of the public that have information of the murder of aubrey abicassa, please call
the tip line at 554-4444. thank you. hello, caller, you have two minutes. >> you know, person talking about the issues going on, we have murders still going on. these involve black and brown individuals. i myself as a brown individual understand there's inequities. you stand on the corner at third and oakdale, you're going to see people driving at high speeds and recklessly. our lives are at risk because p.d., there's equity concerns and other concerns that are priorities while we watch more
men than women get assaulted and die out here, so please, get some enforcement out here. >> clerk: thank you, caller. and president cohen, that is the end of public comment. >> president cohen: thank you very much. thank you to the callers for calling in, particularly about concerns about the bayview, concerns that i share and at least two thirds of members of this body that live in bayview share, as well. all right. sergeant, next on the agenda is the consent calendar, is that right? >> clerk: yes. >> president cohen: would you please call it? >> clerk: item 2, consent calendar, receive and file, action. family code section 6228 incident report release quarterly report. >> president cohen: all right.
so this is a report on section 6228. 93 were requested filed pursuant to the family code, and then all the other requests were filled within five days, and 91 requests were made in english, two were made in spanish. my recommendation is we receive and file the report. i want to open it up for public comment and also open it up for comment from my colleagues, see if there's any thoughts. let me get my chat function open. all right. colleagues, seeing that there is no comment on this, let's take public comment on this, mr. youngblood. >> clerk: members of the public that would like to make public comment on-line item 2, consent calendar, please press star, three now. >> president cohen: okay.
sounds like there isn't. >> clerk: none. >> president cohen: perfect. okay. may i have a motion to receive and file? >> commissioner brookter: so moved. >> president cohen: thank you. i have a motion by commissioner brookter and second by commissioner elias. may i have a roll vote on-line item 2. >> clerk: on the motion to receive and file the family code section 6228 incident report -- [roll call] >> clerk: you have six yeses. >> president cohen: all right. that sounds unanimous. let's go with the next item, item 3. >> clerk: line item 3, reports to the commission, discussion.
chief's report. weekly crime trends. provide an overview of offenses occurring in san francisco. major, significant incidents. provide a summary of planned activities and events. this will include a brief overview of any unplanned events or activities occurring in san francisco having an impact on public safety. commission discussion on unplanned events and activities the chief describes will be limited to determining whether to calendar for a future meeting. >> president cohen: thank you. chief scott, are you there? >> yes. tonight, i'll start with current trends and give some updates on what's going on around the country that may impact the city of san francisco. so with crime trends, the good news on our crime trend side is
we are finally negative for the year. we have one less homicide than we were in the last year. we are where we are in 2019 with about a 50-year low in homicides, so we hope we can keep this trend going. the bad news is we are up on gun related homicides and gun-related violence across the board, although we are starting to see a slight reduction on that, we still have a lot to do on gun-related violence, and i'll get to that in a second. we're up slightly up in human trafficking. we had seven this year as opposed to six last time this year. property crime, the good news is that although we are significantly still up in burglaries, we are seeing a downed trend. this week over last, there was a 26% decrease in burglaries, and we're now down to a 40%
decrease, which is still alarmingly high, but it's better than it was a month ago, much better than it was a month ago, when we were up in the 50% rate. motor vehicle thefts are up. we're seeing a 14% increase. arson, we're still up with 14 -- actually, 24 crimes above where we were this time last year, and overall larcenies are down significantly, including car burglaries. larcenies down 37%, which is a drop of over 3400 crimes, and auto burglaries, we are down 31%. as the economy reopens and more people start back to visit our city, we expect more people to be out and about, and we are employing strategies of high visibility. we have our plain clothes units
apprehending and creating community visibility. in terms of shootings, the bayview is the highest in terms of shooting, with 18, and that's double last year. we still have our enhanced deployment in the bayview. we have our foot beats in the bayview. they're not 24-7, but they're still deployed along with the command vehicle in the bayview. in addition, commander marron is doing a lot of community engagement as we work on solving cases, and we just solved another homicide from the bayview just yesterday. unfortunately, when thee crimes occur, we will do our best to solve them to bring closure and
relief to the families. we have moved and shifts the hours of some of our plainclothes units that are addressing burglaries by surgicaling neighborhoods and hotspots, and we have made some arrests of burglaries in progress, so there's some success there. some of the arrests that we have made involve numerous raps, and we will continue to work with the district attorney's office on those repeat offenders. i want to go back to the shootings just for a second. [inaudible] 12 this year. northern, they're four this one, one this time last year. ingleside has six. taraval has two this year and
zero last year. tenderloin, southern, richmond are even, and central had one last year and one this year, so we'll continue to work on that. in terms of other significant incidents, we have fatal traffic collisions at 18 and church in the mission district. our deceased was 85 years old. we believe this traffic collision was the result of a medical emergency that occurred with the deceased individual who was driving, struck a delivery truck. when people tried to render aid, they noticed that he had foam coming from his mouth and appeared to be in medical distressed. he was transported and later pronounced, so we do believe that was a medical emergency that was the cause of that particular tragic collision. other significant incidents, we had a robbery of a [inaudible] back in the stowe lake area in
the richmond area. [inaudible] they saw a suspicious vehicle driving around the area and parking. when they walked back to the news van, the vehicle pulled next to them. one suspect exited, pepper sprayed the victim, and took the camera. there was an armed security guard that was with this news crew, so he actually pointed his handgun, intervened. the subject ended up dropping the camera, jumped into the vehicle, and fled. we did -- the camera was recovered, rather, and they did get images of the suspect, which we are following up on those leads. the vehicle was located, and we believe the suspects are part of a crew that has committed prior robberies in and around the stowe lake area, so we will definitely put our resources
into that. a stabbing occurred in the bayview at the exeter. victim was a 53-year-old asian male who was walking home after getting off of work. the suspect followed him, attempted to rob him of his property, which was a cell phone, and in the process, stabbed him multiple times. there is a video of the incident as well as other forensic evidence were recovered, so we are vigorously investigating that, and are trying to make a suspect identification and arrest so that person can also be held accountable. we also have graffiti and hate crime incidents in japantown. there was a series of vandalisms where graffiti was sprayed on businesses in
japantown community benefits district. it included racially derogatory remarks such as the term f.o.b., which stands for fresh off the boat, which is asian derogatory. we did get evidence of the suspects on video camera that was given to the police department for follow up, and we will be following up, and hopefully, we can make an arrest in that case. we will vigorously investigate this crime or series of crimes. our investigation division is in charge of that incident, and we'll keep you all posted if there's an arrest there. last thing i would like to report is there were several student driving events, a.k.a. side shows in the city. our recently created stunt
driving response level was assembled when we learned earlier in the day that these things were occurring in other cities in the east bay, and those departments communicated with us, so we were ready when they came across the bridge, and we broke up three events. we did get evidence, we did make citations, and we do hope with the evidence that we obtained, we'll be doing follow-up and impounding cars from that evidence. the unit is doing well, and our response to this is much more efficient, quicker, and much better coordinated since we've put that unit together, so i'd really like to congratulate or give thanks to that -- the leader of that unit, which is lieutenant homer, and hopefully we can continue to make progress in that area. there were no homicides this week and no shootings this week that resulted in injuries. i'm happy to report that, and i will give an update on our
progress on what's going on with what's happening in minnesota and the chauvin trial, and then, we had another incident in minnesota with the shooting of the african american male over the weekend, so that's caused a lot of unrest across the country, protests. we will have a community meeting tomorrow, and the invites have gone out. we are reaching out to leaders in the african american culture, the african american clergy, aapi leaders as well as people we believe have influence in the community, so we'll be working together with the respective communities that may be impacted by this, and with that conversation, we hope and plan that it'll be on going as we go through this ordeal that we're going through.
as far as the trial itself, the defense is on -- we're hearing that it's moving quicker than anticipated, so we don't know if the case will be wrapped up this weekend or not. but we will be deployed to the fullest and be prepared for whatever comes our way. so far, there have not been any incidents in the city, and we are working with our city leaders to make sure we're prepared as possible on that, and that concludes my report. >> president cohen: thank you. colleagues, do you have any questions for the chief? >> commissioner brookter: i do, madam chair.
>> president cohen: okay. go ahead, commissioner brookter. >> commissioner brookter: thank you, chief, and i'm glad to hear that the police department is reaching out to the african american community. i think it goes back being to having those black lives matter posters put in each department to ensure that it wasn't just a symbol, to be sure we were going to have conversations as things arise, not just here in the city but in the country, so i'm glad to hear that we are taking those steps. my question, chief, was just -- you know, we always like to talk strategy, so i just always like to know, but i'd like to ask, what's the strategy now that things are opening up? we also know we were unable to have an academy class or two, you know, during covid, so kwhas akind of the department's response to things beginning to
open back up? we've got -- gun violence is up, so what's kind of our overall san francisco police department strategy in response to having more folks, you know, out and about and ensuring the public safety? >> thank you, commissioner, for that, and really, it goes back to what we've talked about over the last couple of months. we had to be out, we had to be engaged, so there was more demand for more foot beats in the city, especially in areas impacted by gun violence. we need to sustain that. in terms of the other piece of the strategy, i think we'll have another academy class at the end of may. we're trying to wrap that up. we did get approval at d.h.r. and the mayor's office to add some testing components around
bias and try to root out bias with our entry level applicant pool, and we have gotten permission for that, so we have opened back up that process. we hope to have our class ready to go in six months or actually a little bit more than six months, but it'll lead to a situation where we're bringing officers into the department. as you know, the situation the last four or five years has been greater than it's ever been in the department. that definitely helps with our objectives overall, the objectives over the long run, but we need to bring fresh officers in. i think the recruiting got harder with what we saw with mr. wright in minnesota and the
army lieutenant. we have to keep doing what we're doing in terms of community policing, c.r.i., treating people with dignity and respect. those basic things have to be -- you have to walk the talk, and that goes a long way. our clearance rate in homicides, we can relate to people, we tend to get better cooperation, so those basic things have to be drilled in and as part of our d.n.a., but we've got to have the personnel power, too, so we've got to get those academy classes going. in the meanwhile, we're going to do whatever we can to move around the pieces that we need to just to make sure we have adequate deployment. >> commissioner brookter: thanks, chief. >> thank you. >> president cohen: chief, one of the things that, several weeks ago, when we had the bayview strategy presentation, we had talked about taking it a step further and stated -- i stated that i was considering a community forum that we could
possibly agendize into the future, and i wanted to get your take on that, if this is something that we can begin to do to begin to call attention -- there's been rallies, there's been lots of calls for dropping the violence. i'm looking for thoughtful ways to really take the next level a step further. the data says one thing, but how do we begin to implement the strategy? my other part of this question is with a new captain in place, i imagine new strategies are already in place. could you have your staff double-check when the bayview captain meetings are so that i can report it back into this venue so that people can send out the tweets and people can send out the notifications for those that are listening and get in tune and begin to
develop a rapport with the bayview captain? >> yes, president cohen, and i believe that is the way to go with community forums. the police department has worked to impact the challenges, violence policing. i think the way people expect us to police, that has to be a partnership, so the forums are very valuable in my opinion, particularly when they're thoughtful, and we have set agendas where we're trying to accomplish forward and move our police department agendas forward, and we need to be a part of that, so definitely, i will get that scheduled. if we haven't already -- i think we promised that last time, so i'll check to see if we have it. >> president cohen: i don't know if i have it. if i have, i just overlooked it
in my inbox. just a note to the people that are listening, send me a tweet or an e-mail, and send me ideas of strategies that we can begin to implement working with our community leaders, working with our nonprofits to ensure that we are taking this thoughtful approach. i'm open to the new ideas. commissioners, do you have anything else for the chief? you said in your report that some of the crime trends were decreasing, but you didn't cake to me why or your thoughts around them. add some context to these decreases, please. thank you. >> well, no, so with the burglaries, one of the things that i mentioned -- i'll add some detail to that. i think we have made some impactful arrests, but when i say impactful, we do have a
running kind of a list of people who have been arrested for burglaries, and we believe, just based on our investigations, they're still active, and some of those folks have been apprehended and arrested, and we are working, and we have worked with our district attorney and his team to make sure that we are all communicating the same information about those people who we believe will be active, and what we've been able to accomplish with that with the help from our district attorney partnership is some of those people remain in custody after the arrest. with covid and all that, there was a lot of released, and we arrested people multiple times. we all believe that people deserve a second chance at some point, but we also believe that we've got to figure out a way to slow that down. working with the district attorney, we've made some high impact arrests. we also have shifted our resources to areas that have
been getting plagued with burglaries and garage burglaries. we're having people come in overnight when a lot of these burglaries have been happening, prevent some in my opinion, and that word gets out real quickly, so that's been an effective strategy, as well. and then, the work that we've been doing, upgrading locks on garage doors and stuff like that and things in the community -- and inspections. if the people are interested, we can do s.f. safe. they can call the department, so all those things add up, and we are doing those things, and i hope that's the reason for some of the things that we're doing, and we'll change them to
address some of the trends that they've been doing, but they have been going down, so that's a good thing. >> president cohen: all right. just wanted to appreciate the good work and the commitment. and two, i wanted to recognize that so we understand it and duplicate it. let's not take our foot off the gases. let's continue what we're doing so we can continue to see downward trends and see a baseline of zero. okay. we're going to move forward. i don't see any other names -- >> commissioner hamasaki: commissioner -- >> president cohen: oh, commissioner hamasaki, i didn't see your name out there. >> commissioner hamasaki: i've had my hand up for quite a while. michael connolly, one of the highest ranking members of the
san mateo police department who is currently under investigation by the district attorney's office as well as two former troubled former sfpd officers as well for their conduct in broadmoor, and, you know, my issue has always been, one of the issues that i always thought that we need to pay for focus on is the culture of the department, and, to me, reading that article just we emphasized some of the things that we've heard about the bad old days of sfpd. we just had a high member retire last year, supervising this department, just hearing
possibly engaging in thuggish behavior to other officers. chief, were you aware of this article? >> no, i have not seen this article, commissioner hamasaki. there was an article a couple of months ago with some of what you just said in it, and i don't remember what publication, but i have not seen any recent articles, no. >> commissioner hamasaki: well, then, i don't think my questions of you would be very productive. but what i'll do, i'll send you the article chief, and i just want to understand, you know, when we're seeing these examples come up from the department, you know, what we're doing to address the impact these individuals have had on the culture, what measures are we putting in place to make sure others who happen to share similar viewpoints about what policing looks like in san francisco, that we're addressing that in a
way -- you know, when you talk about recruiting and policing problems, like the daunte wright shooting and derek chauvin trial, we need to make sure our house is in order. i'll send it to you. >> great. we can talk about it offline. >> commissioner hamasaki: thanks. >> president cohen: all right. let's continue moving forward with the next jaent item. -- agenda item. >> clerk: item 3-b, d.p.a. director's report. report on recent d.p.a. activities and announcements. d.p.a.s report will be limited
to a brief description of d.p.a. activities and announcements. commission discussion will be limited to determining whether to calendar any of the issues raised for a future commission meeting. >> okay. can you see me? >> commissioner hamasaki: we can see you. >> in the statistics, we are at 222 cases that have been opened so far. this time last year, we are at 233. this year so far, we had closed 286. this time last year, we closed 273. we currently have 301 cases that were pending. last year this time, we had 391. we had sustained 17 cases so far this year. this time last year, we were at 11. for cases that are past the 270-day investigation mark, we are at 35. this time last year, we were at 41. again, our numbers are going
down. again, i'm not going to do this every week, but again, i went through every single one of the daises to see what the delays are just to make sure i'm keeping a more thorough watch on everything. several of the cases were pending criminal and/or civil investigations, tools that are involved, on going officer involved shooting cases, they're still being worked up. two of them were delayed, several are body-worn camera footage, and others are where officers are either out on disability and receiving disability pay or on vacation or awaiting scheduling for interviews, so again, i will continue to watch those numbers, but i wanted to, over the next few weeks, give you some of the details that have come up in the past so you guys know that i'm watching them.
since we've taken over the agency, we have had no cases get to the 3304 mark, and i will remain vigilant about losing jurisdiction with relation to my office. at this point in time, we have mediated seven cases this year. last time this year, we had mediated nine cases. we've continued a number of outreach events. again, with the coronavirus and the pandemic, most of our outreach efforts are virtual. a list of our community outreach events can be found on the community calendar on our website. on the 8th, we hosted a session for our department and how it works. on the same day, we also participated in the megablack
meeting, coordinating various topics related to african americans in san francisco. i think this will not also included a whole section with board of supervisors member shamann walton, our board president, talking about d.p.a. on the 9th, we hosted a panel of outreach strategies in partnership with the oakland community police review agency and san diego county's citizens law enforcement review board. we want to make sure that we are connected to the other civilian oversight agencies, and we borrow and share ideas on outreach and staying connected, specifically with disenfranchised communities and communities of color.
on the 12th, we had a workshop for interns of color to work with d.p.a., and we brought back all of our interns and law clerks to participate in that, as well. there are three cases that are in closed session on this evening. present on the call to follow up on my issues that may come up with d.p.a. is senior investigator steve ball. again, the website to contact d.p.a., and people can contact our office through the website or contact us directly at 415-241-7711, and the website is sfgov.org/dpa. the other thing that i just wanted to mention and bring up, because we were talking about it earlier, president cohen, was that we have an on going
project identifying race disparities in various groups and in combination with the directions from commissioner elias in collecting some of the recommendations from community members. in those recommendations, people will now be able to make those recommendations on our website, as well, and then, i will appropriate all of those and make presentations to this commission, as well. obviously, this will follow when we have our broader presentation when this gets put on the agenda, but that will address some of the race disparities and give more folks some of the folks an idea to address potential concerns and potential solutions, as well. i think that's it. there are a number of things that i will have input and
comments on in the agenda, but that concludes my report, and sorry, i know i'm still talking funny. >> president cohen: that's okay. it's much improved have last week. we wish you speedy healing, director henderson. okay. colleagues, do we have any questions for the director? i don't see anything in the chat. all right. thank you, director. we're going to continue to move forward. >> commissioner hamasaki: sorry. >> president cohen: yes, commissioner hamasaki, please, go ahead. >> commissioner hamasaki: sorry. i didn't put my hand up. director henderson, i wanted to raise with you, since it does seem to be on a lot of people's minds this week with the killing of daunte wright, and i understand that your office is working on a policy.
i was wondering if you could give a brief overview because i've been working with your office several years on some of these issues, and right now, i think just kind of looking at what's going on in the world, it might be a good time to light a fire on getting that out. >> so thank you for raising that issue, and i will address it, and i'll address it in the context of what we're seeing with daunte wright now because it makes it easier to have broader understanding and, i guess, vision of what we're seeing right now.
>> -- used to stop him specifically as, again, another unarmed young black man is part of the problem, especially when that engagement escalated into the lethal use of force, which, as you know, they use five times the national average when it's a black man, so that's the backdrop of it. but locally, we're trying to look at some of the pretextual
areas in those stops. by logical extension, it also expands into stops, searches, and seizures, as well, so you can't really fix one corner of anything without addressing some of the larger policies, and that's what makes it somewhat complicated but all the more necessary because it just shifts, so if you fix one part of it, it just shines the light on the part that has another problem, as well. for most people that don't understand how to frame the problem, you can always begin the conversation by looking at the race disparities. the data will tell you that you want to have evidence-based
solutions, and it will tell you where disparities are. i know that's a long answer to what you're asking. >> commissioner hamasaki: yeah, and i think commission vice president elias can certainly remind us all of the data, but it's been an on going problem for this department, for departments everywhere. we're not unique here, but i do want to talk more about this in commission reports, but i did want people to understand that this is something that your office has been working on and that you're going to have some solutions to offer soon. >> in the next few weeks, if not months. >> commissioner hamasaki: weeks are better. >> yes. we're ready, but like i said, i'm trying to expand some of the voices and role so that other people can work on the
problem. a lot of recommendations have been made in a lot of the audits that have come before, especially in the sparks report, but having new eyes and new voices on this commission in particular i think might be outcome determinant and make a real difference literally right now. >> commissioner hamasaki: great. thank you very much, director henderson. >> president cohen: thank you, director hamasaki. i appreciate that line of questioning. it was very thoughtful, very vivid. okay. let's move forward with the youth commission report. >> clerk: line item 3-c, youth commission report, and i believe that commissioner rome jones is here. >> i am. hello. >> president cohen: hi, rome. thank you for joining us. >> i'm just pulling up the notes. there's a lot to say. okay.
well, what has the youth commission done since -- i think we presented last month, but it wasn't me because i was, like, taking time off. so the youth commission has done a consent calendar and wrote letters of support for a.c.a. 1, a.b. 503, a.b. 655, a.b. 937, a.b. 4, s.b. 56, a.b. 829, s.b. 646, s.b. 49 the 3, s.b. 793, a.b. 1140, and a.b. 6 of 00. see, i'm glad i didn't have to remember all of that. i'm glad i wrote it down, and the reason we did that is, like, some of those key things in all of these are, like, aligned with values of primarily the transformative justice committee and the
alternatives to prison industry. okay. and that's a bunch of extra information. i could explain all of those other bills, but i'm not going to do that. other things to report. we also toured the normal hotel, which is adult probation's t.a.y. housing site, and one of our main concerns was that there's only one t.a.y. housing site for adult probation, and that there's, like, a fear that it might close. other than that, y.c. applications are going to open next month, have some info sessions this month, so any of you are with youth connections, encourage them to apply. i think, last month, a different commissioner pointed out the partnership with
d.p.h., so we wanted to remind you all that we are partnering with them, and then lastly, we are going to have a presentation from cart, the community alternative to homelessness -- cahr, the community alternative to homelessness response. other than that, hello to everyone we haven't seen in a while. >> president cohen: all right. commissioner jones, thank you so much for the presentation. i wanted to see your response to the shootings that happened in the bayview? have you come up with some strategies that we should be paying attention to, any suggestions? >> directly on shootings in the bayview, no, we have not. i think in general, our stance
is that the city focused on the response to thing and not the prevention, but next time i report to you, i can definitely better answer that question, because now, i will go back to the transformative justice committee and be, like, hey, how do we think we should directly address these things? >> president cohen: yeah. so moving forward, you know, the brief summary of what you're covering in the commission is very helpful. i think you guys, the youth commission, is uniquely qualified to give us input from the youth perspective, thinking about side shows, thinking about gun violence, thinking that you're hearing of what we're concerned about. youth commission is uniquely squarely focused, almost a peer
to peer, and you are able to tell us what you're see and go what you're hearing. now -- seeing and what you're hearing. now, i'm not talking about snitching. i'll pose the question that i posed to the chief. how do we get attention to these rallies? we talk to the same people, and we say the same things, and then, we go home, and there's a shooting or a homicide, and i want to spend our collective energy in a productive way. i want to hear some solutions. i want to hear something out of the box that we haven't considered, and so i'm looking to the youth commissioners to provide that level of insight so that we can begin to use the needle and address things. it's the youth that's going to a side show. i'm not going to a side show, hamasaki is not going to a side show. the chief is not going to a side show. what is so interesting about a side show that we can begin to
address? nobody is talking about it from a different lens, so that is my charge to you as a commissioner, to go back ask to think about this -- go back and think about this critically. maybe you need to go to some side show and figure out some information -- be careful. i don't want you to get arrested, but my point is that's the kind of level, right? we need to be 360, we need to be in people's shoes. we need to be thinking about how we can provide, like you said, a response to the symptoms and not the cause, not the end result. so there -- there you go, mr. jones. you don't have to respond. i'm not looking for a response, but i'm just placing that
response at your feet. there's a lot of things going on here, and i think the youth commission has a different -- plays a different position than we as police commissioners do. one position is not greater or better than the other, but just like on a basketball team, a football team, you've got offense and defense. both teams need to play their positions in order to win the game. so. >> commissioner hamasaki: president cohen? >> president cohen: yes. >> commissioner hamasaki: thank you for the presentation. i think it provides some great insight that some of us don't see from our perspectives in
life. commissioner cohen raised some problems that we're having in the community. i'm wondering if -- and, you know, i've certainly heard that the youth commission, they did a presentation about antiasian violence, and, you know, i think we really all appreciated that, and that's another issue that we're trying to figure out, and issues that arise coming out of that, and so i would add that i would like to continue to hear more from the youth commission. >> president cohen: thank you. commissioner hamasaki.
does anyone have any thoughts or comments? >> commissioner brookter: if i may. >> president cohen: go ahead, commissioner brookter. >> commissioner brookter: just piggybacking on what was said by commissioner jones, thinking about so many of the things that we're facing and what's going on. we know we're having side shows. what are some alternatives that the youth commission can work on alongside the police commission to keep folks from those, like basketball workshops and things. and also, rome, i wanted to clarify for members of the public, we use a lot of acronyms. so for folks that don't know, t.a.y. is transitional age youth, and it's youth between the ages of 18 and 25. there's opportunity for us to be more proactive, but yeah,
thank you for the concise presentation, and thank you for that this evening, and looking forward to more in the future. >> president cohen: appreciate the comment. any other questions for commissioner jones? >> commissioner yee: i have one. >> president cohen: oh, commissioner yee? >> commissioner yee: [inaudible] i guess i'm looking at economic justice and seeing whether the needs for outreach for employment in your community and throughout the whole city where labor can play a part for you, putting a pathway for those youth and young adults, you know, that do run into trouble and see if
labor maybe can help in that sense in putting financial opportunities in front of you, and whether you have approached some of the labors in the city, so that -- that would be my question to you on the labor side. >> president cohen: all right. thank you. anyone else? okay. perfect. let's keep moving forward. sergeant youngblood, please call the next item. >> clerk: commission reports. commission reports will be limited to a brief description of activities and announcements. commission discussion will be limited to determining whether to calendar any of the issues raised for a future commission meeting. commission president's report, commissioners' reports, and commissioner announcements and scheduling of items identified for consideration at a future commission meeting, action. >> president cohen: all right. colleagues, we'll start with -- we'll start with the vice president today. commission elias, i know you've
got a lot of slots. you've been kind of quiet today, but tell us what's percolating in that mind of yours. >> vice president elias: well, i'm actually excited about the 96-a presentation that's coming forward. my understanding is the way that it's going to be presented and the way that we're going to look at it is going to be from a different lens in terms of solutions and ideas. i want to thank director henderson for all of his hard work and effort in really changing the way that we view this. i know that people are probably tired of me talking about these numbers, so i really want to change the conversation to how do we talk about this and be more solution oriented? so i can't wait to hear from the community, can't wait to hear from director henderson about all of his efforts as well as my fellow colleagues at the department, so i'm really
excited about that. >> president cohen: any other colleagues would like to comment on an update? commissioner hamasaki, perhaps you can talk a little bit about the gang task force? >> commissioner hamasaki: i'm not ready on that. i will have my notes over. stacey's e-mailed me, bill's e-mailed me. i've got to call. i'm working on them, president cohen. i did want to add, on another subject, if it would be appropriate -- thank you. so on the -- i think that traffic stops, pedestrian stops, searches and seizures, these really have to be a priority for this commission. we've been talking about it for years. we've talked about the data. the data has -- you know
there's been good reports and less good reports, but generally, the problems remain that we have disparate reports for policing in the city, people who are walking down the streets, who are searched. arising out of these encounters is a negative perception that extends to law enforcement as a whole. if you're walking to the store, and it's the third time you've been stopped walking to the store this year, you're going to stop feeling positive towards the law enforcement in your community. if you're always getting pulled over, you know, for a broken taillight, something that might
be economic related, these low level issues where there's not a source of danger or violence that don't require an immediate police presence, you know, we need to find a way to stop these. i know that we talk, and we've been talking, and i'm working with some folks on transitioning traffic enforcements to nonarmed nonpolice, and i know this is a long-term project. but in the short-term, there's some easy, relatively easy itemed that we can tackle. we can tackle whether or not police need to be making these low level stops that director henderson was referring to. jaywalking, riding a bicycle on the sidewalk. you know, there could be just a warning. it doesn't need to be a detention, and you certainly don't need to get searched,
right? because that's what happens every time, and i understand from the law enforcement perspective, they might think that this person looks like they're a bad guy, and maybe if they stop them and search them, they'll find something. and, you know, maybe they'll get it right sometimes. there's data that if you do x number of searches, you may find something, right? so you search 20 people, and you find some fentanyl. great. but what about those other 19 people that didn't have anything, you know? what are they left with? what are they walking around the streets with, and what is their impression about law enforcement as a result of that? so i think this is going to be a priority for this commission, d.p.a., the department. i'd like us all to work together to identify priorities around traffic stops, pedestrian stops, and searches that we can adopt in short
order. these don't have to be long, drawn-out complete revisions of policies, but there are easy items. stopping consent searches. there's no such thing as a consent search, but if you're a 17-year-old black kid, driving, go to bayview, and you have six cars behind you, and there's officers with guns, we know what happens. there's no consent. so there's some easy things we can do i'd like to do collaboratively with everybody, but this, commission president cohen, has been on top of us to lineup some priorities for each of us commissioners, and i think this has to be one of them, and this is something that i'd like to work on moving forward. >> president cohen: well said. i'd love for you to roll up your sleeves and work on it.
that's a good idea. very good suggestion. commissioner brookter, are you interested in making a presentation tonight? >> commissioner brookter: i am. just in terms of -- and i'll be very brief. i'm just looking forward to our discussion that we're going to have here, actually this evening, around department general or the 3.0 # the. so for members of the public, that's the deputy awards, and i also want to make sure i've thanked commissioner -- 3.09. so for members of the public, that's the deputy awards, and i also want to make sure i've thanked commissioner dejesus and stacey for working with us on these awards. as chief scott was talking about trying to get more folks onto the force and into the academy, and as we look at the culture of the department, i think being able to acknowledge officers who are actually doing
did he nominal work with these awards, it just -- it breaths into the culture of the department. i think within any job or any city agency to highlight when individuals are doing well is a boost of morale for a job that's extremely tough that gets tougher when what transpired in minneapolis happens across the nation. so i'm looking forward to that discussion. i hope it's not a long discuss discussion that we have on 3.09, but just thank you to petra, stacey, and everyone so we can have this discussion and honor some of the men and women that are on our force and doing phenomenal work here in the city and county of san francisco. >> president cohen: thank you, commissioner, for bringing that up. it's important to have a balanced perspective. sometimes we can get bogged
down in the work, but it's important we do keep morale up, and it's important we acknowledge outstanding members of the department, and there are many of them. so i'm glad that sergeant kilshaw's efforts to begin to look at awarding valor moving forward. also wanted to recognize tippy mazzucco who was instrumental in developing this. commissioner yee, do you have anything you want to report? >> commissioner yee: for this commission meeting, you have a cutie there right in front of you. i just want to say wow, she is cute. at this time, i have nothing to report, but get ready for next
month -- or next week. >> president cohen: that's awesome. we will be ready. i think i've gotten all the commissioners. i just want to report that -- you've heard me say this earlier in the meeting, after the bayview strategy presentation, been looking for ways to engage this commission to take a step further and consider community forum as a possible way to continue to build a rapport, information, and finding ways to find solutions. so also wanted to look at ways to streamline some of our processes and how d.g.o.s get addressed, selected, which ones we're going to work on and then how the process is going to
unfold. and i think that's primarily it. and sergeant youngblood, we can continue with the next item. thank you. >> clerk: so the next item would be public comment. at this time, the public is now welcome to make public comment regarding line item 3, reports to the commission. at this time, if you would like to make public comment, press star, three now. good evening, caller. you have two minutes. >> again, my name is francisco da costa, and i think if you're educated on issues, and you have your heart in the right place, that there's not going to be rambling and rambling and rambling. so i would like you all, the commissioners, to find out how many, what segment of the
population are incarcerated in our jails and what portion of our population are released from incarceration facilities. i also would like you to find about white [inaudible] community benefits, millions of dollars that have gone into our community, but not to the people who really need them, our seniors, our children, and so on and so forth. i'd also like to find out about the missing $3.5 million from the opera house. the opera house always played a role in supporting our community, and i think you all should invite danny glover. he'll tell you a lot about
that. also, you all like to talk about some trivial stuff. now, there is talk about racial equity, and i'm confounded by that because i want to know how is that linked to title 6? and i think we have other minorities that have to be -- and their issues have to be addressed -- >> clerk: good evening, caller. you have two minutes. >> yes, hi. this is yolanda williams again with the officers for justice. i want to say that i agree with commissioner hamasaki and others, that it's time for us to review the relevancy of our traffic stops, particularly
those that involve traffic infractions and misdemeanors. the optics only cause trauma to the public, and at the same time, it leads the public to question the legitimacy of policing. we also need to understand that when we are electing locations to conduct traffic stops, we should always consider doing so in well-lit areas. in the upcoming months, the officers for justice will be presenting something to the police commission [inaudible] so that when there are traffic stops, perhaps it will put them a little bit more at ease, and we'll be presenting that to the commission, so thank you very much for your time. >> clerk: good evening, caller. you have two minutes. >> hello. this is chuck [inaudible] for
bayview-hunters point. for those of us who live in bayview-hunters point who have been on both sides of the law, it's not always easy to do what they do. i've complied, i've given a little bit of a fight back. but at the end of the day, we've got folks in the bayview-hunters point that are driving recklessly every day through multiple stop signs. when you get hit, and your lives get taken, it's fine if you want to dedicate it to that, but those of us that are trying to do right in our lifetime now, we do not want to get taken out. 16-year-old got pulled over with an assault rifle in the car. that's not going to stop with just pulling them over, are you okay, are you all right?
>> clerk: president cohen, that is the end of public comment. president cohen? >> president cohen: thank you. can you please call the next item? >> clerk: item 4, presentation of the firearm discharge review board and in-custody death review board first quarter 2021 report, discussion. >> good evening, president cohen.
greg yee [inaudible] general order 3.10 charges the department to hold a firearm discharge review board, and the purpose of the board is to review the process to ensure the department is reviewing its training, policies, and procedures in light of circumstances that led to a firearms discharge by members and to determine if the discharge was in policy. likewise, in policy 812, policy deaths, a process is held to determine if the san francisco police department members acted reasonably within policy at the time of the in-custody death and evaluate the department's training policies and procedures at the time of the death. as i proceed in this first quarter of 2021, the kwierm
discharge review and in-custody death review board [inaudible] at central station in the men's locker room. so on december 3, at about 8:45 in the locker room after his shift. he was performing a personal shift of his handgun. the officer removed the magazine from the handgun and he thought he cleared the chamber. he pulled the trigger and immediately checked and found that he nobody nobody else was injured. the officer notified his supervisor of the discharge that was made. based on the presentation of this case, the recommendation
was made to the chief of police that this o.i.d., officer-involved discharge, was out of policy. moving onto the in-custody death review board, the board, in the first quarter of 2021, reviewed two cases. in-custody death 20001 and 2021. officers responded to scene and observed web traffic had -- westbound traffic had stopped in fulton street. the individual was making animal noises and waving his arms and appeared to be in an altered mental state.
the individual was ordered to walk to the northeast corner of fulton and 14 avenue but stopped a few feet from the corner. the individual was ordered to get on the ground and complied. the officers requested an ambulance due to the individual's behavior. as the officers approached the individual, they ordered him to place his hands behind his back, and he complied. the individual was handcuffed and secured to present him from standing up and running into the street. the individual was placed on his right side, in the position of recovery, while still making animal noises. the san francisco fire department removed on seen and requested the handcuffs be removed to be allowed to be placed on a back board. on january 21, approximately eight days later, the
individual was pronounced deceased. after reviewing this case, the recommendation to the chief of police was that the -- that it was in policy as relates to the officer's actions addressing psychological evaluation of adults and in-custody deaths. however, they did find insufficient evidence on a booking detention area where officers at the scene stated they placed the individual in a position of recovery while paramedics observed and reported that the individual was placed on his stomach, so this was a time -- this occurred in january 2016. this was prior to our implementation of body-worn cameras in june 2016, so there was insufficient evidence to determine which way the individual was placed. the cause of death was lethal
cardiac arrythmia due to methamphetamine intoxication, and the medical examiner determined that the cause of death was an accident. moving onto in-custody death 20001. this occurred january 20, 5:40 in the morning. officers driving southbound on sunnydale avenue, they heard what they believed to be gunshots coming from the housing units. officers observed an individual in front of 1851 sunnydale face down with a gun with his finger
on the trigger. the subject was given multiple commands to drop the gun, but he did not comply with the orders. officers from ingleside and bayview stations arrived on scene and assisted with a large crowd gathering to ensure the officers could safely deal with the subject holding the gun. a plan was formulated amongst the officers who were attempting to communicate with the subject involving their crisis intervention team training. sergeants responded to the scene, taking control and providing further directions to the subject on the scene. the subject eventually dropped the gun and the officers approached the subject and placed handcuffs on him. officers confiscated the handgun and searched the subject for wounds. officers asked the subject if he was shot, and he said no, he
was intoxicated. subject was transported to the san francisco general. once at san francisco general, the subject was rushed into surgery but later succumbed to his injuries. the recommendation, based on the information and the case presented, was that this in-custody death was in policy, however, there was an administrative finding that one officer was out of policy for not having his body-worn camera with him while on scene, and the medical examiner's report on this one, the cause of death was multiple gun shot wounds, and the manner was homicide. as we go forward, the open -- there are open officer involved shootings and in-custody death investigations. you see on this list, you will note that 18-005, that was presented during the first
quarter of 2021, however, it was returned for return review, so that is still pending, and we still have three in-custody deaths that need to be reviewed once the active criminal investigations are completed, and that is the completion of my report. >> commissioner hamasaki: i'm not sure she's on -- >> vice president elias: i am here. . >> commissioner hamasaki: thank you, commissioner -- >> vice president elias: it's
okay. does anybody have any questions? >> president cohen: i have a question. i can't find it. i'll have to look at my notes. >> i have a question that i just wanted to address because d.p.a. plays a role in the firearm discharge review, but in these cases, none of the cases that were on for this quarterly report were d.p.a. cases or cases that d.p.a. would have jurisdiction over, in case people were wondering what our role in this quarter's report was. >> commissioner dejesus: and i'm on the list, if you look -- >> vice president elias: i'm sorry. commissioner dejesus, go ahead. >> commissioner dejesus: president cohen, unless you want to go. >> president cohen: thank you. i just wanted to know, what
is -- the officer involved discharge report is a helpful report. it helps summarize and capture what's going on. what's the status of the individuals who were found in the car with the shattered window? >> i don't have that answer -- i don't believe that was covered in -- you're talking about the in-custody death in the sunnydale? >> president cohen: yes, correct. >> sorry, i don't have that. that wasn't part of our discussion during the review. >> president cohen: okay. i was wondering, is there any evidence that it was involved or may have been involved in the shooting of the subject at s.f. general? >> i'd have to pull the report and review that. >> i'm sorry. what was the question, chief cohen? >> president cohen: my question was the status of the
individuals found in the car with the shattered window? >> yes, the evidence indicates that this was -- basically, they were shooting at each other. >> president cohen: okay. did they survive? are they in custody? are they -- you know, like what's happening to them? >> they survived. i don't think there was an arrest made on that particular case, or no suspect due to the fact that they were shooting or no charges filed, any way. i don't have that report, but my memory is they were shooting at each other, and there was a real self-defense type of issue there. i don't know from memory who shot first, our decedent or the other party. >> president cohen: okay. here's eye general question that doesn't get into the
gran -- a general question that doesn't get into the granular investigation of each case. as investigative bodies, we receive the policy, we receive the data, and it's our job to translate that into policy, and i wonder if you have any ideas around how we take this number and put it into a policy? >> yeah. there are some distinct recommendations of training policy and d.r.p. particularly one that helped this department is our cmdr coordinated critical response training. we had a couple of shootings where we had a large number of officers require shots, and we saw some shortages and some gaps in man and control
coordinations, those type of things, which resulted in the development of our critical coordinated mindset response training, which some of our officered have received that block of training. we have helped the department tremendously while preventing those types of incidents to occur. other policy improvements on use of forces, now particularly with d.p.a., as director henderson -- executive director henderson mentioned, a more active role. there are some recommendations coming your way on active cases, so they do have an
impact. i think our processes have improved over the last several years. there's collaboration on the [inaudible]. >> president cohen: when did that happen? do you recall? >> the incident happened in 2018, and by 2019, we had the training, and we put a large number of officers through that training, and the feedback from that officers is it's outstanding because they appreciate the training and how it helped them do their job. >> president cohen: so what about any -- any policy movement from 2019, 2020? we're just creeping into 2021, again, given the data that's been reflected and what has
been presented? do you see any new ideas for policy coming through the pipeline? >> yeah. there was some -- [overlapping speakers] >> there are other things that i think will come either the commission's way or the department's way either by notices or training from incidents as we dig into these incidents. so i think the processes have been improved, and that one on body-worn cameras and responsibilities at the scene is something that occurred
about two years ago, but that case has just resolved and that process right now is making some of those recommended changes. >> president cohen: and when you say they're in the process right now, what are -- >> they'll be bulletins, policy reminders of when cameras should be turned off. there are instances where officers are told to turn the cameras off, when there's administrative and other things going on, public safety statement. what we found was there was some confusion going on, and upon our review, we are making those changes and adjustments.
>> president cohen: all right. another question. again, this one is general. it's regarding the timeline. some investigations have been open for quite sometime, and in general terms, what holds the investigations up from being completed? >> for many years, the criminal investigation, the decision to be made took years, sometimes, two or three years or more. that process has been shortened. the issue that we have now, and this is something that we have to try to work through with our district attorney and their staff. now that the district attorney's office has the lead on the criminal investigation, the department is not privy to the investigation. in the past, before the m.o.u., the department had to lean on the investigation. so i and your decision maker in
the department had all the information a lot quicker. now, per the agreement, and rightfully so, the district attorney's office is the lead, so we may not get all the information. witness interviews, the results of those interviews, and we really have to wait for that information before we make a decision on the policy side, and we understand why that is. we're working through that at least doing what we can do to get the information as quickly as possible. typically, the way that criminal investigations work, the criminal investigations happens first. was the officer's conduct legally justifiable? once that decision is made, then, the administrative investigation can proceed and conclude. the state law allows for tolling or that administrative case to be put on hold until that criminal investigation was
come to the conclusion, so depending on how long that takes, we typically cannot finish our administrative investigation until that investigation is complete. now previously, we had all of that information, but now, we don't. >> president cohen: okay. do we need to go back to the old way of doing business? is this new way more efficient? >> well, i think the criminal investigation by the d.a. is what people demanded. i think it should stay the way it is right now. >> president cohen: thank you, chief, for answering my questions. i'm going to yield the floor to commissioner dejesus.
[inaudible] >> i know we've had internal conversations on whatever parts of this that we have ownership of. typically, we have to wait until there's a medical examiner finding -- not typically, we do have to wait until there's a medical examiner finding, and sometimes it takes time. on top of that, we have to look at criminal culpability, as well, so it's virtually a similar process with an in-custody death. the district attorney is involved, and they make their findings, as well, so that same process is there. it's not an internal process anymore, it's an independent process, so some of it plays out depending on how long the
things. >> commissioner dejesus: it takes six years for a medical examiner's report? >> no, it doesn't take six years for a medical [inaudible]. >> commissioner dejesus: so okay. so that would have been helpful. i think it's important for us to know why there's major delays in a case. even that little bit is helpful, but the question is what are you doing about that? as the liaison, are you working with the district attorney's office and seeing what the delay is? >> yes, commissioner, we are, and the district attorney has made an offer. he's actually moving these cases quicker, and i know
there's some that he's waiting on reports. we just had that discussion this week with the district attorney myself. >> commissioner dejesus: so when you present on this, when you have cases that are old like this, you should give some semblance, some understanding as to why they're so old, why they're still open, and when's the last time it was checked on by the district attorney's office so we have a better understanding where the hiccup is. and i do want to go back to page 6, the in-custody death of the man who was making the animal sounds and was handcuffed and put on his stomach and then put on his right side. and i think the public should know, when we get these report, this is the first time we're
seeing them, too. so we're asking questions, too, for the first time. but on this one, i'm wondering, did the coroner's report [inaudible] on his stomach or his side while being handcuffed, you know, asphyxiated, did that contribute to his demise? >> the cause of death -- in the conversation -- the coroner's report said lethal cardiac arrythmia following restrain due to methamphetamine intoxication. >> and this is the policy, and i think we recently changed it after mr. floyd's death. we changed it in terms of try not to keep them handcuffed on the -- on their stomach or on their face on the ground.
is that right, chief? [inaudible] >> -- placing people in positions of recovery, i.e., rolling them on their side. what we changed this past center was inadvertent body weight on the ground was not appropriate. we've made a policy not to have people on the ground unless it's appropriate and articulate and documented and as soon as possible, you get that person off the ground, so that -- that were the changes that were -- that are in 5.01. >> commissioner dejesus: okay. okay. and then, the last thing is i can't remember the d.o.j. recommendations, but i think they had talked about -- we've talked about this before, having community transparency, maybe having community members
sitting in on it, and those people can have confidentiality orders, but just have more transparency. i think in l.a. or somewhere, one of the d.o.j. officers told us whenever these officers in one particular community uses a taser, they have to come in front of the police review board as well as a community review board, and i just want to know if we can review that and maybe have oversight on that, as well. those are my comments. >> president cohen: thank you, commissioner dejesus. i appreciate your line of questioning, and you will be missed. it's definitely got me thinking, what we need to do is extend an invitation to the district attorney to be part of this conversation or have a representative so we can add some more context around these numbers as well as a presentation. thank you. >> commissioner dejesus: great
point. thank you. >> president cohen: okay. thank you. anyone else have any -- >> commissioner hamasaki: yes. sorry. i think i share a lot of the concerns with commissioner dejesus, especially about in-custody deaths, 16-001. and remind me -- fdrb as currently situated is the command staff, somebody from d.p.a., and somebody from the commission. is that accurate? >> that's true. commissioner, the composition
of the discharge review board [inaudible] and a medical examiner. >> okay. and so, you know, i think we spoke generally about the delays in these cases. obviously, this one is from 2016, so we're over five years now on this. what was the specifically delay that caused this case to take five years to get to this
point? >> commissioner, i don't have that. i will find out that one and get back to you. >> commissioner hamasaki: does no one have ownership of a particular case? >> these cases are assigned to individual internal investigators, so they are assigned. >> commissioner hamasaki: and then, my next question is it sounded like the fighters and e.m.t. -- or i don't know if it was an individual or multiple that said the individual was placed on his stomach, and then, there was the officer or officers involved that said no, he wasn't. and was there not -- i mean, i guess, to me what was the basis for believing the police -- i'm
>> while deputy chief yee is trying to find out the answers, commissioner hamasaki, just a question on your question. i'm not seeing in the write up where there was -- that allegation that you said. i think what you read, what i'm reading, individual was placed on his right side position of recovery while still making animal noises. san francisco fire department arrived at the scene and began to evaluate the individual. and medics requested that handcuffs be removed, allowing him to be placed on the back board. the fire department says that the individual was on his stomach, and i don't know if greg said that. i don't know if he said that, but that's not what the write
up says. >> commissioner yee: yeah, chief, when i asked the question, my insufficient evidence was that they placed the subject into a position of recovery, and the reason why there's insufficient evidence to determine whether they were in or out of position on this topic is that the medical staff on scene made statements to the investigators that they observed this individual on his excuse me. >> oh, okay. >> commissioner hamasaki: and so obviously, my concern -- there has been concerns raised about the fdrb and in-custody death review a different way. i thought we were forming a serious incident review board. director henderson, can you update us on that? >> well, commissioner, i can
update you on that. commissioner, it is going on, and there is a draft. i believe commissioner elias is moving that forward, as well, so there's a draft policy and document to be flushed out, and that should be take a very long time, so that's where we are on that. >> commissioner hamasaki: i'm glad to hear that because i know this was something that i had heard good things about the process, and it -- i've never been part of the fdrb or in-custody death board, and i think, you know, from the outside, when we're having these hearings in public, there has been questions about the -- how the decisions are come to and whether or not the decisions are something that the public should have faith in, should question, and oerth, and i guess that was the point of my follow ups from deputy
chief yee. you know, when we're saying, well, here, we have the medical personnel saying one thing, and the officers saying another. is there a reason not to believe the medical personnel because the one way, the other way it could be looked at is, you know, why aren't we challenging the officers in this case because if there's neutral -- i don't know what the bias of the medical personnel would be, but maybe you have a little more information, deputy chief yee? >> yeah. i know we had a discussion with the fdrb, and i know it had to do with the medical examiner on the line and the police physician. reviewing the cause of death, my opinion that the position of death on the scene was not
contributing to the individual's death. >> commissioner hamasaki: okay. so the restraint was referring to something else. >> yeah. the restraint was if they had handcuffs on them because i asked that same question. the medical examiner has to put in that. the conditions were that the individual was in police custody under restraint, but under further discussion with them is, well, did the officer's action contribute to the death of this individual, and the determination was the individual's death was ruled an accident due to an acute methamphetamine intoxication, not the actions of the officers, and that's how the board came to the conclusion that the officers acted in policy. >> commissioner hamasaki: right. i think how it was phrased when you readout from the medical examiner using the term "restraint" and then qualifying
or clarifying that it was a dispute as to whether the individual was on their side or on their back, and i drew a conclusion from that. >> my apologies for not being clear. >> commissioner hamasaki: okay. so i don't have any further questions. >> okay. and commissioner cohen and commissioner hamasaki, we will note that and work on fixing the delays that at least the police department owns, any way. >> vice president elias: thank you, chief. i am actually on the fdrb, and when i first got on there, the delays were longer, and i
believe one of the reasons you had given back in 2018was the medical examiner taking more time on these cases. but when i look on these cases, i see a date of 2018 and it shows that there is an active investigation, which is confusing to me, because under 3304, there's only one year for an investigation unless it's tolled due to criminal investigation or matter.
criminal yet. >> vice president elias: right, and you indicate that, which is why it would explain why it's tolled, but you don't explain that on the 2018 and the 2019 case, and i think that would be helpful, as well as having perhaps the fdrb meet more frequently. >> yeah, that's another consideration. >> vice president elias: how many cases that are not even on the queue that are backlogged? >> yeah. the good news is we have a whole lot more less, in-custodies and officer-involved shootings, but the board will be meeting sometimes -- or at least be flexible when we need to increase the frequency of the
meetings. so what we can do, in moving forward, in addition to the information being requested, we can put the 3304 on there so the commission knows where we stand. i don't know, as we sit, what the criminal investigation date that stopped the tolling on these cases, but we can include that, as well. >> vice president elias: that would be helpful. thank you, chief. >> thank you. >> president cohen: all right. i don't see anymore names on the roster. i appreciate this. this is an important conversation, one of the heavier parts of our agenda. it's important that we ask these questions about in-cut deaths, and so i want to go back to the shooting that was -- i think it was in sunnydale. just for clarification, it's someone in custody. i know -- is someone in custody? i know you said people were
shooting at each other, but is someone in custody? >> i don't believe there is. i know there was some shooting that night, but i will follow up with you and the commission on that. >> president cohen: okay. no problem. so here's another question: what's the potential changes to department general order 8.12 that's being contemplated in response to this incident? are you familiar with general order 8.12, 8.12? >> is that the -- hang on a second. let me pull it up.
>> president cohen: it was noted that this d.g.o. is under revision, and there may be updates to the language contained herein. i'm just following up to see what those potential changes may be. it was in the presentation, so maybe the gentleman that made the presentation can speak to it. >> sorry about that. i'm trying to look up when 8.12 is being scheduled for review. >> president cohen: okay. >> so i don't know that there are changes on the definition of in-custody deaths. what i do know is that definitely there's some changes on things that need to be updated on that particular d.g.o. units have changed and the structure has changed. now that we have the i.a.b. and independent investigation and the d.a.s m.o.u. that we are
assigned, there's some things that have changed as far as the processes on these investigations, but i don't recall any conversation about the change of notification. >> president cohen: okay. perhaps i misread it. i saw that in the presentation that was made. it's my understanding that 8.12 is not on the review docket right now, so you and i can circle back up, and we can discuss whether we need to move it up and put it into the docket so that it can be considered for a refresh. >> thank you. >> president cohen: all right. let's continue to move on. wen of the things that i'm thinking about as i look into these presentations is extending an invitation to the district attorney and the attorney that runs the i.a.b. updating us on what they're doing and how their movement
and their effort is complementary to what the department is doing, so just -- there's a lot of moving part that's independent at the police department, and i think we need to kind of bring it all in-house and touch base. here's a question for you, chief, or mr. yee. i'm sorry. i don't know your rank. >> deputy chief yee.
>> president cohen: deputy chief yee. i want to get it right for the record. so can you tell me the reasons there was an active criminal and administrative investigation of an officer involved shooting going back over four years to january 2017, and other cases that are over three years old? and if i'm not mistaken, i think commissioner elias and petra dejesus have commented on this question. i don't recall getting a strong succinct answer. >> greg, i can answer that one from the 2017 o.i.s. that case, the district attorney is still reviewing. that case had a few things that were part of the whole court process. the person, the individual that was shot later passed away while he was in prison, and it was determined that the
injuries from the gunshots, i believe, were part of the reason for his death, so the district attorney, i know, still has that case open and still reviewing that, and i know there's been some delays because of the court proceedings that have occurred in conjunction to that case, and so that one is actually still open. i don't know if the district attorney will have an answer. >> president cohen: okay. just another example of we need to pull in the district attorney to be a part of this conversation. >> sure. >> president cohen: here's another one. why are the active criminal investigations of in-custody deaths going back almost six years, to june and july of 2015, and other cases going back to 2019? i'm just trying to get a better understanding of the time law. i will say i understand we've had a turnover in leadership, both in the district attorney's office and even in the police chief's office.
i don't know if that is an underlying cause. i'm not trying to offer excuses, but i am trying to understand more of the backlog where the congestion is happening. >> president cohen, i will have to make that inquiry. it requires my preparation for this. my focus was on the presentation. i didn't really go deep into the why of the case, and you do raise some legitimate questions why these are taking so long, so it's going to take me going back into the risk management offices to get an update on each of these cases to find out what's taking so long. >> president cohen: i appreciate that, deputy chief yee, and just as a mantra in moving forward, we need to be asking the questions why, for what reason are we seeing these numbers? i'd like to schedule you to
come back in a few weeks with some answers. i'd like to understand what the hang-up is, and perhaps we need to have you guys start reporting on a weekly basis, much in the way that the department of police accountability is reporting. this, i feel, gets to the crux of were the police commission exists. here's a larger, more global question. is six weeks an acceptable
range for this -- you know what? before you answer that, how long have you been in this role? are you new at this? >> i've been a deputy chief in administration since 2019. >> president cohen: okay. so we've got cases that predate you. >> yes. >> president cohen: okay. all right. we've got cases that predate you, so in your -- in your -- you know, in the last three years that you've been working in this role, what's the start role? how much time should we be allotting? >> right. i'm looking through d.g.o. 3.10 and 8.12, and i'm trying to pull it up for you. >> and while deputy chief yee is looking that up, i will reiterate what director henderson said a little bit ago.
whenever there are criminal investigations, we have a year before that administrative investigation -- a year from the -- the conclusion of the criminal investigation, when that administrative investigation will run statute. in other words, we have a year to complete it, so that's -- legally, we strive to do that well within the year. typically, six to nine months is about average on the time that it takes to do that type of situation. that's what we strive for. >> president cohen: okay. here's a point i wanted to make to the public but also to address in-house. looks like the d.g.o. 8.12 hasn't been updated since 2009, and that's a pretty long time.
perhaps we need to revisit that, and to the extent possible, we should be publicly discussing and informing people the reasons for delay, the reasons for these cases of being delayed, and then, we should be receiving, discussing, and analyzing recommendations, and then ultimately approving recommendations to minimize these types of delays. as of right now, i have no idea why -- why this -- a few of these cases are so delayed, and it doesn't sound like anyone on this call is able to answer that question. please come back with the answers to this question. it's important. i want to go beyond the statute that -- that should be reported to -- to this commission. one other thing that i want to highlight is that d.g.o. 3.10,
which we all know is currently under review, that should create a serious incident review board that will hopefully fold both of these into one, which might help alleviate some of the backlog problem. but the district attorney, we need to ask these types of questions of the district attorney so we can get further information as to where the backlog is. these are all questions that i think people would like to know. inquiring minds would like to know, like the old commercial. i'm going to -- i'm going to move on. i don't want to harp on this if there's no one questions. i don't see anyone else in the chat. sergeant youngblood, could you please call the next item. thank you, deputy chief yee, and chief. i appreciate your responses. >> clerk: public comment. the public is now welcome to make public comment on-line item 4, presentation of the
firearms discharge review board. members of the public that would like to make a public comment, please press star, three now. good evening, caller. you have two minutes. >> hello, chief scott, director henderson. this is zach long from the public defender's office, and thank you for discussing the cases. it's possible that none of these cases under review will warrant discipline, but the lengthy discussion is the culmination of officers' sometimes deadly actions. these investigations take years, the appeals take years, yet the return to duty decisions occurs within weeks. the disparity is huge. thank you. >> president cohen: speaker, what's your name?
>> i'm zach dillon from the public defender's office. >> president cohen: okay. may i follow up with you tomorrow? >> yes. >> president cohen: okay. thank you. next caller? >> clerk: president cohen, that is the end of public comment. >> president cohen: okay. i appreciate that. can we call the next line item? >> clerk: line item 5, presentation regarding mental health awareness month and discussion and possible action to issue department bulletin, green pin campaign in support of mental health awareness month, may 2021, which temporarily modified department general or the 10.01, uniform and equipment classes, discussion and possible action. >> president cohen: before we go into the presentation, i just want to thank the people that are getting ready to make this presentation. we all recognize the link between investigation and mental health, and i believe it
makes the job increasingly more difficult. it's important that all public officials, especially those who are the first responders, emphasize that help is available to persons with mental health challenges. i'm glad we are acknowledging this, i'm glad that we're here discussing this, and it shows that police officials commitment to mental health, and it releases the taboo that exists in many cultures around mental health illness. so i'm excited to hear this presentation, and i will yield the floor to the presenter. thank you for joining us today. i think we have carrie here. >> president cohen, this is commander o'sullivan. >> president cohen: commander o'sullivan.
>> great to see you, as well. i am rob o'sullivan. i am the commander assigned to the risk management office, and i am here in my capacity tonight as a member of the san francisco police department's wellness team. with me this evening is mrs. carrie beshears. carrie is the manager of the health management system for the city and county of san francisco, and also is christine demakalis, who is also a member of the wellness team, as is carrie. christine is really the blue that has held our team together. commissioner, as you mentioned, today, we're here tonight to ask you approval to wear a ribbon and for our members to
most resilient among us. and experience mental health disorder. naturally, the pandemic has always changed that. so we're seeing. in addition to the stress, you add a lot of other unprecedented events that have happened in the past years. the wild fires, the contested election. the insurrection on capitol hill. those are just a few. add the work plus all of these other elements in the past year, you can only imagine the stress that it's put on all of us, particularly on our mental health and emotional well being. go ahead and advance the next
slide. and, so each year, may is a focus for mental health awareness month. naturally, it's an opportunity to join the national movement. this is actually our second year doing this. we're looking to enhance how we are elevating mental awareness. so the san francisco mental health service system is looking to bring resources to our entire employee base, but to drive team to those resources. so i won't go through all of them just for the essence of time, but we are looking at increasing to call volume particularly to e.a.p. services. we also will be doing some increase pushes to the cortico app which is for our first responders groups to elevate resources specifically to mental health. and our mind resources that we have.
some of the things that i necessarily haven't mentioned, but you can go ahead and advance the next slide, we also will be looking at some training. we currently are offering mental health first aid training as well through our department and we'll be looking at our uptick in departments taking advantage of those trainings. so we're, as i mentioned, we're doing a lot of other webinars to elevate for our topics to be engaged. worry, anxiety. burn-out and depression. and so, with that, that's just a really high level overview. i'm going to turn it back over to commander o'sullivan to talk about the other training opportunities. >> thank you. so specific to the sfpd, the wellness team in concert with our behavioral science unit, we
have been in contact with representatives of california p.o.s.t. which is an acronym for peace officer standard training. they have made available grants funded training, which is titled "navigating adversity" and it will explore eight dimensions of wellness and our members both sworn and professional staff will be afforded the opportunity to take this self-guided training. it will be in two-hour blocks over eight consecutive weeks. we first learned about this training through our contact with the san francisco sheriff's department. our sheriff's department behavioral science units speak on a regular basis and leadership of that department sheriff miamoto saw fit to see
his deputies go through the training and his recommendation comes highly to us. we are asking for a temporary modification which governs our uniform standards. we're asking sworn members to wear the pin, the medal pin above the name plate on officer uniform and then again on the right breast of a shirt or blouse or sweater or professional staff members. next slide. here's a picture of the pin. i've spoke to the training that we're going to offer. carry has spoken to h.s.f. efforts will be during the course of the month.
and, this is a photograph, the pin here is photoshoppe onto this picture so you can see the green pin above the name plate and this is actually christine danopolis who is on the call with us and one of our captain's captain nick. and with that, we're happy to take your questions. >> thank you for the presentation, both of you. appreciate it. let me see if my colleagues have any questions. i see hands in the chat. i don't think we have any questions. i think this is just self-explanatory. >> commissioner yee: i have a question. >> president cohen: commissioner yee. thank you. >> commissioner yee: i just want to know how many officers or staff are trained on this mental health department
because i know this covid-19 has hit the department and your membership hard so are there enough staff there to recognize that and to bring it out to meet the officers one on one, number one. and, number two, if they see it, they should report it and bring it in. that's more important for us and the public too as well as the officers in the department. so looking forward, is there any additional training that the officers may need too regards to substance abuse and looking to see how we can stem it going forward. >> thank you, commissioners. so to answer those questions, we have a very highly regarded behavioral science unit. in fact, the unit which is
staffed by sworn members, our unit dates back to i believe the late 70s or early 80s and it's been recognized around the country as a national model. and, to that end, it's well-known throughout the department that for any member whether professional staff are sworn that, number one, anybody that feels that they're in need of help can reach out to the payroll science unit and similarly, members can confidentially reach out to express their concerns about a member. so as to with regards to this particular training, we are tentatively scheduled to start on wednesday, may the 12th. so it will be the middle of may. obviously, we see the significance of offering this training during mental health awareness month. we hope to have several hundreds of our members go through the training and as
each of the modules are completed, the california post representatives which includes mentors both sworn and nonsworn individuals, we will be soliciting feedback from the participants so that adjustments if needed can be made. and, i think finally, you raise a question or a comment about what other training is out there and our behavioral science unit on a regular presents at the academy with regards to services, the mental health services that are available to the membership. we've also for the training division, captain jack heart's done a wonderful job of bringing forth blue courage training, inclusive leadership training and more recently a leadership development institute that began in fall of 2019 and has significant amount
of discourse within that ten-month program has to do with mental, physical, and emotional health. so it's something we feel very proudly of that we're addressing and as we move forward in the future, we endeavor to do more mental health related training. >> thank you. >> commissioner yee: you know. i think this is great. this is wonderful. always glad to see the department making sure that the members are provided the resources that they need, you know. i think regardless, it can be a very intense and high pressure job that can have real impacts and we certainly see that on the backside, on the discipline side with people that end up in
drugs or alcohol issues and so i guess my question is, you know, do we get the sense or the feeling that, you know, people are reaching out before it gets to that point? are we having success in, you know, this because, you know, my work involves seeing a lot of death and violence, but i'm not right up there and personal with it. you know, it impacts me and so i can't imagine the intensity of it and the impact on people and, you know, just wanting to -- i'm hopeful that people are, you know, getting through whatever, you know, a lot of people have bias against seeking mental health help. what's your sense of that
within the department now? are we making improvements and strides in that sense? >> first, thank you for recognizing just how the demands of the job can result in having adverse effects on our mental health. our behavioral science unit is staffed by four sworn members right now and it is a 24/7 hour job they are busy seven days a week and i say that to your question in to being utilized. with regards to the reception of the department, i we have a department that in terms of 10 year is on the younger side and
that's very cyclical. that's not unique to the san francisco police department. that happens throughout municipal law enforcement agencies throughout the united states and my sense is that with this generation, they're much more receptive to being outspoken about their concerns and their need to access services and that is really significant because there was a time that, you know, for the more senior folks in this department having those discussions and then commissioner. >> president cohen: commissioner. >> president cohen: >> president cohen: alluded to it. we do have a membership that i get to generalize i think is very receptive. they're very hungry for these
types of resources and it gets back to what mrs. biershear said earlier. the city and county correct me if i'm wrong, every monday in the month of may is going to send out an e-mail to approximately 25,000 of us employees to talk about these webinars and make these issues available. so there's a response regarding the san francisco police department, but i think it extends to, you know, the full family and city and county of san francisco that people are much more open than just five, ten years ago just to kind of put round numbers on it to access these services. >> commissioner hamasaki: that's incredibly clear. that's important work. we'd much rather see people getting help in early stages rather than ending up with discipline and problems on the job. i think we all support this
work. >> commissioner hamasaki, if i could just add, we have an app that's been implemented for over a year. from what i'm told, officers are taking advantage of that as well. they have 24/7 access through that app with licensed clinicians. so that's also available for officers as well and i'm told that they are putting that to good use as well. >> commissioner hamasaki: good to know. thanks, chief. >> president cohen: any other questions, colleagues? so it is informative to know that this is a procedural question and that you can temporarily modify d.g.o.s i was unaware of this that you can temporarily modify d.g.o.s.
how do you do this? what's the procedure? >> yeah. so sorry, chief. >> go ahead. >> okay. so, yeah, we have a course. i don't know. it should have been sent to you in the materials ahead of the meeting and commissioner cohen, that's how we do it. we notice the department through a department notice. we went through a similar process with breast cancer awareness with the patches. that is during the month of october and similarly during the month of june for pride. so i believe, you know, after this discussion, sergeant youngblood will ask to take a vote which i don't want to get ahead of ourselves here, but i think you'll be voting on the
modification just for the month of may for us to wear the pin and then, once may concludes, then we're no longer authorized to wear the pin. >> president cohen: thank you. if there are no other questions, we can keep moving. thank you. >> and i think with that commissioner cohen i'll make an attempt to modify d.g.o.1 so we can support the campaign: >> commissioner: i'll second. >> president cohen: i lost track of the conversation. where are we? >> we're about to take public comment. >> clerk: all right. so members of the public who
you have six yeses. >> president cohen: great. motion passes. let's celebrate. congratulations. good job. next item, please. >> line item six. discussion and possible action to approve revised draft department general order 3.09 "department awards," for meeting with the conferring san francisco police officer's association as required by law. this is a discussion and possible action item. >> thank you. first of all, i just want to start by thanking -- commissioner cohen you mentioned this as well. and also executive director paul henderson and the team at the department of speech accountability who also helped us.
this is several years in the making. but i just want to point out outline what the changes are for the commission in the public and what i think are improvements in the process in terms of initiative and incentives for the type of behavior and activity that, you know, the department and i think our community wants to reward, in addition to valor. so i'll go through this. and i'll try to do it quickly. october 2016, the u.s. department of justice published this report on sfpd. the report found among others things that the sfpd does not have multilevel recognition such as community engagement, recognition, expression under duress and problem solving. the version 3.nine addresses
the two u.s. d.o.j. based on the above finding. sfpd recognizes power and authority with good community outcomes to traditionally recognize acts and bravery and the sfpd should implement departmentwide for officer of the month as one way to begin to advance a code to guardianship. the revisions to 3.nine are broken down into four categories. first, addressing the u.s. d.o.j. recommendation. second, adding additional types of awards for recognition. third -- i can't say the word sorry. remedying the award and process for the outlining prior to the police commission for approval. so in the first category, the u.s. d.o.j. recommended that we add a crisis intervention team
award to d.g.o.3.09 and that was done in this upgrade. while this award is mentioned in d.g.o.5.201. placing the award in dgo309. the award is listed right after medal of valor, the notorious conduct award and the life-saving award and above all other department awards to demonstrate the importance in sfpd's commitment to the c.i.t. program. the award now with the passage, hopefully the passage and approval of the d.g.o. hopefully will come with a monetary award. second thing is expanding the award. for employing deescalation techniques. exhibiting violent behavior or making credible threats of
violence and also when a member resolves an incident with minimal or no use of force, that member should be rewarded. and, lastly, on this category, contributing on the development program, policies, and procedures that support the department commission and goals. the next category created the community policing problem solving award and there are two types of this award that's being proposed in this d.g.o. revision. the first is the strategic problem solving award which will be granted to a member for an original approach to solving an ongoing problem and the second time type is the community engagement award in creative and innovative community projects. the next category is the officer of the month last year. this award recognizes one member each month who uses community policing practices and advances the police officer
as a guardian culture. in january of each year, the officer of the year is selected from the group of twelve officers of the month. all sworn members are eligible for this award regardless of this assignment. and i'd like to point out we had our first officer of the month ceremony this past month because of covid, we had to limit the attendance, but it was very well received and the officers that received the award, it was hard selection. we had a lot of officers that qualified, but the officers that were selected really epitomized this guardian mentality and thought process that we want in our police department and they were very well deserved. additional types of awards and recognition includes leadership, development, graduate award which is awarded to the department members who graduated from sfpd's leadership development institute which we implemented
last year to really promote, develop leaders throughout the organization of all ranked schools professional staff and nonmembers. next category of awards says outside nomination which encouraged this member to nominate fellow member awards for outside nomination. any member nominated is not procolluded from being nominated for an sfpd award and the final category is the u.s. armed forces service ribbon. members who served in the military prior to joined sfpd or currently serving authorized where the u.s. armed services ribbon in recognition and appreciation of their service. next, feature i'd like to point out in this policy revision, we are attempting to remedy inequities in the awards
process. the d.g.o. defines the member to include all department members. this change allows all members including professional staff or nonmembers of our department to be eligible for most of the award. the composition of the award screening committee was increased from three to five to allow for increase in policing and policing experience, increase in diversity and opinions. the chief of police has required to ensure the composition of the award screening committee reflects the diversity of the department as i just noted. also, all nominated members identifying information on documents submitted to the award screening committee will be redacted. so, in other words, the nominated member, that information will be redacted. so that doesn't impact the awards. it's the acts, not the people nominating. also, we've removed the provision that allowed for waiving of voting by secret
ballots. the next category that is touched upon with this revision is certifying nominations prior to sending member's names to the police commission for approval. with this d.g.o. now the police and two commissioners convene in sending the nomination and names of the nominees to the commission for full approval. if a nomination cannot be certified, the chief of police and two commissioners shall reconvene every 60 days until such time as this panel with the chief and the two commissioners either certify or deny the member's nomination. that was something i wanted to thank dpa for raising and commissioner de jesus as well. before the commission perceives
those member nominees and members of the department. so, again, those are the highlights. i do think it is a tremendous upgrade. that really has gotten us over the hurdle in terms of this d.o.j. recommendation, this reform recommendation. i think it rewards the type of behavior we had not rewarded before and i think it's going to be transformative in terms of our department moving forward. thank you to commissioner dejesus, former commissioner taylor and i ask that the commission approve this d.g.o. and move it forward to meet and confer. thank you and i'm available for any questions. >> president cohen: thank you for that overview, chief. there is one person that i also want to recognize and that is rachel killshaw who's been instrumental in helping to get
this over the finish line. >> you're absolutely right and, rachel, if you're on the line, i apologize because rachel was really the glue that held us together and thank you for mentioning that because i forgot to mention it. but, rachel did a tremendous amount of work on this. thank you for mentioning that. >> president cohen: absolutely. so everything that you've said, i want to associate myself with your comments. it's totally, this award is totally consistent with all of our reform initiatives that we include rewards for crisis intervention and community oriented policing problem solving valor is an important. not everyone has valor and integrity so we want to celebrate those officers that are demonstrating it and applying it to their everyday work and i will see if colleagues have any questions or comments that they'd like to
add. i particularly want to acknowledge commissioner dejesus if there's anything she wanted to. >> i'm sorry. my name's in the chat. i did want to speak to it. >> president cohen: please do. ment >> [inaudible] and rachel. it can change so dramatically. i've been with the commission for a long time. my impression of these boards were people got the medals who were involved in officer-involved shootings and sometimes those clash because they would get a gold medal but the investigations would be open or they'd be in civil court in violation with civil rights so we have been trying to find a balance where we
understand the whole picture before an award is given. but one of the things this award did take into consideration with the d.o.j. requesting it and it's so much broader now community oriented problem solving. you know the officer of the month, i mean, the officer of the year. so it's really broadened not just [inaudible] and so i mean like women, you know, women can qualify in here as well. so with all that being said, some of the concerns that we had that was holding us back, before i go there, i want to say we have awarded the [inaudible] it's been held up for a long time and the d.o.j. and it's
really important to keep this department moving forward. [inaudible] unfortunately some have had incidences and we've had to go through them. the 2% of d.p.a. was we wanted to know about any criminal investigations. so that's [inaudible] and then the second thing the dpa points out is they'll look at anything that might be in their record except for if it's 18 months pass. as you can see now, some of these investigations go on longer than 18 months and that was a concern that d.p.a. pointed and some of the ways that the chief has tried to remedy that is we have two
commissioners now who sit through the application process and i think it did work really well with us and i think the chief was really open to some of our concerns and he made decisions based on concerns and trying to move forward. those were the two issues that were raised. then we came back in 60 days. i think it worked a little with the chief. those are the concerns going forward because we waited too long, we really tried to go through to see where people were in their job right now and in the record right now. once we reach that census, i
think we need to move forward, but i just wanted to raise the concern that one [inaudible] and the other one [inaudible] is raised. other than that, i think this could work. >> thank you for raising those issues, those were issues that the dd.p.a. has raised in the past. one of the things has been the actual use of the court. and so there's no from the because those reports are turned over from the d.p.a.. those are some of the concerns that we had voiced before. i won't go over what they were. again, it was just making sure
that the department has notice or was put on notice as to officers that were being investigated or d.p.a. was in the process of continuing an investigation. and so -- that's my only comment. thank you for following up and having our recommendation as part of the consideration. >> commissioner hamasaki: so if i can jump in, i think one of the lines and this line has been an issue for years now which is at page 6, i'm sorry, on page 7 of the document and that would be the certification of nominations and there's a last line on section 1d which states "or 18 months that
passed from the date of the oi.s. whichever is sooner" and so that is the line that i think is still a problem and i would suggest that we strike that line because, you know, what it creates is a situation that petro was explaining which is where if the investigation hasn't been concluded and we're issuing somebody an award and it comes back that it's not in policy, i think that would be a terrible look for the department. so i do understand there's interest in moving these along. the issue has to be in the investigation sooner and not issuing the award before the investigation is complete.
and i don't know of any other way to fix this because i know we've debated this for literally years now. this debate predated my arrival on the commission which is 2018. >> commissioner hamasaki, can i be heard on that issue. i believe the checks and balances on that issue. the commissioners who sit on that committee, if i'm not the seat, as this moves forward. so that's the first opportunity if the commissioners do not feel comfortable moving forward with an award because it's an open investigation which probably won't be likely anyway when we get to that stage, but
i hear you. that's the first stage. it wouldn't go through. because if that's the will of the commission, the commission has two votes and it's a democratic process and it wouldn't go through. but the other catch is the final approval on the award with the full board of the commission. so if the full board is not comfortable with what's presented to the commission regardless of whether that issue or any other issue can be caught at that level too. i think one of the things with the 18 months with where we are now, i know we just had an serb with some older cases on it. e.t.a. is moving much faster and the d.a. is moving much faster. i hope that those checks and balances were put in place to catch those types of issues if the two commissioners like were
not comfortable moving this forward, the case is not done yet it could be called by the full commission. so i hope that satisfies. >> you know, i do appreciate that, you know, the idea of trying to remedy in that way. you know, like we've always discussed with any individual like commissioner or even the chief, we're not always going to be in these seats, the chief's not always going to be in his seat and we should draft policies regardless of the confidence that we have in ourselves and the chief. to me, i think setting a bright line allows for more confidence in that we will not get it wrong because, you know, it's just not something that would reflect well on the commission
for the department if we got it wrong. >> president cohen: thank you, commissioner. are there any other folks on the commission that would like to speak to this? all right. seeing none. i just want to indicate that i am actually in full support of the award and i do believe that the needed checks and balances are in place. i agree with the chief that the commissioners are part of the certification process and there's been a lot of deliberation back and forth on this and now we are at a point where we've got the chief of the executive director of d.p.a. on board so i guess this is just a commission matter and i just want this to go on
record that i'm voting aye for this. i don't see anyone in the chat. so why don't we go to public comment on this item. >> clerk: members of the public that would like to make public comment online item 6 regarding d.g.o.3.09, department awards, please press star 3 now. and, president cohen, there are no public comments. >> president cohen: let's go ahead and put this item to a vote or let me see, motion to approve. is there a motion? >> commissioner: motion to approve d.g.o.3.09. >> president: perfect. all right. i will second that motion. please call the vote. >> clerk: on the motion to approve dgo3.0904
there is no public comment. >> president cohen: okay. >> line item 8 is a vote on whether to hold item 9 in closed session including vote on whether to assert the attorney client privilege. >> commissioner: motion to go in closed session. >> president cohen: second. motion made by brookter, seconded by -- >> can we invoke the attorney client privilege, please. >> president cohen: of course. motion to hold item 9 in closed session including the invocation or the assertion of attorney client privilege in regards to item 9. in section 67.10.
>> clerk: you have four yeses. line item 11, action item, adjournment. >> you have to take public comment? >> clerk: yes. for members of the public that would like to make public comment regarding line item 10, please press star, three now if you would like to make public comment. no public comment. >> vice president elias: he's seeing if we're awake. that's what it is. >> clerk: all right. line item 11, adjournment. action item. >> commissioner dejesus: move to adjourn. >> second. >> clerk: all right. on the motion to adjourn -- [roll call]
day, turning our faces toward the sun and looking to help recover our businesses. we are couraging you to take the -- encouraging you to take the small business challenge, and the small business challenge, is for the month of may, can you shop and dine at only small businesses. with that, i'd like to introduce mayor breed, who's been such an advocate for small businesses. it's been a pleasure to work with her office in creating shared spaces, so with that, mayor breed. [applause] >> the hon. london breed: hello, everyone. i am really excited to be here at manny's, with manny, who is not just the owner of this really wonderful space, but a
commissioner with sharky on our small business commission, when we put these two together, they make magic happen, and part of that magic is really advocating fiercely for small businesses in san francisco. throughout the pandemic, they have been key for pushing for supports and fee and permit waivers for a number of small businesses in san francisco, especially for the people that they play. in san francisco, i'm proud that we stepped up early on. we waived fees, we provided grants and loans and no interest loans and other resources to small businesses. in total, san francisco has provided about $75 million throughout the course of this pandemic, not including state and federal resources, but to
help our small business community. last week, i was in japantown, announcing an additional $10.6 million in grants for small businesses who could not get access to p.p.p. loans and some of the other resources. because when san francisco starts to open, what's important to me is that we all recover together, and what that means is making sure that we support one another. not just through city resources, but by going to our local stores and our businesses and our communities. now since this pandemic began, i am really proud that i would go out and walk in the neighborhoods, i would go to some of the these businesses, i would just walk down the street if i needed to pick up a plunger for my toilet or anything else -- go to the local hardware store or anyplace where i needed anything, and you know what? if we just take a moment to
look around us, all the things that we may typically honestly order on amazon, we can find them right here in shops right here in our city right here in our neighborhood. [applause] >> the hon. london breed: now although i appreciate the selection and fast delivery of amazon because i have needs, i also appreciate and want to keep in business mom-and-pops, like sammy, who he and his mom get up every morning at 4:00 to make it to their dry cleaners at 6:00 to get all the machines ready and do all the work. this is a family-owned business, and i've been going here because i was a kid, and because people aren't getting things dry cleaned as much, they've been struggling. it's important to me, as someone who uses them, it's important for me to continue to
use them even when it's a small thing and i could probably clean it myself. it's important for me to support plant stores during the pandemic. i went from zero to 31, and i think now, i have 33. as soon as i walk past or drive past any plant store, i have to go in. there's an aquarium on clement street that has not just fish but really good plants. there's furniture stores right here in the mission? what's the name of fiona's place? >> harrington furniture. >> the hon. london breed: it's
a third generation irish family that owns it. you can go visit fiona, and she can get you anything that you want. there's something about connecting to your community. there's something about connecting to the small businesses in your community. it helps them stay in business, but it also helps us stay a better community as a whole. some of you remember food land. it turned into another store, but we all called it food land, and we knew everybody that worked there because that's what being in the community is about. when we take the time to do that, something different
happens. we connect, we connect with community. so what we're asking people to do for the month of may is to connect with community, to connect with our small businesses, to go out of your way, to go out of your way -- well, not just go out of your way, but to make effort to buy locally. during this pandemic, this is what i've been doing, is going to my businesses. crystal way and a number of other crystal shops, they've been taking all my money, and plant shops have been taking all my money. i have a candle obsession, and i've been buying some candles at places down the street, as well. there's so many opportunities to shop locally, to dine locally, to help san francisco
locally. let's roll up our sleeves, san francisco, in may, to buying our coffee locally, to support a small business that we've never visited before, and i'm committed, as we come out of this pandemic, our recovery begins, and we come out stronger and more vibrant and more resilient than ever, and that means that we leave no san franciscan and no san franciscan business behind. thank you for joining us. don't forget, #sanfranciscosmall
businesschallenge. ultimately, i will be supporting small businesses in san francisco, and i invite all of you here to take the challenge. >> we put some crystals down here for the mayor. >> the hon. london breed: good energy. >> so we have a special surprise guest. state assemblyman david chiu will be making a couple of marks. >> good morning, san francisco. we ready to shop locally? all right. so usually, i'm in sacramento on a wednesday, but i happened to be in town for a few hours, and i got the word this is happening. i have to tell you, i am so excited about this challenge, and the mayor, i know, has laid out just how incredibly challenging it has been for our small businesses. in chinatown, a year ago, in february, the small businesses in our country's oldest and
most historic chinatown reported a 50% drop in business because of the expectation that, somehow, covid was floating around chinatown, and that has impacted not just that neighborhood but every commercial corridor in our city. i think the stats are close to 60% drops in revenues in small businesses in our city. so when i was contacted by sharky and ben bleiman and others about this idea, it's brilliant, but i know it's going to take a commitment, and i will tell you, as i was running out of the house to join this, i asked my wife, i said hey, babe, i'm going to take this challenge. can you join me, and it literally delayed me five minutes because she said, dave, we often buy at big box stores. how are we going to do this challenge? i promised i am going to be
buying all the groceries, but we have to do that because our small businesses are the heart of our economy, are the heart of our character and the heart of our city. i want to say, i just want to thank all the small business leaders. years ago, my very first position -- my first public position in this city, i was a small business commissioner. and 14, 15, 16 years ago, we did not have the energy, the vision, the creativity of the leadership that we're seeing right at this moment, and we need that leadership more than ever, so just want to thank all of you who are hearing, moving this forward. let's get this done, make the challenge, and keep it going. thank you so much. >> and dave, i just want to say, my wife and i had the same discussion, and a 15-minute debate. so with that, i'm going to
introduce manny yekutiel, who is the owner of manny's and who is a small business commissioner. >> thank you. i just want to say welcome to manny's. it's many things in one, and i just want to say how happy i am to be able to stand here on our shared spaces and say, we survived, we made it. honestly, i think a lot of small business owners were sure that this day would come, and i want to say, i think a third of the businesses that were opened in january 2020 are closed. we don't know how many are closed temporarily, how many are closed permanently.
but i am so excited because one, if you take this san francisco, if you get your token and you use it, you will be bringing much needed business to small businesses like mine. secondly, with this challenge, it'll change some of the behaviors of our fellow san franciscans, and next time we want to order something off amazon or something for convenience sakes, they will remember the mom-and-pop hardware store in the neighborhood. they'll remember the small coffee shop in the neighborhood, and they'll say, i'm going to go support that small business. thank you to sharky laguana, the president of the san francisco small business commission, for taking this idea and making it so amazing and running with it. thank you so much to mayor breed for our tireless support of small businesses for the last 1.5 years, for getting it
up and passed, and helping our retail and small business establishments survive, for finding $1.75 million for grants for our small businesses. thank you to assemblyman chiu for fighting for small businesses in the california state assembly. and thank you to everyone who will, for the next 30 days, will take the challenge and say, for the next 30 days, i pledge to only shop at small businesses and help san francisco small businesses emerge out of this pandemic. thank you so much. >> thank you so much, manny, and we'll take questions at this time. [inaudible]
>> the hon. london breed: you know, san francisco has really been very conservative in its reopening efforts, so even though the state has given us permission to go into the orange tier, we did not allow all of what was allowed under california state law to happen. we've proceeded with caution, and now with our hospitalization rates down, the number -- our reproductive rate and other things, we are able to do more, so we're able to allow live music, we're able to allow venues and other places, and as you can see, the ballpark can allow for fans. when we're starting to open more, we still have a requirement to wear a mask, and the businesses and the entertainment, they will understand what those requirements are, and we expect
them to be followed. for example, i was at a restaurant last night, and when the waiter was coming up, we still put on our masks even though we still were vaccinated. we want to make sure that people get vaccinated. we have about 60% of san franciscans that have received at least their first shot, and we're in a good place, but it doesn't mean we can get comfortable. we still have to follow the health orders. enjoy san francisco, enjoy our small businesses, but do our very best to wear your mask and limit our interactions with people. [inaudible] >> the hon. london breed: no. what we did first, we deferred
city fees for 20 and 21. so many of the fees, the bills that people get on a regular basis, they don't necessarily have to pay, so we deferred them. but then, we took it a step further and provided financial resources so that even though we can't say -- we had to come up with the money when we said to businesses, we're going to defer these fees, but now, you don't have to pay them, and so we had to come up with money in our budget to makeup for that particular resource, so there are going to be many small businesses that will not have to pay city fees, so that's one of the things that we've done. we also have provided grants and loans, no-interest loans, and just last week, i announced an additional $6.10 million of grants to people who may not have been able to qualify for other things. so we have a whole spectrum of things: the latino revolving
loan fund, the black resolving loan fund, so those are some of the major things -- of course, shared spaces, our equity applicants. about 40% of people who have shared spaces are minority owned businesses and have gotten some level of city support to do so. we tried to make it as easy as possible. when the voters approved the proposition to make it easier to streamline the process -- for example, a woman who had a nail salon, she was able to get a permit within one day that allowed her to reopen her business as an ice cream parlor. so it's cutting the red tape so we can get businesses open.
the city should not be an impediment to the ability of small businesses to operate in this city, especially as we're on our road to recovery. [inaudible] >> the hon. london breed: i am sorry. i can't hear you. [inaudible] >> the hon. london breed: i think we're going to have to continue doing some of the things that we're doing. there are a lot of -- i hear restaurants. they're having trouble with hiring people, and we want to make sure a small business owner, that's a mom-and-pop shop, as they expand, they can find people to work in their shop and afford to live in san francisco. it's going to be a balance, so when there are resources available, there will be money in our upcoming budget that i will introduce to allow some additional support for our small business community, but
we also have to continue to connect our businesses with the resources -- thanks goodness we have a new president and vice president because that has been so critical in helping to provide more resources to small businesses who have been struggling the most, so we definitely anticipate we will be doing more. [inaudible] >> the hon. london breed: so part of why we added an additional $10.6 million in grants are for those businesses that are having the most difficult time, where they have to go through a process to access city resources. this is about those who could not get resources, who have, like, six employees or less who are struggling and need support. but also, we're not here to micromanage what they use the money for. we know there's a moratorium
against evictions for rent. that moratorium expires for the state at the end of june, i think it is, june 30. we know that rent is still going to come down, and we're going to need these resources, so our office of economic and workforce development has been working so hard with so many of these businesses. it wasn't a loan pool, it was a grant pool, and we removed so many of these barriers to be able to access this money. all right. don't forget, shop local businesses, #smallbiz, b-i-z, because manny doesn't know how to spell. small business challenge. thank you all so much.
>> even though people move away, whenever they come back to the city, they make it here. and they tell us that. >> you're going to get something made fresh, made by hand and made with quality products and something that's very, very good. ♪♪ >> the legacy bars and restaurants was something that was begun by san francisco simply to recognize and draw attention to the establishments. it really provides for san francisco's unique character. ♪♪ >> and that morphed into a request that we work with the city to develop a legacy business registration. >> i'm michael cirocco and the owner of an area bakery.
♪♪ the bakery started in 191. my grandfather came over from italy and opened it up then. it is a small operation. it's not big. so everything is kind of quality that way. so i see every piece and cut every piece that comes in and out of that oven. >> i'm leslie cirocco-mitchell, a fourth generation baker here with my family. ♪♪ so we get up pretty early in the morning. i usually start baking around 5:00. and then you just start doing rounds of dough. loaves. >> my mom and sister basically handle the front and then i have my nephew james helps and then my two daughters and my wife come in and we actually do the baking. after that, my mom and my sister stay and sell the product, retail it.
♪♪ you know, i don't really think about it. but then when i -- sometimes when i go places and i look and see places put up, oh this is our 50th anniversary and everything and we've been over 100 and that is when it kind of hits me. you know, that geez, we've been here a long time. [applause] ♪♪ >> a lot of people might ask why our legacy business is important. we all have our own stories to tell about our ancestry. our lineage and i'll use one example of tommy's joint. tommy's joint is a place that my husband went to as a child and he's a fourth generation san franciscan. it's a place we can still go to today with our children or grandchildren and share the stories of what was san francisco like back in the 1950s.
>> i'm the general manager at tommy's joint. people mostly recognize tommy's joint for its murals on the outside of the building. very bright blue. you drive down and see what it is. they know the building. tommy's is a san francisco hoffa, which is a german-style presenting food. we have five different carved meats and we carve it by hand at the station. you prefer it to be carved whether you like your brisket fatty or want it lean. you want your pastrami to be very lean. you can say i want that piece of corn beef and want it cut, you know, very thick and i want it with some sauerkraut. tell the guys how you want to prepare it and they will do it
right in front of you. san francisco's a place that's changing restaurants, except for tommy's joint. tommy's joint has been the same since it opened and that is important. san francisco in general that we don't lose a grip of what san francisco's came from. tommy's is a place that you'll always recognize whenever you lock in the door. you'll see the same staff, the same bartender and have the same meal and that is great. that's important. ♪♪ >> the service that san francisco heritage offers to the legacy businesses is to help them with that application process, to make sure that they really recognize about them what it is that makes them so
special here in san francisco. ♪♪ so we'll help them with that application process if, in fact, the board of supervisors does recognize them as a legacy business, then that does entitle them to certain financial benefits from the city of san francisco. but i say really, more importantly, it really brings them public recognition that this is a business in san francisco that has history and that is unique to san francisco. >> it started in june of 1953. ♪♪ and we make everything from scratch. everything. we started a you -- we started a off with 12 flavors and
mango fruits from the philippines and then started trying them one by one and the family had a whole new clientele. the business really boomed after that. >> i think that the flavors we make reflect the diversity of san francisco. we were really surprised about the legacy project but we were thrilled to be a part of it. businesses come and go in the city. pretty tough for businesss to stay here because it is so expensive and there's so much competition. so for us who have been here all these years and still be popular and to be recognized by the city has been really a huge honor. >> we got a phone call from a woman who was 91 and she wanted to know if the mitchells still owned it and she was so happy
that we were still involved, still the owners. she was our customer in 1953. and she still comes in. but she was just making sure that we were still around and it just makes us feel, you know, very proud that we're carrying on our father's legacy. and that we mean so much to so many people. ♪♪ >> it provides a perspective. and i think if you only looked at it in the here and now, you're missing the context. for me, legacy businesses, legacy bars and restaurants are really about setting the context for how we come to be where we are today. >> i just think it's part of san francisco. people like to see familiar stuff. at least i know i do. >> in the 1950s, you could see a picture of tommy's joint and looks exactly the same. we haven't change add thing. >> i remember one lady saying, you know, i've been eating this
ice cream since before i was born. and i thought, wow! we have, too. >> shop and dine in the 49 promotes local businesses and challenges residents to do their business in the 49 square files of san francisco. we help san francisco remain unique, successful and right vi. so where will you shop and dine in the 49? >> i'm one of three owners here in san francisco and we provide mostly live music entertainment and we have food, the type of food that we have a mexican food and it's not a big menu, but we did it with love. like ribeye tacos and
quesadillas and fries. for latinos, it brings families together and if we can bring that family to your business, you're gold. tonight we have russelling for e community. >> we have a ten-person limb elimination match. we have a full-size ring with barside food and drink. we ended up getting wrestling here with puoillo del mar. we're hope og get families to join us. we've done a drag queen bingo and we're trying to be a diverse kind of club, trying different things. this is a great part of town and there's a bunch of shops, a variety of stores and ethnic
restaurants. there's a popular little shop that all of the kids like to hang out at. we have a great breakfast spot call brick fast at tiffanies. some of the older businesses are refurbished and newer businesses are coming in and it's exciting. >> we even have our own brewery for fdr, ferment, drink repeat. it's in the san francisco garden district and four beautiful murals. >> it's important to shop local because it's kind of like a circle of life, if you will. we hire local people. local people spend their money at our businesses and those local people will spend their money as well. i hope people shop locally.
[ ♪♪♪ ] >> roughly five years, i was working as a high school teacher, and i decided to take my students on a surfing field trip. the light bulb went off in my head, and i realized i could do much more for my students taking them surfing than i could as their classroom teacher, and that is when the idea for the city surf project was born. >> working with kids in the ocean that aren't familiar with this space is really special because you're dealing with a lot of fear and apprehension but at the same time, a lot of
excitement. >> when i first did it, i was, like, really scared, but then, i did it again, and i liked it. >> we'll get a group of kids who have just never been to the beach, are terrified of the idea, who don't like the beach. it's too cold out, and it's those kid that are impossible to get back out of the water at the end of the day. >> over the last few years, i think we've had at least 40 of our students participate in the city surf project. >> surfing helped me with, like, how to swim. >> we've start off with about two to four sessions in the pool before actually going out and surfing. >> swimming at the pool just helps us with, like, being, like, comfortable in the water and being calm and not being
all -- not being anxious. >> so when we started the city surf project, one of the things we did was to say hey, this is the way to earn your p.e. credits. just getting kids to go try it was one of our initial challenges for the first year or two. but now that we've been doing it three or four years, we have a group of kids that's consistent, and the word has spread, that it's super fun, that you learn about the ocean. >> starting in the morning, you know, i get the vehicles ready, and then, i get all the gear together, and then, i drive and go get the kids, and we take them to a local beach. >> we usually go to linda mar, and then occasionally ocean beach. we once did a special trip. we were in capitola last year, and it was really fun. >> we get in a circle and group
stretch, and we talk about specific safety for the day, and then, we go down to the water. >> once we go to the beach, i don't want to go home. i can't change my circumstances at home, but i can change the way i approach them. >> our program has definitely been a way for our students to find community and build friends. >> i don't really talk to friends, so i guess when i started doing city surf, i started to, like, get to know people more than i did before, and people that i didn't think i'd like, like, ended up being my best friends. >> it's a group sport the way we do it, and with, like, close camaraderie, but everybody's doing it for themselves. >> it's great, surfing around, finding new people and making new friendships with people throughout surfing. >> it can be highly developmental for students to
have this time where they can learn a lot about themselves while negotiating the waves. >> i feel significantly, like, calmer. it definitely helps if i'm, like, feeling really stressed or, like, feeling really anxious about surfing, and i go surfing, and then, i just feel, like, i'm going to be okay. >> it gives them resiliency skills and helps them build self-confidence. and with that, they can use that in other parts of their lives. >> i went to bring my family to the beach and tell them what i did. >> i saw kids open up in the ocean, and i got to see them connect with other students, and i got to see them fail, you know, and get up and get back on the board and experience success, and really enjoy themselves and make a
connection to nature at the same time. >> for some kids that are, like, resistant to, like, being in a mentorship program like this, it's they want to surf, and then later, they'll find out that they've, like, made this community connection. >> i think they provided level playing fields for kids to be themselves in an open environment. >> for kids to feel like i can go for it and take a chance that i might not have been willing to do on my own is really special. >> we go on 150 surf outings a year. that's year-round programming. we've seen a tremendous amount of youth face their fears through surfing, and that has translated to growth in other facets of their lives. >> i just think the biggest thing is, like, that they feel like that they have something that is really cool, that they're engaged in, and that
we, like, care about them and how they're doing, like, in general. >> what i like best is they really care about me, like, i'm not alone, and i have a group of people that i can go to, and, also, surfing is fun. >> we're creating surfers, and we're changing the face of surfing. >> the feeling is definitely akin to being on a roller coaster. it's definitely faster than i think you expect it to be, but it's definitely fun. >> it leaves you feeling really, really positive about what that kid's going to go out and do. >> i think it's really magical almost. at least it was for me. >> it was really exciting when i caught my first wave. >> i felt like i was, like -- it was, like, magical, really. >> when they catch that first wave, and their first lights
up, you know -- their face lights up, you know you have them hooked. >> i was on top of the world. it's amazing. i felt like i was on top of the world even though i was probably going two miles an hour. it was, like, the scariest thing i'd ever done, and i think it was when i got hooked on surfing after >> in august 2019 construction began on the new facility at 1995 evans avenue in bayview. it will house motorcycle police and department of forensic services division. both sfpd groups are in two buildings that need to be
vacated. they will join the new $183 million facility in late 2021. >> elements of the cfi and the traffic company are housed at the hall of justice, which has been determined to be seismically unfit. it is slated for demolition. in addition to that the forensic services crime lab is also slated for demolition. it was time and made sense to put these elements currently spread in different parts of the city together into a new facility. >> the project is located in the bayview area, in the area near estes creek. when san francisco was first formed and the streetcars were built back it was part of the bay. we had to move the building as close to the edge as possible on bedrock and solid elements piles
down to make sure it was secure. >> it will be approximately 100,000 square feet, that includes 8,000 square feet for traffic company parking garage. >> the reason we needed too new building, this is inadequate for the current staffing needs and also our motor department. the officers need more room, secured parking. so the csi unit location is at the hall of justice, and the crime laboratory is located at building 60 sixty old hunters point shipyard. >> not co-located doesn't allow for easy exchange of information to occur. >> traffic division was started in 1909. they were motor officers. they used sidecars. officers who road by themselves without the sidecar were called
solo. that is a common term for the motorcycle officers. we have 45 officers assigned to the motorcycles. all parking at the new facility will be in one location. the current locker room with shared with other officers. it is not assigned to just traffic companies. there are two showers downstairs and up. both are gym and shop weres are old. it needs constant maintenance. >> forensic services provides five major types of testing. we develop fingerprints on substances and comparisons. there are firearms identification to deal with projectiles, bullets or cartridge casings from shootings. dna is looking at a whole an rare of evidence from -- array
of evidence from dna to sexual assault to homicide. we are also in the business of doing breath allyzer analysis for dui cases. we are resurrecting the gunshot residue testing to look for the presence of gunshot residue. lifespan is 50 years. >> it has been raised up high enough that if the bay starts to rise that building will operate. the facility is versus sustainable. if the lead gold highest. the lighting is led. gives them good lights and reduces energy use way down. water throughout the project we have low water use facilities. gardens outside, same thing, low water use for that. other things we have are green
roofs on the project. we have studies to make sure we have maximum daylight to bring it into the building. >> the new facility will not be open to the public. there will be a lobby. there will be a deconstruction motorcycle and have parts around. >> the dna labs will have a vestibule before you go to the space you are making sure the air is clean, people are coming in and you are not contaminating anything in the labs. >> test firing in the building you are generating lead and chemicals. we want to quickly remove that from the individuals who are working in that environment and ensure what we put in the air is not toxic. there are scrubbers in the air to ensure any air coming out is also at the cleanest standards. >> you will see that kind of at
the site. it has three buildings on the site. one is for the motorcycle parking, main building and back behind is a smaller building for evidence vehicles. there is a crime, crime scene. they are put into the secure facility that locks the cars down while they are examined. >> they could be vehicles involved in the shooting. there might be projectiles lodged in the vehicle, cartridge casings inside the vehicle, it could be a vehicle where a aggravated sexual occurred and there might be biological evidence, fingerprints, recovered merchandise from a potential robbery or other things. >> the greatest challenge on the project is meeting the scope requirements of the project given the superheated construction market we have been facing. i am proud to say we are
delivering a project where we are on budget. >> the front plaza on the corner will be inviting to the public. something that gives back to the public. the building sits off the edge. it helps it be protected. >> what we are looking for is an updated building, with facilities to meet our unit's needs. >> working with the san francisco police department is an honor and privilege. i am looking forward to seeing their faces as the police officers move to the new facility. >> it is a welcome change, a new surrounding that is free from all of the challenges that we face with being remote, and then the ability to offer new expanded services to the city and police department investigations unit. i can't wait until fall of 2021 when the building is finally
>> good morning. welcome to the rules committee of the san francisco board of supervisors for today, monday, april 19th, '21. i'm joined by supervisor ahsha safai and supervisor chan. >> clerk: members will be participating in the meeting remotely. committee members will attend the meeting and participate in the meeting as if they were