and not about hillary clinton wins in nef nevavada la night. we're seeing a vote out on the democratic side. as we point out on twitter we don't know how many voted at the vatican on caucuses. >> the first thing, anyone that uses a caucus where they don't tell you about the raw votes is basically cheating the public. it's in iowa and nevada. to your point, i think the headline out of the democratic caucuses may be free fold. one, clinton's strength with the african american community, she won 3-1. second, there was a faint, a misleading entrance poll that showed bernie sanders winning. there may be something there. the most important part is turnout was down over a third in nevada over what it was in 2008 and bernie sanders entire argument is it's kind of the mirror ima mirr mirror error image of ted cruz's i'll bring out people who usually don't vote. one of the things we have to look at is bernie sanders message going to result in a huge increased turnout of low, usually low participation voters because if not, then what we have seen in nevad