with the keystone pipeline, the oil industry still wanted to get that over to tarzan's oil to market, they're trying to build a pipeline through iowa and that has united libertarians, environmentalists, landowners and farm owners. you would not hear any candidate mention of before. now bernie sanders is running advertisements about his opposition to it on the radio, a flyer, talking about it in every speech he gives. to me, it is encouraging to see at least one candidate on the democratic side and rand paul on the republican side have both come out against that issue. that tie so strongly not just into climate change and water quality, but also land rights. to think about how the government would have to approve eminent domain for private oil company and ordered to take the land needed, it is so wrong and it riles people up in the state. about 75% of iowans are against the use of him in a domain for that pipeline. i'm surprised more candidates have not come out against it. we have not heard a word from heller clinton about it, by the way. amy: that's got a break and then we will come

the keystone pipeline without eminent domain would not go 10 feet. you need eminent domain. and eminent domain is a good thing, not a bad thing. what a lot of people don't know because they're all saying, oh, you're one of take their property. when eminent domain is used on somebody's property, that person gets a fortune. they get at least fair market value. if there are smart, they will get two or three times the value of their property. without eminent domain, you don't have roads, highways, schools, bridges, or anything. so eminent domain -- it is not that i love it, but it is absolutely -- it is a necessity for a country. and certainly, it is a necessity for our country. >> so that is a yes on the northern -- difference between eminent domain for public purpose, as donald said, roads and infrastructure, pipe lines and all that, that is for public purpose. what donald did was use eminent domain to try to take the property of an elderly woman on the strip and atlantis city desk clinic city. that is downright wrong. here's the problem with that. the problem was, it was the

site and trying to stop that transfer on behalf of some of the apache nation, or alternatively, the keystone xl pipeline. he is been on the right side of history a lot of times. however, it is going to take more than just general omnibus sort of slush fund positions on behalf of bernie sanders or hillary clinton and order to of thea critical mass native vote. native people have been very clear that we want specific policy position, promises, and pledges on behalf of any of these candidates who are going to earn our vote. the early numbers to indicate that we have been supporting bernie sanders in iowa, a settlement was very much in favor of bernie according to the numbers at the caucus. moreover in nevada, the various tribes there were very much in favor of bernie sanders. however, the unveiling of either party's position platforms on native communities, bernie has unveiled as of this week at the national congress of american indian midyear conference, they unveiled a pretty detailed platform. that is cool, but we want to see what the implementation of those ideas are going to be from either