to the keystone pipeline and never waffled. he's also the only candidate to oppose fracking because fracking can endanger our drinking water and threaten our climate. sanders has the most far-reaching plan to fight climate change and build a clean energy future. bernie sanders -- people before polluters. sanders: i'm bernie sanders and i approve this message.

that's why sanders said no to the keystone pipeline and never waffled. he's also the only candidate to oppose fracking because fracking can endanger our drinking water and threaten our climate. sanders has the most far-reaching plan to fight climate change and build a clean energy future. bernie sanders -- people before polluters. sanders: i'm bernie sanders and i approve this message. >>> i am proud to be here to endorse donald trump for president of the united states. he'll provide strong, unequivocal leadership. he'll do what needs to be done to protect the american people, first and foremost. both in the homeland and in creating jobs for this country. and he'll make sure that people america keeps its word again. donald trump is someone who, when he makes a promise, he keeps it. >> and chris christie is here with us this morning. thank you for joining us, governor. you heard hugh hewitt read from the meg whitman statement. your national finance cochair. says that your endorsement of donald trump and astonishing display of political opportunism. donald

the keystone pipeline. everybody wants that. if you're a conservative, you want the keystone pipeline. they have a whole section of eminent domain. when they write up, the whole thing, on the keystone. they have a whole section. >> the crowd wasn't on your side. >> the crowd was on my side except they were all friends of mine that were donors and special interests and lobbyists. some of them worked for me in the past. actually, it was a very -- it shows how broken the system is. the people in that audience were the people that were supporting all of the candidates. i'm the only candidate not taking money. i'm not taking money. >> you had no supporters in the >> i had supporters. i had 20 tickets. they gave me 20 tickets. all of the people in the crowd, 90% of them were people that gave to the various candidates. and mostly to bush. bush got $128 million he's nowhere. he spent over $100 million on this failed campaign of his. he's nowhere. those people were in the audience. rubio said, he said, why does nobody get response but bu

the keystone pipeline. everybody wants that. if you're a conservative, you want the keystone pipeline. they have a whole section of eminent domain. they have a whole section. >> the crowd once on your side. >> the crowd was on my side except they were all friends of mine that were donors and special interests and lobbyists. some of them worked for me in the past. the people in that audience were the people that were supporting all of the candidates. i'm the only candidate not taking money. i'm not taking money. crowd? >> i had 20 tickets. they gave me 0 sixties. 90% of them were people that gave to the various candidates. and mostly to bush. bush got there are 128 million. he's nowhere. he's spent over there are 100 million on this failed campaign of his. he's nowhere. yins. rubio said, he said, why does nobody get response but bush? i just think it's really showing the system. when you have somebody like me, where i don't take money, where i'm a self-funder, people really appreciate that. that's why i brought it out last night.

vice president biden is not progressive because he supported keystone. senator shaheen is not progressive because she put -- she supports the trade tax. even the late great senator paul wellstone would not fit this definition because he voted for doma. we have differences. honestly, i think we should be talking about what we want to do for the country. but if we're going to get into labels, i don't think it was progressive to vote against the brady bill five times. [applause] ms. clinton: i don't think it was progressive to vote to give gun sellers immunity. it wasn't progressive to vote against ted kennedy's immigration reform. we can go back and forth like this. but the fact is, most people watching tonight want to know what we've done and what we will do. that is why i am laying out a specific agenda that will make progress, get more jobs with rising incomes, get us to universal health care coverage, get us to universal pre-k, paid family leave, and the other elements of what i think will build a strong economy that will it sure that americans keep ma

or keystone? >> i don't know, hillary has shown as ability to change just when you think she can't. but i think we're ignoring her in terms of she's the other big story of the night. yes, iowa was in some ways friendly terrain for bernie sanders, but it's been said a million times and can't be said often enough, bernie sanders is a 74-year-old self-proclaimed socialist little known outside of new england until six months ago and the former first lady, secretary of state, senator from new york, one ofo the most iconic women in america. >> rose: the niesms said one of the most experienced persons to runoffs. >> this was a very bad night for her because she comes out looking weak. she's going to get the democratic nomination, but what does this say about the capt. the democrats are sending into the general election. >> rose: susan? her speech was going to be known as the breathing the sigh of relief speech, and that is not exactly a positive message of sort of change and accomplishment. i am struck by the fact that both parties do seem to be in an anti-mode and that competes against ou

if you're going to do that, you don't give one second's thought to supporting the keystone pipeline, which is excavating and transporting some of the dirtiest fossil fuel on earth. i opposed that from the beginning. charlie: and she? bernie: she finally came around and i'm glad. now she's in opposition to the keystone pipeline in terms of wall street, you're looking at a guy who helped lead the opposition to the deregulation of wall street. wall street spent $5 billion over a 10-year period to tell us what a great idea it would be if commercial banks and investor banks and large insurance companies would merge. i never believed it and i believed that we need to break up these large financial institutions. i'm glad that over a period of time hillary clinton has come up with some ideas about how you deal with wall street but frankly they don't go as far as they should. when you have banks with such economic and political power. the six largest financial institutions with the equivalency of 60% of the g.d.p. in my view, they ought to be broken up. charlie: anything else that she ought t