scholarships for local students. marshall are the tampa bay rays and her with more want to welcome mr. bill walsh is a vice president of strategy and develop met we also want to welcome the chairman of the parade. thank you for coming. you said earlier this is a great fit for the race and crew >> thank you for having us. our mission at the raise is to have the committed to the magic of baseball. most people are familiar with those magical moments it happened on the field. there are many years a lot of many of happens off the field as well. we're excited about this partnership in particular talk about our partnership with big brothers and big sisters >> you have them on the float with you. and the players. >> people from the raise organization have a special connection with big brothers big sisters. what is that? >> our partnership has going on 10 years now. employees currently community. it's per slice of the near and dear to my heart. i've been a big for four years. they are timid this forward to the opportunity to help tell their story. >> even working extra hard to bring the focus

mr. bill walsh is the senior vice president of strategy and development and luis campanello, chirm chairman of the parade. thank you for coming. you have a special guest coming? >> first, thank you for having us on the program and thank you so much to the crew of santiago. our mission to enier skies the baseball. and people are familiar with magic on the field but there's a lot of magic off the field as partnerships. we're excited about the particular, -- opportunity to talk about in particular the big brothers and big sisters. >> they will be on the float with you along with the players. special connection with big brothers big sisters. what is it exactly? >> we have -- our partnership with big brothers big sisters is going on 10 years now and we currently volunteering as bigs in the community, personal it's something near and dear to my years. they are a tremendous organization. >> you have been working extra hard to bring the focus back to community and the parade. what are the specifi

have you, mr. kadsick? >> no, sir. >> how but, mrs. fridayfelt? >> no. >> ms. walsh? >> no, sir. >> mr. higgins? >> i can think of one occasion of which i have accidentally removed material from the skiff and immediately put it back to the skiff. >> you didn't take it home? >> no, sir. >> mr. samuel? >> no, sir. >> mr. seoul? microphone please. >> sir, i took one home and the document was destroyed. >> so in two instances where you accidentally did something and you showed due diligence, took care of the situation. you did what you should have done and you reported it to your superior. that's not what happened here. so my problem with this is that, again, that i think this committee has a responsibility. i think the chairman's articulated that quite well. so exercise the oversight the constitution invests us with. and that we need to look into the possibilities of how a secretary of state acting, handling classified information, with extreme carelessness may have compromised agents in the field, possibly national security. there is a number of issues here and it begs

walsh respects the office but does not respect the president. >> i don't think -- number one, he used the word war. okay? i don't think it was appropriate at the time to say we're in a war. yeah, we may be in a war. we're in a sense of there is a war between two different communities. but we've been in a war. there has been this disconnect. but nobody wants to have the conversation. neither party wants to have that conversation. both of them have contributed -- i'm a conservative. i think my party has some fault. but i also think there's a lot of progressive and liberals have some fault as well. >> and i want to talk about the reactions we're hearing from the two presumptive nominees. we've heard from hill cy clinton. we've heard from donald trump. your thoughts on what we heard so far. >> i don't think either one of them have helped the situation, especially when i look at hillary clinton. part of my problem with secretary clinton is that she talks about an injustice system when she is one of those well-connected people that has benefited from the justice system. someone that have de

mr. higgins? how about you? mr. higgins: no, we have not. >> ms. walsh? knowledge.not to my >> mr. samuel question mr. samuel: no mr. chairman. >> mr. -- >> no. not to my knowledge. >> can you release these documents the public, and of so what would happen? what happens if we release these e-mails on hillary clinton's server? what happens? confirmhairman, i can the they made a classification with due process and i would be happy to provide. we do not feel it is appropriate for public. >> do these materials include sources invested? >> mr. chairman, i would prefer to discuss matters regarding classification in closed session. >> the gentlewoman's time is expired. forve for -- thank you yielding. >> i reclaim my time. you took all my time. i think the chairman can of all the time he wants. i just ask for a second that our committee is engaged in a is nothing but a partisan attack on sec. clinton. in effort to harm or undermine her presidential campaign. that is all it is. get the chairman of the intelligence committee to release the documents to you. no one is withholding it. hasinte

marty walsh joining us this morning. mr. mayor heading to washington ahead of the announcement. first of all, good morning, tell us how this came about and to be there in person with the president this morning. >> we were asked to take part of this that the president is having today and know the work done in boston and boston police department done and getting guns off the street the last two years and town halls and discussions we have had around shootings in the city, so i'm here today to support the president in efforts and you already mentioned this, unlicensed gun dealers get licenses to conduct the business and background checks on potential buyers and also require federally licensed gun dealers to report any lost or many of the guns we see in the streets that are causing crime or in death in a lot of cases are legal handguns. >> sara: marty, sara underwood here. it is not going to solve every murder or mass shooting but why do you believe so strongly this will work. >> it is a piece of the puzzle. not answer to it all and another little piece we have, look at what's going

and that business owner there, mr. walsh, says he'll be sharing that video on social media in the hopes that and calls police. >> jason: allegations of racism at pinkerton academy could face disciplinary action this weekend. showing teens in black face dressed in confederate flags some found it offensive others say the paint is part of spirit week celebration, where wearing school face paint is part of the tradition. >> that's not reaching out other day, it was just a different color. >> jason: the school told fox 25 they don't tolerate any form of discrimination. >> heather: all varsity and junior varsity in plymouth football games were cancelled this defend and the parents are to blame. they decided to for fit the games because of inappropriate behavior at a parents gathering for players. they're not saying what the are not involved. plymouth was scheduled to play hanover both nights. >>> and a field trip for a group of new hampshire sixth graders had to be cut short because of bed bugs. those bed bugs found at a cam

brief mr. chairman, ricky member cummings, my name is deirdre walsh. james hopper.tor i'm here in response to the request and answer questions by the fbi to congress relating to former secretary clinton's e-mail. with regard to these documents, my staff used the icg separate from my office. accordingly, i cannot speak on committee.he with regard to the documents and subject of this hearing, og and i was not involved. i can answer questions you may have. i am joined by mike colleagues from the central intelligence agency and the national security agency in response to the committee request. even the classification of the underlining material, we look forward to discussing sensitive matters in the closed portion of the hearing. >> thank you, it is my walsh'snding that ms. statement reflect the icy eyes. -- mr. hering, which information to believe the congress does not have the right to see? >> what does congress not have the right to see? there is more to it in a simple answer i think each case is specific to its own set of facts i think director call me

mr. higgins, how about you? >> no, we have not. >> there's no redactions. ms. walsh? >> not to my knowledge. >> mr. samuel? >> no, mr. chairman. not to my knowledge. >> no, not to my knowledge. >> can you release these e-mails into the public and if so, what would happen? mr. higgins, what happens if we release these e-mails that are -- on hillary clinton's unsecured server? what happens? >> mr. chairman, i can confirm that cia participated in a classification review process, and i would be happy to talk about that process in closed session. some of the materials contain classified materials that is not appropriate for public release. >> do some of these materials include sources and methods? >> mr. chairman, i'd prefer to discuss any further matters relating to classification in closed session. >> gentlewoman's time is expired, but thank you so much for yielding to me. >> i get to close in my time. you took all my time. i think the chairman can have all the time he wants. i just ask for a second, just a second. what our committee is engaged in is something but a part

walsh's statements reflect -- okay. recognize myself for set of questions. >>> mr. herring, what information do you believe that congress does not have the right to see? >> so we believe it is important for oversight committees to understand how the fbi reached our conclusion. >> no, no, no, no, no. wait. i'm asking you a philosophical question. what does congress not have the right to see? >> so i don't know that i can answer that in a way that -- there is more to it than a simple answer. i think each case is sort of specific to its own set of facts. i think we tried to be, i think director comey tried to be as transparent as he could with this committee and other committees as he can be. so i think when he spoke and answered questions. >> what as i as a member of congress, what is it that you believe we don't have the right to see? ? see, this is the way our government works. we get to do oversight. that's why since 1814, this committee has been doing that. there is executive -- let me help you. there is executive privilege. has the president invoked executive pri

. >> i recognize mr. walsh for five minutes. >> thank you very much. i want to thank each of you for the work you and your departments do. it's astonishing times when the kind of crimes that all america is exposed to are happening and the expectation on the part of the public is somehow someway you're going to make it right and make us safe. so i think all of us really appreciate your work. this issue as you've acknowledged is very difficult. if any of us were in your position what we would want is access to any information that the fourth amendment allowed us to get in order for us to do our job. but there's three issues that are really difficult. one is law enforcement issue that you've very clearly enunciated. you have probable cause, you go through the process of getting a warrant. you're entitled to information that's on the phone or in the house. because of the technology we have impediments. i think we want you to be able to get the information you rightfully can obtain. the second issue that makes it unique almost is that in order for you to ge

have you, mr. kadsick? >> no, sir. >> how but, mrs. fridayfelt? >> no. >> ms. walsh? >> no, sir. >> mr. higgins? >> i can think of one occasion of which i have accidentally removed material from the skiff and immediately put it back to the skiff. >> you didn't take it home? >> no, sir. >> mr. samuel? >> no, sir. >> mr. seoul? microphone please. >> sir, i took one home and the document was destroyed. >> so in two instances where you accidentally did something and you showed due diligence, took care of the situation. you did what you should have done and you reported it to your superior. that's not what happened here. so my problem with this is that, again, that i think this committee has a responsibility. i think the chairman's articulated that quite well. so exercise the oversight the constitution invests us with. and that we need to look into the possibilities of how a secretary of state acting, handling classified information, with extreme carelessness may have compromised agents in the field, possibly national security. there is a number of issues here and it begs

walsh's statements reflect -- ok. recognize myself for set of questions. mr. herring, what information do you believe that congress does not have the right to see? >> so we believe it is important for oversight committees to understand how the fbi reached our conclusion. >> no, no, no, no, no. wait. i'm asking you a philosophical question. what does congress not have the right to see? >> so i don't know that i can answer that in a way that -- there is more to it than a simple answer. i think each case is sort of specific to its own set of facts. i think we tried to be, i think director comey tried to be as transparent as he could with this committee and other committees as he can be. so i think when he spoke and answered questions. >> what as i as a member of congress, what is it that you believe we don't have the right to see?see, this is the way our government works. we get to do oversight. that's why since 1814, this committee has been doing that. there is executive -- let me help you. there is executive privilege. has the president invoked executive privil

i must say when that mr. walsh came out with some indictments -- >> on the friday before. >> of fryberger friday before the election, brought by his aide, who was a big donor to the democratic party and a big democratic operative on the west coast, brings the indictment against weinberger and, heck, i talk about we're changing, the polls are closing, cnn has us only four points back or eight points back, and all these reporters want to talk about is the new indictment and whether that made me look like i hadn't told the truth, which i had told all along. you talk about a politically timed indictment, not blaming anybody, but that was a cruel blow. >> a president, a powerful person, talking about that because it was so close to the election. >> absolutely, which is why you see this clinton campaign sending an army of surrogates out today pushing this idea of release more information, which is safe for them to say because realistically it takes weeks to review this kind of e-mail -- >> do you think they're bein

i yield back, mr. chairman. >> recognize mr. walsh for five minutes. >> thank you very much. i want to thank each of you for the work you and your departments do. it's astonishing times when the kind of crimes that all america is exposed to are happening and the expectation on the part of the public is somehow someway you're going to make it right and make us safe. so i think all of us really appreciate your work. this issue as you've acknowledged is very difficult. if any of us were in your position what we would want is access to any information that the fourth amendment allowed us to get in order for us to do our job. but there's three issues that are really difficult. one is law enforcement issue that you've very clearly annunciated. you have probable cause, you go through the process of getting a warrant. you're entitled to information that's on the phone or in the house. because of the technology we have impediments. i think we want you to be able to get the information you rightfully can obtain. the second issue that makes it unique almost is that in order for you to g

i must say when that mr. walsh came out with some indictments of -- >> of weinberger on the friday before. >> friday before the election, brought by his aide who was a big donor to the democratic party and a big democratic operative on the west coast, brings the indictment against weinberger and, heck, i'd talk about we're changing, the polls are closing, cnn has us only four points back or eight points back. and all these reporters want to talk about is the new indictment and whether that made me look like i hadn't told the truth, which i had told all along. but, you know, you talk about a politically timed indictment. and i didn't say it then. don't blame somebody else, just get on about your business, but that was a cruel blow. >> a cruel blow. that cap weinberger indictment was the late october surprise in the 1992 election. legally in the end turned out to be nothing. it was gone before christmas. but not before its political impact was felt on election day. at least that's how the guy who lost that elec

mr. chairman. we are all here with a heavy heart and some growing anger with the process that is going on here in the congress. as i've said before and i'll say it again, we need to adopt gun violence prevention legislation to expand background checks to all gun purchases and we need to reinstate a ban on the sale of military style assault weapons. at the same time, i also believe we need to take a comprehensive approach at adjusting the issue of building and strengthening trust between local police and their communities. i've dedicated a lot of my time in congress to policing issues, to gun violence prevention, introducing legislation, town hall meetings across the country and meeting with grieving families of both citizens involved of fallen officers alike. there's a part of the controversial 1994 crime bill, i was able to pass the federal pattern in practice enforcement provision that allowed the department of justice to investigate state and local police departments most recently like