johnson. not only for having ordered the presumptions of the raids against the north that rather persisting with an intervention that for which there is nothing to be helped. the vietnamese alone been qualified to solve their problems. there is one -- >> that story is highly inaccurate. it is not my privilege to prove my statement by putting president degaulle's letter into public record. that story bears no resemblance to the letter i have seen. >> the last paragraph says, my degaulle says my analysis is different from that of your leaders. this war is absurd. it is leading to nothing. but i know the responsibilities of anyone at the head of a great state. i can understand president johnson's problems of conscience. i said the post is only sometimes accurate. the third question, vice president kennedy. i mean humphrey, i'm sorry. vice president humphrey who is traveling into a number of countries. the paper also this morning said he made an authorized loan i believe of $100 million. i am not

his reply to mr. johnson says that the goal is beyond reproach , "not only for having rigged the results against the north, but also in assisting in an intervention. the vietnamese alone are qualified to find a resolution to their problems." chairman, that story is highly inaccurate -- chairman: well, that is what i wanted to know. sec. rusk: it is not my privilege to prove my statement 's putting president de gaulle letter in the paper here. that story doesn't bear any resemblance to the letter that i have seen. chairman: the last paragraph with"that an american met mr. degaulle a short time ago" and "this war is absurd, it is leading to nothing, but i know the responsibilities of anyone at the head of great state. i can imagine and i can understand president johnson's problem." i wanted to know, is it inaccurate and untrue? sec. rusk: it is inaccurate and it is untrue. chairman: what about the third vice president kennedy, i mean humphrey, i am sorry. vice president humphrey who is traveling into a