it there's another theory, remember they made the switch, ronald reagan a lot of people believe that jim baker was still chief of staff instead of ronald reagan. >> well that is another possibility and i don't know why he would want to be chief of staff so that. i know nancy did not like it. >> will i think her judgment was pretty correct printed. >> while he would say things like will not here into leaders or whatever countries, it would be right in the middle. but we always well she always like ronald ragan for some reason he doublecrossed us on the budget and i remember i think i told you this before that he came up with an exit with was champagne and chocolates and all of the stuff into the office. >> what was your first impression of bill clinton in the white house printed because a stories about you going down there more the story says that about the donuts. it. >> as first meeting coming in donuts at his place. it's always the donuts. the next meeting we had donuts in every meeting after that we had donuts grade at fatty very charming guy. i helped him out on nafta which i'm n

if ronald reagan. lot of people who believe if jim baker was still chief of staff instead of ronald reagan. the iran con ra never happened. >> oh, that's a possibility. -- >> he was always kind of leaning over the president like i'm right here. two leaders of the -- whatever countries, he's right in the middle. but, you know, we always got -- sheila always liked don regan for some reason. and he double crossed us on the budget. i think i told you this before. came up the next day with champagne and chocolates and all this stuff. >> what was your first impression of bill clinton in the white house? because these stories about you going down there and one of the stories is what? about the doughnuts? or. >> yeah. first meeting. you don't even have doughnuts in this place. always doughnuts republican. next meeting we had doughnuts. had'em every meeting after that. i thought he was a very charming guy. and i helped him out on nafta. which i'm not sure i look back on it and they were supposed to help me out

reagan. but at the heart of this was the senses a moralism outside new traditions outside as jimmy carter might have put it in during american values. the unfortunate outcome as i think many moderate analysts of nixon's presidency might say is the throw into deep disrepute any reasonable sense of limits and interests might have served the united states well at many points across american history. the real tragedy to put it differently of the hate surrounding nixon may be the sheer difficult sense of resurrecting fundamentally sound policy ideas that sat at core of nixon's presidency. so encrusted those ideas have become and the reputation of the 22nd president. i'll stop there there and turn it back to you. needless to say we never have as much time for discussion as we want. going to start us out with what i call a semi- speed around. feel free to answer if you think it's pertinent after that i've got a couple present questions for speed around. this first section is a volunteer if you will.

ronald reagan covered california. one of the most strongest pro-choice legislation to the country. george h. w. bush, the first bush strongly pro-choice. and the candidate is the same. by the 1980s some people that will become passionately a postabortion, what happened in awakening? , something very simple. chief republican strategist they recognize that they pretend, i stress pretend, to be antiabortion they pick up the evangelical, huge that to the united states. and furthermore it can be a cover for racism. a lot of this started because southern racist, when schools had to be opened up they started segregating religious groups with government funding. the court stepped in and said that's in violation of the law. here is a way to get your segregated racist schools without further leading the law. schools that took christian values like abortion. we are not racist. except we are of course. the change from the 70s to the 80s. one aspect of the liberal program. an essential aspect. if you are going to get people to accept to a liberal assault, you have to shift attention away from e

ronald reagan had a different view. he said if we invested in our military, if we marshaled the power of our economy to defend freedom and strengthen the arsenal of democracy, the soviet union would collapse. ronald reagan essentially set into motion and american posture that ended the cold war. we won it and the soviet union is on the ash heap of history. i think standing up to soviet communism and calling it out as the evil empire as you did was a contribution that will be remembered for the ages. i could not be more proud under our administration. we changed the national consensus on china. people know that the communist chinese party represses its own people, subjugates minorities, particularly muslim and christian. it's a precious -- it suppresses free speech and engages in the action that interns of -- in terms of intellectual property theft and abuses, america has looked the other way on. we took a strong stand against china. the current administration has not changed that posture. president trump knew what he wa

ronald reagan had a different view. he said that if we invested in our military, if we essentially martial the power of our economy to defend freedom and strengthen the arsenal of democracy, that the soviet union would collapse. while it would happen a few years after he left office, ronald reagan essentially set into motion an american posture that ended the cold war. we won it and the soviet union is on the ash heap of history. i think that standing up to soviet communism, calling out the soviet union as the evil empire, as he did, was a contribution that will be remembered for the ages. i think it also echoes a bit for our time now. i couldn't be more proud that under our administration we change the national consensus on china. people now know that the chinese communist party repressors its own people, subjugate minority populations, particularly muslim uyghurs and christians. and engages in the kind of action that in terms of intellectual property, theft and trade abuses, that america had looked the other way on. w

he did is ronald reagan imitating doing ronald reagan. [laughter] will yes, tear down the wall. that is how it happened folks. i will tell you everybody in the foreign policy committee try to get that line out. we thought like hell for it. we went through a lot of revisions that came out a bunch of times and we got it back in. >> it was the best moment. >> is an ugly memo about me in the file to saying we have had five impassioned conversations he refuses to step back et cetera. but the wonderful part about it, and reagan worked it over as he would it was very much him. in the final analysis that was the nature of ronald reagan. everyone wanted out hotel i wrote this in the wall street journal if anyone is interested for little words it tells the story the morning of the speech got a cable from the state department, tom and risk and gave it to me as director of communication. it's a tom is out i think it is? said yes to pay any attention to its another last-minute plea the walls going to be their last another 20 years. everyone brought it to regulars ultimately his decision. as

staying with ronald reagan for a moment. this is a story told to me by your predecessor the first national security advisor the year is 1977 now reagan is a former governor he just lost the nomination to gerald ford. he is playing close it tension and take our breaks him on world affairs and reagan said would you like to hear mike. the cold war? he said of course, governor than ronald reagan did put this down in writing and quoting from him, this is reagan speaking some people think i'm simplistic but there is a difference between being simple and being simplistic might. about the cold war is that we went and they lose. how do you operationalize that? here is richard nixon and dÉtente and then warning against an ordinance fear of communism and then turned it upside down. now that i'm older field a little risky to me. >> i am a big fan of the approach obviously with radio free europe i think that moral clarity of reagan is incredibly essential upon hearing and ultimately they are fearful of their citizens. and when they real

my kids, you work for ronald reagan. that is so cool. but his stature keeps going up. you notice that? overtime,'s keeps going up. and i think the last thing i'll say is i went out to south dakota 3 weeks ago, rapid city, brown mount rushmore. there is room for one more. [laughs] wouldn't it be amazing if we could put ronald reagan on that? [applause] >> judy shelton, last word? >> i think he proved you really can change the world. you can change the destiny of the world for the good. for me, the 80s started with the privilege of getting to hear about the reagan program from martin anderson and the people who created it. then see that, the consequences of that. juxtapose against my study of the internal monetary and economic systems of the soviet union. who of course still had the capacity for thermal nuclear exchange to destroy everything. what you everything. what you saw was the combination of vision and fortitude was able to bring down that nation. i remember when i see john sitting there i don't know if he remembers

ronald reagan. that's why regan knew that from his countless hours with gorbachev at the geneva summit, the reykjavik summit, letters, phone calls, he had a sense of this guy gorbachev. that i can push him further. i can put that demand into tear down that wall. and it wasn't going to cause a complete rupture in the entire relationship. it was going to cause the cold war to turn violent. so he had a sense from spending so much time gorbachev, more than all of the people at the state department rcep, of that balance of pushing this guy but also stretching a hand out. so, i think when you look at gorbachev's role in the peaceful ending of the cold war, a lot of it was facilitated by regan knowing him while. and that helped create the circumstances of november of 1989 for the german people to raise. up >> will, i don't know how to do this in a zoom call, but i'd like to lean forward and kiss right on the forehead. i'm worried about this for 34 years. >> i'll give you a hug back. >> of course, you're ri

we continue our look back at the reagan administration with a conversation about president ronald reagan's tax cuts and economic plan. >> it's my pleasure to welcome everyone to today's event. a celebration of the 40 year anniversary of reagan tax cuts. we're very excited to be hosting this event, this celebration. the economic recovery tax act is a positive change in tax policy, yes. but it represented much more than that. it was a change in the mind-set. the 1970s were a time of high inflation, high unemployment, low on opportunity. our nation's leaders rejected the idea of american greatness and thought the american dream was behind us. 30 years ago the heritage foundation hosted a celebration for the 10th anniversary of the tax cuts. it was entitled the importance of america's victory over washington. think about that for a second. america's victory over washington. as the tax cuts were being debated in congress, president reagan gave voice to this sentiment in his televised address reassuring the american people, quote, all the lobbying, the organized demonstrations and the cries of p

ronald reagan. i would not have written that for anybody else and i can tell you that because i had worked for then vice president george h.w. bush. would never have written it for him. reagan alone with his insistence on delivering the speech once he had seen it over other objections, george bush in every foreign policy speech, the first question he would always ask me when i drafted a foreign policy speech, has state approved of this? so listen to this story. all three of you but jamie next. we'll stay with ronald reagan for a moment. this is a story, i think quite a famous story told to me by dig allen who was your predecessor, ronald reagan's first national security adviser. the year is 1977. reagan is now a former governor and has just lost the republican presidential nomination to gerald ford. there is no inkling he is going to run for president. he is paying close attention to world affairs and dig allen stops by his house in pacific palisades and briefs him on world affairs. then reagan said

>> i think that ronald reagan honored the independent judgment. it's true that volker had come in under carter in '79. he was there until august '87. but we had the 1981 goal commissisisisisi i think that volker understood that people were so concerned about the lax policies of his predecessor and arthur burns and whether there was some kind of acquiescence to what the white house might want that president reagan was very respectful. but it turned out that it's what he thought he had to do to wrench out inflation, and it happened to be exactly what mundell said we ought to be doing in order to have the tax policies expand economic output. >> and the combination of low tax rates and sound money, to me, is the most important lesson to be learned. so, look, i was a young kid there in omb. i did sit in on one of those volker meetings -- thank you to mr. meese, by the way, who would include me. reagan and volker had something in common. goals. goals. volker was defeated when nixon went through what he went through in the early '70s. volker was secretar

ronald reagan. i would not have written that for anybody else. i can tell you that because i had worked for then vice president george h.w. bush. would never have written it for him. reagan alone and reagan alone would have insisted on delivering the speech, once he had seen it over other objections. george bush in every foreign policy speech, the first question he would always ask me when i drafted a foreign policy speech, has state approved of this? that was the first question. listen to this story, all three of you. jamie, next. stay with ronald reagan here for a moment. this is a story -- it was told to me by dick allen, your predecessor, ronald reagan's first national security advisor. 1977. reagan is a former governor. he has lost the republican presidential nomination to gerald ford. there's no inkling he will run for president. he is paying attention to world affairs. dick stops by his house and briefs him on world affairs. then reagan said, would you like to hear my theory of the cold war?

reagan, and another republican, and a conservative republican governor of california started the zev program, the zero emissions vehicle program which i have been intimately involved with auto manufacturers and also to a degree with other regulations with the heavy duty manufacturers. i have been in at funerals of constituents of mine who have died while working in these refineries. i don't know if you have been in any of those. five of them died. one of them died because the company, not yours, but somebody who's still -- a company that competes with you was appealing a citation from cal osha to replace walky talkies that cost less than a thousand dollars. michael landsman who was trying to use that to tell the folks back in the command unit that they should shut down the hydro cracker, they couldn't hear him in time because so he was eviscerated. that's a long way of saying i have a long history in this field. you provide value, but it's time to change. and we don't have time from an economic standpoint or an environmental standpoint to haggle over this, but we've got to remember h

reagan, and another republican, and a conservative republican governor of california started the zev program, the zero emissions vehicle program which i have been intimately involved with auto manufacturers and also to a degree with other regulations with the heavy duty manufacturers. i have been in at funerals of constituents of mine who have died while working in these refineries. i don't know if you have been in any of those. five of them died. one of them died because the company, not yours, but somebody who's still -- a company that competes with you was appealing a citation from cal osha to replace walky talkies that cost less than a thousand dollars. michael landsman who was trying to use that to tell the folks back in the command unit that they should shut down the hydro cracker, they couldn't hear him in time because so he was eviscerated. that's a long way of saying i have a long history in this field. you provide value, but it's time to change. and we don't have time from an economic standpoint or an environmental standpoint to haggle over this, but we've got to remember h

ronald reagan amended it, another republican. and george dukmejian, another conservative republican governor of california, started the zero emissions vehicles program, which i have been intimately involved with, with auto manufacturers and also just a degree with other regulations on the heavy duty manufacturerers. i've been at funerals of constituents of mine who died while working in these refineries. i don't know if any of you have ever been at one of those. five of them died. one of them died because the company, not yours, but somebody who is still -- a company that competes with you, was appealing a citation from cal osha to replace walkie-talkies that cost less than a thousand dollars. michael landsman was trying to use those to tell folks to shut down the firecracker, they couldn't hear him, so he was eviscerated. that's a long way of saying i have a long history in this field. you provide value. but it's time to change. and we don't have time from an economic standpoint or environmental standpoint. but we've got to reme

ronald reagan amended it, another republican. and george dukmejian, another republican, started the vehicles program which i have been intimately involved with, with regulations on heavy duty manufacturers. i've been at funerals of constituents of mine who died while working in these refineries. i don't know if any of you have ever been at one of those. five of them died. one of them died because the company, not yours, but somebody who is still -- a company that competes with you, was appealing a citation from cal osha to replace walkie-talkies that cost less than a thousand dollars. michael landsman was trying to use those to tell folks to shut down the firecracker, they couldn't hear him, so he was eviscerated. that's a long way of saying there's a long history in this field. you provide value. but it's time to change. and we don't have time from an economic standpoint or environmental standpoint. but we've got to remember history and we've got to rebuild trust. mr. sommers, the viewpoint that all of this innovation and our re

ronald reagan said we can have peace, we can have tomorrow. we may not have peace anymore. gentleman faster, i did read your book. i recommend it. but first i want to ask you a couple of things. you discuss the area of corruption. i want to ask you about the taliban but particularly the former afghan government, where a lot of our endless war friends come down to say corrupt, not worth it. can you talk about the role of corruption and how we could have done better? >> thank you for this opportunity. i commanded an anti corruption unit task force for two years. once we realized it was a fatal threat to the state it was too little, too late. and many recommendations did not make it past washington d.c., because we continue to try to turn a blind eye. but it's also poorly understood, where the corruption came from. it came from a short term approach to long term problems in afghanistan. we kept telling the afghans, we are leaving, okay we are leaving, now we are really leaving. so the afghans were like, who has our back, nobody. what did we do about the civil war? we fill up o

there was no ronald reagan scholarship available. they made outlandish claims based on where she grew up. they say she believes the soviet economic system was superior to ours. they accuse her of wanting to establish communism rule over banking. false. "the wall street journal" neglected to mention she became an american. they neglected to mention she started her family here. they neglected to mention the deep ties she has to american universities where she studied and worked. they neglected to mention her patriotic service to our chosen country, the united states department of treasury under president george w. bush. escaping communist, moving to america for a better life, embracing american values, hard work and public service, what could be more american than that? the ranking member piled on. he requested the professor supply the committee with a paper that she had to write as an undergraduate. to be clear, this committee never requires anyone to submit unpublished, undergraduate work. i don't remember any nominee who faced a sim

reagan said it best the nation that cannot control its borders. >> i want to be clear i will discuss border security in the us border patrol forces immigration law and it is not simply an immigration and agency in the traditional use of the term and to ensure that anyone or anything entering this country does so legally and as i addressed in the house leadership dated september 11 i am extremely concerned by the avoidable and rapid disintegration in the history of a nation. and with the transnational criminal organization by border patrol by the criminals and terrorists and those that can be developed over decades of those experienced career professionals i fully understand after working for multiple administrations the political to prioritize differently however i am extremely concerned a selective information that they are at best misleading and then to withhold completely and then to provide any transparency with the threats that are crossing the border and heading to your stay and your city and town. these threats just stay at the border. in my professional opinion the highly pub

reagan said it best the nation that cannot control its borders. >> i want to be clear i will discuss border security in the us border patrol forces immigration law and it is not simply an immigration and agency in the traditional use of the term and to ensure that anyone or anything entering this country does so legally and as i addressed in the house leadership dated september 11 i am extremely concerned by the avoidable and rapid disintegration in the history of a nation. and with the transnational criminal organization by border patrol by the criminals and terrorists and those that can be developed over decades of those experienced career professionals i fully understand after working for multiple administrations the political to prioritize differently however i am extremely concerned a selective information that they are at best misleading and then to withhold completely and then to provide any transparency with the threats that are crossing the border and heading to your stay and your city and town. these threats just stay at the border. in my professional opinion the highly pub

ronald reagan said it best, better than i ever could. a nation that cannot control its borders is not a nation. >> thank you. >> again, thank you for the time today. i want to be clear, i'm here to discuss border security and its implications on national security. u.s. border patrol is a federal law enforcement agency that is charged with securing our international borders. u.s. border patrol enforces up immigration law and will continue to do so to secure the borders, but u.s. border patrol is not simply an immigration agency in the traditional use of the term. in its simplest terms u.s. border patrol is charged with ensuring that anyone or anything entering this country does so legally through a designated port of entry which is the equivalent of our nation's front door. as i addressed in my letter to the senate and the house leadership dated september 11th, 2021, i'm extremely concerned by the avoidable and rapid disintegration of what was arguably the most effective border security in the history of our nation. beyond a very visible

i'm here today because i work for six presidents starting with ronald reagan. i respect every president i've ever worked for, even if i disagreed on their immigration perspective because they're the president of the united states. let this be clear, president trump did more to secure our border than any president in my lifetime. that's a fact. illegal immigration down 83%. how many women didn't get raped when immigration is down 83%? how many children didn't die when immigration is down 83%? how much children didn't die of fentanyl overdoses that were smuggled across the border. i argue president trump's policies saved lives. they're successful policies. i respect every president i ever work for. and as hard for me as it is to say, we now have a president -- the first president in my lifetime that came into office and intentionally unsecured the border. incredible. the secretary of homeland security is right there shoulder to shoulder with him. a secretary of homeland security who has not taken one step to slow the flow. the president of the united states came

ronald reagan said it better than i ever could. a nation that cannot control its borders is not a nation. >> thank you. >> again, thank you for the time today. i want to be clear, i'm here to discuss border security and its implications on national security. u.s. border patrol is a federal law enforcement agency that is charged with securing our international borders. u.s. border patrol enforces up graduation law and will continue to do so to secure the borders but u.s. border patrol is not simply an immigration agency in the traditional use of the term. in its simplest terms u.s. border patrol is charged with ensuring that anyone or anything entering this country does so legally through a designated port of entry which is the equivalent of our nation's front door. as i addressed in my letter to the senate and the house leadership dated september 11th, 2021, i'm extremely concerned by the avoidable and rapid disintegration of what was arguably the most effective border security in the history of our nation. beyond a very visible ma

reagan and george w. bush era. and it's the also why you see that happening, to some extent the, with hispanic voters. this was the big shock for a lot of democrats in 2020, that trump was able to win a bunch of hispanic voters. but, in fact, there are a lot of hispanic voters who are culturally conservative in various ways who are economically moderate, will not vote for a rigidly -- republican party. we're residing over a pretty good economy pre-covid. trump was willing, in the end, to spend a bunch of money on covid relief. and, you know, the republican party was basically moderate enough on economics to get more culturally conservative latinos and do better in florida and texas than democrats expected. so anyway, there's a lot more to be said, but that's a somewhat condensed attempt to describe the dynamic that necessary in play. -- that's in play. >> host: jim in caliente, california, you're on with author ross ross douthat. >> caller: thank you very much for taking my call. i live in an area which i

. >> possibility. >> i don't know why ronald reagan wanted to be chief of staff so badly. i know nancy didn't like it. >> i think her judgment was proven pretty correct. >> he was always kind of leaning over the president like, i am right here. printed. >> while he would say things like will not here into leaders or whatever countries, it would be right in two leaders of whatever country, and she always like don reagan for some reason. he double crossed us on the budget. i remember, i think i told you this before. she came up the next day was champagne, chocolates, all that stuff. >> what was your first impression of bill clinton in the white house? >> there are stories about you going down there. one of the stories is, what? about the government? >> yeah, first meeting. >> i would say, you didn't even have donuts in your place. donuts for the republicans. next meeting we had donuts. and every meeting after that. i thought he was a very charming guy. i helped him out on nafta, which i know would not like to look back on. anytime a tried to get something done, it didn't hap

i don't know why ronald reagan wanted to be chief of staff so badly. he was always kind of leaning over the president like i'm right here. two leaders of whatever countries and he's right in the middle. he double crossed us on the budget. i remember we came up the next day with champagne and chocolates and all this stuff -- >> what was your first impression of bill clinton in the white house because these stories about you going down there, and one of the stories is what? about doughnuts? >> yeah, first meeting i was like you don't even have doughnuts in this place. i thought he was a very charming guy. and i helped him out on nafta. a lot of our companies get out of this w.h.o. stuff and adverse bias rulings. anyway, and i remember talking to him about monica lewinsky. and i told him what i thought he should do to get a letter signed by 34 senators saying there's no way we're going to convict, to have it in your pocket. then i wrote the op-ed piece, which i think he would have accepted kind of i did something wrong and maybe a rebuke and that would ha

i think ronald reagan did in 1980. there are ways to drive cultural change that could be within politics, a lot of which outside of politics and i keep my mind totally open to see where i could have the most impact and hopefully have some fun personally along the way doing it. >> host: to see any leaders after moving in the right direction in your judgment? >> guest: not that immediately, to mind. i will be brutally honest with you. >> host: joe biden has explicitly endorse stakeholder capitalism. he called the idea that it was -- obviously he's very explicit and wants to envy opposite direction. >> guest: he's moving the opposite direction i'm advocating here. i still root for his success, when he took office he said he wanted it to unify the country. i took him at his word and i was rooting for them to succeed because that was something else probably what our country may need now more than anything else. i've been disappointed in that i'm not sure how committed he is or even ever was to that idea. for example, look a

i think ronald reagan did in 1980. there are ways to drive cultural change that could be within politics, a lot of which outside of politics and i keep my mind totally open to see where i could have the most impact and hopefully have some fun personally along the way doing it. >> host: to see any leaders after moving in the right direction in your judgment? >> guest: not that immediately, to mind. i will be brutally honest with you. >> host: joe biden has explicitly endorse stakeholder capitalism. he called the idea that it was -- obviously he's very explicit and wants to envy opposite direction. >> guest: he's moving the opposite direction i'm advocating here. i still root for his success, when he took office he said he wanted it to unify the country. i took him at his word and i was rooting for them to succeed because that was something else probably what our country may need now more than anything else. i've been disappointed in that i'm not sure how committed he is or even ever was to that idea. for example, look a

reagan, and another republican, and a conservative republican governor of california started the zev program, the zero emissions vehicle program which i have been intimately involved with auto manufacturers and also to a degree with other regulations with the heavy duty manufacturers. i have been in at funerals of constituents of mine who have died while working in these refineries. i don't know if you have been in any of those. five of them died. one of them died because the company, not yours, but somebody who's still -- a company that competes with you was appealing a citation from cal osha to replace walky talkies that cost less than a thousand dollars. michael landsman who was trying to use that to tell the folks back in the command unit that they should shut down the hydro cracker, they couldn't hear him in time because so he was eviscerated. that's a long way of saying i have a long history in this field. you provide value, but it's time to change. and we don't have time from an economic standpoint or an environmental standpoint to haggle over this, but we've got to remember h

the voting rights act was a gem of american legislation, as president ronald reagan said and as other presidents on both sides of the aisle have said. a key part of that provision was section 5, as you said. this was a pre clearance provision, which required specified states where there had been discriminatory practices that provisions for changes in patterns or practices of voting should be submitted to the department for pre clearance to determine whether they violated the act. there was another alternative, if state did not like the result from the justice department it could go to a court and get a resolution there. but the great idea of pre clearance was to allow advanced review for those things went into effect rather than require the justice department on a one by one basis after the fact. makes it extremely difficult to attack unlawful prescriptions on voting practice. >> thank you, assistant attorney general clark testified number two is no substitute for the important preemptive review provided by the process. the full impact of the supreme court's recent decision in bernvic

she sees -- she wants to see the ronald reagan type guy return and you know? ronald reagan didn't have the democrats so viciously attacking him. like donald trump did. the cameras came on him when he was fighting back from all that. did he handle it well all the time? no. he didn't. and he showed it and but we don't know -- you know? ronald reagan have that kind of attachment to think it's going to go back to that scenario, the way things were in 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983. it won't. it's just so naive. and the mitt romney guy. i mean, it's ridiculous. >> do you think political parties were any better back in that era in terms of their relationships with each other? what's your view? >> caller: well, i do, you know. you did see some, you know, a little more cooperation between the two but now -- and plus this -- the 24-hour news cycle all the time. they really don't want to get up there and make america work. they want to get a headline so their democrat donors can say wow, look what he did. boy, he really stuck to do him. i'm going to send some more money. i have