get any money, why don't we start with a san francisco ami and then make the san francisco neighborhood adjustments. it's beyond me to understand why it is that we're sticking with a jupbal ami in a program that requires, that doesn't have any federal money in it, that indeed is a new public policy that it has no public subsidy which has been elevated to a new master plan policy, i guess. then let's have the current of our neighborhood, let's do a city ami >> commissioners, you remember how an unadjusted ami gives us greater simplicity, it streamlines our process. if we have dueling ami programs, it slows down the process and it's more costly. there's nothing magical about an ami chart versus a hud unadjusted ami chart. what's the average people make? on the hut chart, the point is go to the data, look at what the incomes are in the neighborhood, look at what the market rate is in the neighborhood and pick the place. it's either could be to be fiflt percent and 45 percent, you don't need to have dualing charts. we can look at data on the market rate rents and pick an ami level according

francisco now i'll walk you through through the criteria that map is of dozens of districts in san francisco and that's all one and 50 thousand plus parcels the city so first, we limited over analyze to zones the planning department recollected by the former agency for the port are used a large development agreement last week that will be the order are roechdz their potential is largely considered by the program rather the planning lo alone it politiappl stati state law projects it is not as pdrs or p zones for example, are excluded this leave us with the zoning direc districts where residential is allowed from the gwen this program has excluded the many heaareas that were sdroend the last exactly like metabolarket octavia and t eastern neighborhoods that are created under the plans generally don't limit density by law area instead recollecting by height and bulk and minimum two bedrooms requirement we didn't say look at the ahbp the newer district the department is working closely with at city agencies to develop tools including possible the density bonuses to increase the affordable housin

residential in san francisco are about 230 or 40. if you are taking, aggregating lots of 250 or half the block you are creating substantially large buildings in areas where you might have a need of much, much finer grain and with additional heights on what is half a block i'm very concerned that those buildings could look overly monsterous relative to what we are trying to achieve. unless additional guidelines are developed which break down the appearance of the building into what is the typical lot width in san francisco we want to avoid in the rush for value capture we are forgetting architectural modulation and all these kinds of things for, by which i was wondering --. >> don't worry, i'm listening. >> not forgetting the essence of what san francisco architecture is all about. i'm sorry, the urban design plan itself, and that is 4c3, very strongly spoke against lot mergers. for those people who haven't been around i need to remind you because what urban design plan for the downtown district required was indeed to avoid having the

to help and benefit san francisco as a whole especially the fathers and mothers in san francisco thank you for your time >> thank you. next speaker, please good evening, commissioners i'm peter hartman a resident homeowner and also chair of the ocii transbay advisory committee as you've heard the citizens advisory committee approved the height increase in our january meeting the main reasons why we did see were first and foremost because of the increase in the number of housing units 73, 60 persons will be below-market-rate and felt this was extremely important given the current issues of the cost in our city we secondly, we found the effective shadows on rincon park and the other parks in the city to be amuse we found the higher building height is really very much in keeps very much with the surrounding character of the 74th annual memorial day neighborhood as development whethn we came up wh the original plan 13 or 14 years ago that was surface parking lots and at that time, three hundred foot building seemed very the idea of a three hundred foot building is bold now it is modest bec

did it and denver did and a san francisco, california do it, too i'll not let the diversifiesness of the efforts to rip away the proce progress we've a maid the schafrm withs those commissioners in the past year than >> good afternoon, commissioners i'm alison heath with a lifelong friend of jackson park she and i raised our families on potrero hill and other we were forced to struggle with the city over new criminality that was 20 some years ago then as now san francisco had the lowest percentage of children under 8 than any supply the country we understand the as commissioners you have zero control over the s f rp d and the budget but have the ability to shape policies through area plans and new you go guidelines to reverse the trends the showcase square castro hipotrer plans to achieve for fraamilies friendly place and others communities services zoning requirement were written to promoted a significant number of units with two or more bedrooms and design housing with private entrances open space inclusion of other spaces such the pedestrian family-friendly sidewalks and onsite in

level and only want to have more san francisco rents it is san francisco incomes excuse me. but you it is a feasibility study and so in my opinion users how steady am i is it better it is lower or covers for people or san francisco specific number better for forgot the administration in terms of the reach the effectiveness of the program which number it better. >> again, i think i know in our 100 percent affordable projects we've reached a huge range not huge range but the wide range from zero to 60 and so where we see on which unadjust chart is sort of immaterial to the fact we're able to serve low income people 92 percent of the housing we produce the non-restricted tax credit units again, i think that you can use this chart the question is 55 percent of e-mail or one and 40ers ami where we want to be or should those numbers be lower i think that it is really a question of faebeasibility anals in the market-rate development e development you have to pay tax credits sorry pay property taxes your basically covering the operating experience expenses so let's serve people at 5

francisco by supporting the services within the feigned we help san francisco remain unique and successful and rib rant where will you shop the shop and dine the 49 i'm e jonl i provide sweets square feet potpie and peach cobbler and i started my business this is my baby i started out of high home and he would back for friends and coworkers they'll tell you hoa you need to open up a shop at the time he move forward book to the bayview and i thinks the t line was up i need have a shop on third street i live in bayview and i wanted to have my shop here in bayview a quality dessert shot shop in my neighborhood in any business is different everybody is in small banishes there are homemade recess pesz and ingredients from scratch we shop local because we have someone that is here in your city or your neighborhood that is provide you with is service with quality ingredients and quality products and need to be know that person the person behind the products it is not like okay. whome to the regular meeting of the thursday, february 25, thursday, february 25, any kind. proceedings. and when speaki

good afternoon eric brooks san francisco green party argue our city clean power advocates and clean power choice first of all, i won't forget it on the last point raised it would be good hopefully in under the same mou so it didn't cost more money add in sonoma and better perspectives to dovetail we're not getting one prospective from the community choice if possible so the greater subject of community choice that is the first opportunity for the folks to thank lafco although the chair and the vice chair that both are continuing for under our watch getting this off the ground this program started and that can't be understated how the important it is how important lafco is over the years and plus in is just spectacular we got this off the ground and on marketing i've noticed noticed i personally starting getting e-mails if pg&e and informed sfpuc staff putting out a poll of goodnesss we're setting up businesses so say hey we'll help you through the energy efficient and things like that we should be aware aware that pg&e is getting the game and we need to counter that one thing will help th